journal article·2024-01-08

Biomimetic Injectable Hydrogel Based on Methacrylate-Modified Silk Fibroin Embedded with Kartogenin for Superficial Cartilage Regeneration

Huimin Li, Zhicheng Tong, Yifei Fang, Fengling Liu, Feng He, Chong Teng

Publisher page

Abstract

The weak regeneration ability of chondrocytes is one of the main reasons that limit the therapeutic effect of clinical cartilage injury. Injectable hydrogels are potential scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering with advantages such as minimally invasive surgery, porous structure, and drug sustained-release ability. At present, many biomaterials have been developed for the repair of deep cartilage defects. However, cartilage injury often begins on the surface, which requires us to propose a treatment strategy suitable for superficial cartilage injury repair. In this study, we fabricated a biomimetic injectable hydrogel based on methacrylate-modified silk fibroin (SilMA) embedded with kartogenin (KGN). The SilMA/KGN hydrogels have good biohistocompatibility and the ability to promote cartilage differentiation. In addition, SEM results show that it has a porous structure conducive to cell adhesion and proliferation. Most importantly, it has demonstrated remarkable superficial cartilage repair ability in vivo, showing potential in cartilage tissue engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, 32200, China

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China

Funding

Department of Health of Zhejiang Province

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.9510.1038/nrrheum.2015.95 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.05.00510.1016/j.matbio.2018.05.005 ↗
3. 10.5435/JAAOS-21-05-30310.5435/JAAOS-21-05-303 ↗
4. 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.15710.1038/nrrheum.2014.157 ↗
5. 10.22203/eCM.v033a0510.22203/eCM.v033a05 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41584-019-0255-110.1038/s41584-019-0255-1 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jot.2019.09.00810.1016/j.jot.2019.09.008 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41591-020-1013-210.1038/s41591-020-1013-2 ↗
9. 10.1002/term.327310.1002/term.3273 ↗
10. 10.1111/jmi.1282410.1111/jmi.12824 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.08.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2020.08.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.00210.1016/j.addr.2018.06.002 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.121515710.1126/science.1215157 ↗
14. 10.1002/advs.20210557110.1002/advs.202105571 ↗
15. 10.7150/thno.3818210.7150/thno.38182 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.042 ↗
17. 10.3390/ijms2203149910.3390/ijms22031499 ↗
18. 10.3390/molecules2613388710.3390/molecules26133887 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.04410.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.019 ↗
21. 10.1002/jbm.b.3176510.1002/jbm.b.31765 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.00610.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.01110.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.011 ↗
24. 10.1089/ten.tea.2021.022610.1089/ten.tea.2021.0226 ↗
25. 10.1039/b713009k10.1039/b713009k ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20090417910.1002/adma.200904179 ↗
27. 10.3390/ijms1711195710.3390/ijms17111957 ↗
28. 10.1155/2016/187983710.1155/2016/1879837 ↗
29. 10.1002/term.184610.1002/term.1846 ↗
30. 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.027710.1089/ten.tea.2014.0277 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cis.2019.03.00210.1016/j.cis.2019.03.002 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11029110.1016/j.msec.2019.110291 ↗
33. 10.1038/boneres.2014.810.1038/boneres.2014.8 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20150533610.1002/adma.201505336 ↗
35. 10.1038/ncomms509510.1038/ncomms5095 ↗
36. 10.1038/nmat189010.1038/nmat1890 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41598-017-02497-310.1038/s41598-017-02497-3 ↗