journal article·2023-01-09

Computational Design of Antimicrobial Active Surfaces via Automated Bayesian Optimization

Hanfeng Zhai, Jingjie Yeo

Publisher page

Abstract

Biofilms pose significant problems for engineers in diverse fields, such as marine science, bioenergy, and biomedicine, where effective biofilm control is a long-term goal. The adhesion and surface mechanics of biofilms play crucial roles in generating and removing biofilm. Designing customized nanosurfaces with different surface topologies can alter the adhesive properties to remove biofilms more easily and greatly improve long-term biofilm control. To rapidly design such topologies, we employ individual-based modeling and Bayesian optimization to automate the design process and generate different active surfaces for effective biofilm removal. Our framework successfully generated optimized functional nanosurfaces for improved biofilm removal through applied shear and vibration. Densely distributed short pillar topography is the optimal geometry to prevent biofilm formation. Under fluidic shearing, the optimal topography is to sparsely distribute tall, slim, pillar-like structures. When subjected to either vertical or lateral vibrations, thick trapezoidal cones are found to be optimal. Optimizing the vibrational loading indicates a small vibration magnitude with relatively low frequencies is more efficient in removing biofilm. Our results provide insights into various engineering fields that require surface-mediated biofilm control. Our framework can also be applied to more general materials design and optimization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York14850, United States

Funding

Cornell University · Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation · National Science Foundation

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. US EPA. Health Risks from Microbial Growth and Biofilms in Drinking Water Distribution Systems, 2002. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/2007_05_18_disinfection_tcr_whitepaper_tcr_biofilms.pdf (accessed Sep. 12th, 2022).
2. BEAMIT Group. Leading Additive Manufacturing services hub and One-Stop Shop. https://www.beam-it.eu/ accessed Sep. 12th, 2022).
3. 10.1111/1462-2920.1218610.1111/1462-2920.12186 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e0106710.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01067 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00665.x10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00665.x ↗
6. Chan J. · 2010
7. 10.1098/rsta.2011.050210.1098/rsta.2011.0502 ↗
8. WHO. New report calls for urgent action to avert antimicrobial resistance crisis. https://www.who.int/news/item/29-04-2019-new-report-calls-for-urgent-action-to-avert-antimicrobial-resistance-crisis accessed Sep. 12th, 2022).
9. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.04.00110.1016/j.pnsc.2008.04.001 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41522-018-0062-510.1038/s41522-018-0062-5 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.12059510.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120595 ↗
12. 10.1038/npjbiofilms.2015.2210.1038/npjbiofilms.2015.22 ↗
13. Marine fouling and its prevention, prepared for Bureau of Ships, Navy Dept. Naval Institute Press: Annapolis, MD, 1952.
14. 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060718-03040110.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060718-030401 ↗
15. 10.1002/admi.20220043010.1002/admi.202200430 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0119310.1021/acs.biomac.0c01193 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.121966211010.1073/pnas.1219662110 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.7b0132210.1021/acsami.7b01322 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.7b0422310.1021/acsami.7b04223 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsabm.1c0131810.1021/acsabm.1c01318 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0472610.1021/acsnano.8b04726 ↗
22. 10.2514/1.C03243910.2514/1.C032439 ↗
23. Frazier, P. I.; Wang, J. Information Science for Materials Discovery and Design; Springer International Publishing: New York, 2015; pp 45–75.10.1007/978-3-319-23871-5_3 ↗
24. 10.1002/9780471729259.mc01b01s0010.1002/9780471729259.mc01b01s00 ↗
25. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.6210.1038/nrmicro.2016.62 ↗
26. 10.1099/00221287-147-11-289710.1099/00221287-147-11-2897 ↗
27. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100712510.1371/journal.pcbi.1007125 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
29. 10.1186/s13068-017-0798-910.1186/s13068-017-0798-9 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41467-020-16055-510.1038/s41467-020-16055-5 ↗
31. 10.1146/annurev.mi.03.100149.00210310.1146/annurev.mi.03.100149.002103 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.11.05010.1016/j.powtec.2015.11.050 ↗
33. 10.1021/i160024a00710.1021/i160024a007 ↗
34. Snoek, J.; Larochelle, H.; Adams, R. P.Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms. arXiv (Machine Learning), August, 2012, 1206.2944, ver. 2. https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2944 (accessed Sep. 12th, 2022).
35. Frazier, P. I.A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization. arXiv (Machine Learning), July, 2018, 1807.02811, ver. 1. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.02811 (accessed Sep. 12th, 2022).
36. 10.1063/5.006890310.1063/5.0068903 ↗
37. 10.1039/D1ME00093D10.1039/D1ME00093D ↗
38. 10.1109/TIT.2011.218203310.1109/TIT.2011.2182033 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.55558110.1063/1.555581 ↗
40. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.0187110.3389/fmicb.2019.01871 ↗
41. 10.1007/BF0025281410.1007/BF00252814 ↗