Osseointegration of 3D-Printable Polyetheretherketone–Magnesium Phosphate Bioactive Composites for Craniofacial and Orthopedic Implants
Source abstract
Abstract
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a high-performance polymer material for developing varying orthopedic, spine, cranial, maxillofacial, and dental implants. Despite their commendable mechanical properties and biocompatibility, the major limitation of PEEK implants is their low affinity to osseointegrate with the neighboring bone. Over the last two decades, several efforts have been made to incorporate bioactive components such as bioceramic particles in PEEK to enhance its osseointegration capacity. However, one major limitation is that the bioceramic particles embedded in the PEEK matrix can degrade over time, compromising the implant’s long-term bioactivity and mechanical properties. To address this limitation, in this study, we utilized a unique bioceramic known as amorphous magnesium phosphate (AMP). AMP is a metastable phase of magnesium phosphate that nanocrystallizes in a physiological medium to stable bioactive phases exhibiting low degradation kinetics and high bioactivity. Thus, based on this property of AMP, we hypothesize that AMP-PEEK composites will exhibit sustained biodegradation kinetics, help maintain long-term osseointegration, and inhibit mechanical property degradation. Herein, we reported on a detailed in vitro degradation analysis of the developed AMP-PEEK composite 3D-printable filaments and the osseointegration capacity when implanted in a rat femoral model. The AMP-PEEK composite demonstrates controlled degradation kinetics, with tensile strength progressively decreasing from 120 to 70 MPa over a 28-day period due to hydrolytic degradation, which aligns with its role as a bioresorbable material. Notably, our findings confirm that AMP-PEEK composite osseointegration is on par with clinical gold-standard titanium implants. Thus, this study establishes a unique magnesium phosphate and PEEK-based bioactive composite material with promising potential for developing standalone dental and craniofacial implants.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Cleveland State University
Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics
School of Dentistry, University of Michigan
Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering
University of Michigan
Funding
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services · National Institute of Health/ National Institue of Dental and Craniofacial Research
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mtla.2022.10142710.1016/j.mtla.2022.101427 ↗
2. Skirbutis G. · Stomatologija · 2018 · 20 · 54
3. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.10487810.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.104878 ↗
4. Kurtz, S. M.An overview of PEEK biomaterials PEEK Biomaterials Handbook 2012, pp 1–7 10.1016/B978-1-4377-4463-7.10001-6.10.1016/B978-1-4377-4463-7.10001-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10551010.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105510 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.13320610.1016/j.matlet.2022.133206 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11837-022-05361-610.1007/s11837-022-05361-6 ↗
8. 10.1002/jbm.b.3266910.1002/jbm.b.32669 ↗
9. 10.4137/CMAMD.S2035410.4137/CMAMD.S20354 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00586-020-06642-x10.1007/s00586-020-06642-x ↗
11. 10.3390/ijms1504542610.3390/ijms15045426 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.03310.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.033 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.12.02510.1016/j.msec.2017.12.025 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0059410.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00594 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dental.2020.04.00810.1016/j.dental.2020.04.008 ↗
16. 10.1088/1748-6041/11/5/05501010.1088/1748-6041/11/5/055010 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.0c0531110.1021/acsami.0c05311 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10856-012-4743-y10.1007/s10856-012-4743-y ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.03210.1016/j.msec.2015.03.032 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0162010.1021/acsabm.0c01620 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.06.00710.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.06.007 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.01810.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.018 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10856-012-4743-y10.1007/s10856-012-4743-y ↗
24. 10.1039/D3MA00172E10.1039/D3MA00172E ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.12110.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.121 ↗
26. Naganaboyina, H. P.; Nagaraju, P.; Sonaye, S. Y.; Bokam, V. K.; Sikder, P. In-house processing of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) 3D printable filaments and fused filament fabrication-3d printing of CFR-PEEK parts, 2023.10.21203/rs.3.rs-2725585/v1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.02310.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.023 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10714910.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107149 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10460110.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104601 ↗
30. 10.1557/jmr.2016.8410.1557/jmr.2016.84 ↗
31. Vallet-Regí M. · 2008
32. 10.1186/s40824-018-0149-310.1186/s40824-018-0149-3 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.01810.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.018 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.11.03310.1016/j.actbio.2024.11.033 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10385010.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103850 ↗
36. 10.2147/IJN.S7555710.2147/IJN.S75557 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.surfin.2024.10476110.1016/j.surfin.2024.104761 ↗