journal article·2023-12-11Open access

Antifungal Activity of Nontoxic Nanocomposite Based on Silver and Reduced Graphene Oxide against Dermatophytes and Candida spp

Bianca Gottardo, Andreza R. M. Zoccal, Taiza Maschio-Lima, Thiago H. Lemes, Mario H. Paziani, Marcia R. Von Zeska Kress, Tarcísio M. Perfecto, Margarete T. G. Almeida, Diogo P. Volanti

Abstract

Dermatomycoses are typical hair, skin, or nail infections caused mainly by dermatophytes and nondermatophytes: Trichophyton, Microsporum, Epidermophyton, and Candida. In addition to the esthetical impact, pain, and nail deformity, these mycoses can be a source of severe disease. The high cost of treatment, toxicity, and the emergence of resistant infectious agents justifies research into new drugs. This work evaluates the fungicidal activity of nanocomposites (NCs) based on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) loaded with silver (Ag) nanoparticles (rGO/Ag) against clinical isolates of dermatophytes and Candida species. This is an unprecedented study in which, for the first time, hybrid nanocompounds based on Ag/rGO were tested against Epidermophytom, Microsporum, and Trichophyton species (dermatophytes agents). In this paper, we synthesize rGO using different concentrations of Ag by hydrolysis of metal salt AgNO 3 and follow the growth of nanocrystals on sheets of rGO provided by the NaBH 4 . The NCs were analyzed by X-ray diffraction analysis, and the NC morphology, silver distribution on the rGO surface, and crystalline information were investigated by transmission electron microscopy. Antifungal susceptibility assay was performed by the microdilution method based on modified Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocol. Time-kill kinetics was conducted to monitor the effect of the composite to inhibit fungal cells or promote structural changes, avoiding germination. The toxicological evaluation of the NCs was born in an in vivo model based on Galleria mellonella (G. mellonella) . Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the rGO/Ag NCs ranged from 1.9 to 125 μg/mL. The best inhibitory activity was obtained for rGO/Ag12%, mainly against Candida spp. and Epidermophyton floccosum . In the presence of sorbitol, MIC values of rGO/Ag NCs were higher (ranging from 15.6 to 250 μg/mL), indicating the action mechanism on the cell wall. Both yeast and dermatophytes clinical isolates were inhibited at a minimum of 6 and 24 h, respectively, but after 2 and 12 h, they had initial antifungal interference. All hybrid formulations of rGO/Ag NCs were not toxic for G. mellonella . This study provides insights into an alternative therapeutic strategy for controlling dermatomycoses.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Biosciences, Humanities, and Exact Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), R. Cristóvão Colombo 2265, São José do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo 15054-000, Brazil

Barão de Mauá University Center (BMUC), Rua. Ramos de Azevedo 423, Ribeirão Preto, Sao Paulo 14090-062, Brazil

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Av. do Café s/n, Ribeirão Preto, Sao Paulo 14040-903, Brazil

São José do Rio Preto Medical School (FAMERP), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima 5416, São José do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo 15090-000, Brazil

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico · Funda??o de Amparo ? Pesquisa do Estado de S?o Paulo · Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior

References (79)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/09546634.2021.194242110.1080/09546634.2021.1942421 ↗
2. 10.37134/jsml.vol8.1.2.202010.37134/jsml.vol8.1.2.2020 ↗
3. Ginter-hanselmayer G. · 201910.1007/978-3-319-92300-0_10 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11046-020-00509-x10.1007/s11046-020-00509-x ↗
5. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-101220-03430610.1146/annurev-immunol-101220-034306 ↗
6. 10.3390/jof401000910.3390/jof4010009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.fgb.2019.10325510.1016/j.fgb.2019.103255 ↗
8. 10.1111/jam.1461110.1111/jam.14611 ↗
9. 10.1186/2228-5326-2-3210.1186/2228-5326-2-32 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12010-022-04120-210.1007/s12010-022-04120-2 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12010-022-04199-710.1007/s12010-022-04199-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.10387410.1016/j.jddst.2022.103874 ↗
13. 10.1039/c3ra46835f10.1039/c3ra46835f ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.10.02310.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.10.023 ↗
15. 10.1021/am502291410.1021/am5022914 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41598-017-01669-510.1038/s41598-017-01669-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.08.00710.1016/j.tiv.2016.08.007 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.01.03810.1016/j.micpath.2018.01.038 ↗
19. 10.3390/polym1416335210.3390/polym14163352 ↗
20. 10.3390/jof806061210.3390/jof8060612 ↗
21. 10.3390/jof802012610.3390/jof8020126 ↗
22. 10.1039/D1RA04542C10.1039/D1RA04542C ↗
23. 10.1002/slct.20160078310.1002/slct.201600783 ↗
24. 10.1080/10715762.2021.191433510.1080/10715762.2021.1914335 ↗
25. 10.3390/nano1107178410.3390/nano11071784 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12923510.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129235 ↗
27. 10.1039/C6RA16892B10.1039/C6RA16892B ↗
28. 10.1007/s10854-020-03747-310.1007/s10854-020-03747-3 ↗
29. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
30. 10.1063/5.004900810.1063/5.0049008 ↗
31. CLSI · Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Método de Referência Para Testes de Diluição Em Caldo Para a Determinação Da Sensibilidade a Terapia Antifúngica Das Leveduras · 2002 · 22
32. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference Method for Broth Dilution. Ref. method broth dilution Antifung. susceptibility Test. yeasts. Approv. Stand, 3rd edition; 2008; vol 28, p 13.
33. 10.1590/S1516-8913201300050000510.1590/S1516-89132013000500005 ↗
34. 10.1093/jac/41.3.39710.1093/jac/41.3.397 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.05610.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.056 ↗
36. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02079.x10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02079.x ↗
37. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.12.01010.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.12.010 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0009110.1021/acsanm.9b00091 ↗
39. 10.3390/jof708062910.3390/jof7080629 ↗
40. 10.1007/s12281-019-0334-410.1007/s12281-019-0334-4 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.02310.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.023 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apt.2017.09.03210.1016/j.apt.2017.09.032 ↗
43. 10.1039/C7RA07706H10.1039/C7RA07706H ↗
44. 10.1039/C6RA28311J10.1039/C6RA28311J ↗
45. 10.1039/B917103G10.1039/B917103G ↗
46. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.08.01310.1016/j.carbon.2008.08.013 ↗
47. 10.1166/jnn.2016.1132710.1166/jnn.2016.11327 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.surfin.2018.08.00410.1016/j.surfin.2018.08.004 ↗
49. Moulder J. F. · 1992
50. 10.1039/C6RA00857G10.1039/C6RA00857G ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.16510.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.165 ↗
52. Thermo Scientific XPS Simplified.
53. 10.1002/adfm.20090016610.1002/adfm.200900166 ↗
54. 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00120-310.1016/0008-6223(95)00120-3 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.10316010.1016/j.jece.2019.103160 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14465510.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144655 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.05.00510.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.05.005 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.nanoso.2018.05.00210.1016/j.nanoso.2018.05.002 ↗
59. 10.1021/acsabm.1c0050810.1021/acsabm.1c00508 ↗
60. 10.1021/nn101390x10.1021/nn101390x ↗
61. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0206710.1021/acsnano.5b02067 ↗
62. 10.1007/s10534-008-9159-210.1007/s10534-008-9159-2 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.00610.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.006 ↗
64. 10.1111/1346-8138.1561810.1111/1346-8138.15618 ↗
65. Silva G. De. S. · 2016
66. 10.1590/S0365-0596201000050000910.1590/S0365-05962010000500009 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.10357710.1016/j.jece.2019.103577 ↗
68. 10.1039/C5RA04508H10.1039/C5RA04508H ↗
69. 10.1021/es902240k10.1021/es902240k ↗
70. 10.1021/jp807989b10.1021/jp807989b ↗
71. 10.7241/ourd.20221.710.7241/ourd.20221.7 ↗
72. 10.1039/C4RA13117G10.1039/C4RA13117G ↗
73. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.06910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.069 ↗
74. 10.1039/C3NR04941H10.1039/C3NR04941H ↗
75. 10.7546/CRABS.2021.02.0410.7546/CRABS.2021.02.04 ↗
76. 10.1097/FTD.000000000000095210.1097/FTD.0000000000000952 ↗
77. 10.3390/jof404012810.3390/jof4040128 ↗
78. 10.1186/s13104-017-2757-810.1186/s13104-017-2757-8 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.11.00610.1016/j.addr.2007.11.006 ↗