Fabrication and Properties of Biodegradable Akermanite-Reinforced Fe35Mn Alloys for Temporary Orthopedic Implant Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
As a representative of the biodegradable iron (Fe)–manganese (Mn) alloys, Fe35Mn has been investigated as a promising biodegradable metal biomaterial for orthopedic applications. However, its slow degradation rate, though better than pure Fe, and poor bioactivity are concerns that retard its clinical applications. Akermanite (Ca 2 MgSi 2 O 7, Ake) is a silicate-based bioceramic, showing desirable degradability and bioactivity for bone repair. In the present work, Fe35Mn/Ake composites were prepared via a powder metallurgy route. The effect of different contents of Ake (0, 10, 30, 50 vol %) on the microstructure, mechanical properties, degradation, and biocompatibility of the composites was investigated. The ceramic phases were found to be evenly distributed in the metal matrix. The Ake reacted with Fe35Mn and generated CaFeSiO 4 during sintering. The addition of Ake increased the relative density of pure Fe35Mn from ∼90 to ∼94–97%. The compressive yield strength (CYS) and elastic modulus ( E c ) increased with increasing Ake, with Fe35Mn/50Ake exhibiting the highest CYS of ∼403 MPa and E c of ∼18 GPa. However, the ductility decreased at higher Ake concentrations (30 and 50%). Microhardness also showed an increasing trend with the addition of Ake. Electrochemical measurements indicated that higher concentrations of Ake (30 and 50%) could potentially increase the corrosion rate of Fe35Mn from ∼0.25 to ∼0.39 mm/year. However, all of the compositions tested did not show measurable weight loss after immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF) for 4 weeks, attributed to the use of prealloyed raw material, high sintered density of the fabricated composites, and the formation of a dense Ca-, P-, and O-rich layer on the surface. Human osteoblasts on Fe35Mn/Ake composites showed increasing viability with increasing Ake content, indicating improved in vitro biocompatibility. These preliminary results suggest that Fe35Mn/Ake can be a potential material for biodegradable bone implant applications, particularly Fe35Mn/30Ake, if the slow corrosion of the composite can be addressed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
Funding
Australian Research Council
References (89)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001 ↗
2. 10.1007/s40204-018-0091-410.1007/s40204-018-0091-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.02.00310.1016/j.bbe.2020.02.003 ↗
4. 10.3390/ma1412338110.3390/ma14123381 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-018-3011-z10.1007/s10853-018-3011-z ↗
6. 10.1039/C6RA20594A10.1039/C6RA20594A ↗
7. 10.1002/mco2.5910.1002/mco2.59 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1412338110.3390/ma14123381 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.b.3489310.1002/jbm.b.34893 ↗
10. 10.1179/174329008X28486810.1179/174329008X284868 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.10010.1016/j.msec.2017.05.100 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.10.02310.1016/j.msec.2013.10.023 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.b.3338910.1002/jbm.b.33389 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.06510.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.065 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.7b1520610.1021/acsami.7b15206 ↗
16. Hermawan H. · 2007 · 113
17. 10.1002/jbm.a.3222410.1002/jbm.a.32224 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.02510.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.025 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.02710.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.027 ↗
20. 10.1002/jbm.b.3324210.1002/jbm.b.33242 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0149710.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01497 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.01810.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.018 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.00710.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.007 ↗
24. 10.3415/vcot-17-06-008010.3415/vcot-17-06-0080 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cossms.2020.10082210.1016/j.cossms.2020.100822 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.05510.1016/j.msec.2019.02.055 ↗
27. 10.1002/adhm.20200066710.1002/adhm.202000667 ↗
28. 10.1007/s42242-020-00087-310.1007/s42242-020-00087-3 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.00410.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.004 ↗
30. 10.1088/1748-6041/8/3/03200110.1088/1748-6041/8/3/032001 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.00210.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.002 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10853-014-8532-510.1007/s10853-014-8532-5 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.12.02210.1016/j.msec.2013.12.022 ↗
34. 10.1002/jbm.b.3331510.1002/jbm.b.33315 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.09210.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.092 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.12.00110.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.12.001 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41427-018-0015-810.1038/s41427-018-0015-8 ↗
38. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab45b910.1088/2053-1591/ab45b9 ↗
39. 10.1002/adhm.20170012010.1002/adhm.201700120 ↗
40. 10.1111/ijac.1381410.1111/ijac.13814 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.02.03910.1016/j.matlet.2004.02.039 ↗
42. 10.1002/jbm.a.3049610.1002/jbm.a.30496 ↗
43. 10.1177/088532820605795310.1177/0885328206057953 ↗
44. 10.1002/jbm.b.3077910.1002/jbm.b.30779 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.02710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.027 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.03910.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.039 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.07710.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.077 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.06.00910.1016/j.actbio.2022.06.009 ↗
49. ASTM International · 2009
50. ASTM International · 2004
51. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
52. ASTM International · 2018
53. 10.1007/BF0054444810.1007/BF00544448 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.00210.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.002 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.07.01410.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.07.014 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.13210.1016/j.msec.2016.12.132 ↗
57. 10.1007/BF0264732910.1007/BF02647329 ↗
58. Bai, Y.; Wagner, G.; Williams, C. B. In Effect of Bimodal Powder Mixture on Powder Packing Density and Sintered Density in Binder Jetting of Metals, 2015 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium; University of Texas at Austin, 2015.
59. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003 ↗
60. 10.1177/088532821665727110.1177/0885328216657271 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.02110.1016/j.msec.2017.05.021 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.10.01010.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.10.010 ↗
63. 10.1007/s11661-017-4028-710.1007/s11661-017-4028-7 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.03.04810.1016/j.matchar.2019.03.048 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.05410.1016/j.msea.2017.07.054 ↗
66. 10.1002/jbm.a.3515510.1002/jbm.a.35155 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.07.05610.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.07.056 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.10.06810.1016/j.matlet.2010.10.068 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.01510.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.015 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11016010.1016/j.corsci.2022.110160 ↗
71. 10.1007/s11837-019-03357-310.1007/s11837-019-03357-3 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.04910.1016/j.msec.2015.09.049 ↗
73. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab62f510.1088/2053-1591/ab62f5 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.00110.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.001 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.04810.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.048 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.26110.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.261 ↗
77. 10.1002/jbm.b.3045610.1002/jbm.b.30456 ↗
78. 10.22203/eCM.v022a0610.22203/eCM.v022a06 ↗
79. 10.1038/srep2200510.1038/srep22005 ↗
80. Jugdaohsingh R. · J. Nutr., Health Aging · 2007 · 11 · 99
81. 10.1016/j.jajs.2017.10.00310.1016/j.jajs.2017.10.003 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.02310.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.023 ↗
83. 10.1039/C2BM00108J10.1039/C2BM00108J ↗
84. 10.1079/PNS200330110.1079/PNS2003301 ↗
85. 10.1007/s00223-001-1091-110.1007/s00223-001-1091-1 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.ceca.2003.10.01410.1016/j.ceca.2003.10.014 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.04910.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.049 ↗
88. 10.1002/jbm.1027010.1002/jbm.10270 ↗
89. 10.1002/jbm.1022010.1002/jbm.10220 ↗