Plasma surface treatment of bacterial cellulose to increase hydrophobicity

1. Aditya T, Allain JP, Jaramillo C, Restrepo AM (2022) Surface Modification of Bacterial Cellulose for Biomedical Applications. Int J Mol Sci 23(2):610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2302061010.3390/ijms23020610 ↗

2. Akbari R, Antonini C (2021) Contact angle measurements: From existing methods to an open-source tool. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 294:102470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.10247010.1016/j.cis.2021.102470 ↗

3. Alvarez B, Sarmiento-Santos A, Vera-López E (2019) Acetylene polymerization in plasma of direct current. J Phys Conf Ser 1386:012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1386/1/01204410.1088/1742-6596/1386/1/012044 ↗

4. Amarasekara AS, Wang D, Grady TL (2020) A comparison of kombucha SCOBY bacterial cellulose purification methods. SN Appl Sci 2:240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-1982-210.1007/s42452-020-1982-2 ↗

5. Benedikt J (2010) Plasma-chemical reactions: low pressure acetylene plasmas. J Phys D: Appl Phys 43:043001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/43/4/04300110.1088/0022-3727/43/4/043001 ↗

6. Betlej I, Salerno-Kochan R, Jankowska A, Krajewski K, Wilkowski J, Rybak K, Nowacka M, Boruszewski P (2021) The Impact of the Mechanical Modification of Bacterial Cellulose Films on Selected Quality Parameters. Coatings 11(11):1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1111127510.3390/coatings11111275 ↗

7. Briggs D, Beamson G (1992) High resolution XPS of Organic Polymers. The Scienta ESCA300 Database. Wiley, Chichester

8. Burhenne L, Messmer J, Aicher T, Laborie MP (2013) The effect of the biomass components lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose on TGA and fixed bed pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 101:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.01.01210.1016/j.jaap.2013.01.012 ↗

9. Chacko SM, Thambi PT, Kuttan R, Nishigaki I (2010) Beneficial effects of green tea: A literature review. Chin Med 5:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8546-5-1310.1186/1749-8546-5-13 ↗

10. Correa F, Becker D, Fontana LC (2018) Electron confinement in active screen plasma system and extreme floating potential into the cage. Rev Bras Apl Vac 37:59–64. https://doi.org/10.17563/rbav.v37i2.109810.17563/rbav.v37i2.1098 ↗

11. Costa AFS, Rocha MAV, Sarubbo LA (2017) Review - Bacterial Cellulose: An Ecofriendly Biotextile. Int J Text Fash Technol 7:11–2610.24247/ijtftaug20172 ↗

12. da Silva CJG, de Medeiros ADM, de Amorim JDP, do Nascimento HA, Converti A, Costa AFS, Sarubbo LA (2021) Bacterial cellulose biotextiles for the future of sustainable fashion: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:2967–2980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01214-x10.1007/s10311-021-01214-x ↗

13. Denysenko IB, Xu S, Long JD, Rutkevych PP, Azarenkov NA, Ostrikov K (2004) Inductively coupled Ar/CH4/H2 plasmas for low-temperature deposition of ordered carbon nanostructures. J Appl Phys 95:2713–2724. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.164276210.1063/1.1642762 ↗

14. Dima SO, Panaitescu DM, Orban C, Ghiurea M, Doncea SM, Fierascu RC, Nistor CL, Alexandrescu E, Nicolae CA, Trică B, Moraru A, Oancea F (2017) Bacterial Nanocellulose from Side-Streams of Kombucha Beverages Production: Preparation and Physical-Chemical Properties. Polymers 9(8):374. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym908037410.3390/polym9080374 ↗

15. Fernandes M, Gama M, Dourado F, Souto AP (2019) Development of novel bacterial cellulose composites for the textile and shoe industry. Microb Biotechnol 12(4):650–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.1338710.1111/1751-7915.13387 ↗

16. Fernandes M, Souto AP, Gama M, Dourado F (2019) Bacterial Cellulose and Emulsified AESO Biocomposites as an Ecological Alternative to Leather. Nanomaterials 9(12):1710. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano912171010.3390/nano9121710 ↗

17. Flynn CN, Byrne CP, Meenan BJ (2013) Surface modification of cellulose via atmospheric pressure plasma processing in air and ammonia–nitrogen gas. Surf Coat Technol 233:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.04.00710.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.04.007 ↗

18. Friedrich J (2011) Mechanisms of Plasma Polymerization – Reviewed from a Chemical Point of View. Plasma Process Polym 8:783–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.20110003810.1002/ppap.201100038 ↗

19. Gallo SC, Charitidis C, Dong H (2017) Surface functionalization of carbon fibers with active screen plasma. J Vac Sci Technol 35(2):021404. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.497491310.1116/1.4974913 ↗

20. Gea S, Reynolds CT, Roohpour N, Wirjosentono B, Soykeabkaew N, Bilotti E, Peijs T (2011) Investigation into the structural, morphological, mechanical and thermal behaviour of bacterial cellulose after a two-step purification process. Bioresour Technol 102(19):9105–9110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.07710.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.077 ↗

21. Gregory DA, Tripathi L, Fricker ATR, Asare E, Orlando I, Raghavendran V, Roy I (2021) Bacterial cellulose: A smart biomaterial with diverse applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 145:100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2021.10062310.1016/j.mser.2021.100623 ↗

22. Guinter E, Fontana LC, Becker D (2019) Maleic anhydride film deposition through an active screen plasma system. Bull Mater Sci 42:23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-018-1706-z10.1007/s12034-018-1706-z ↗

23. He W, Zhang Z, Zheng Y, Qiao S, Xie Y, Sun Y, Qiao K, Feng Z, Wang X, Wang J (2020) Preparation of aminoalkyl-grafted bacterial cellulose membranes with improved antimicrobial properties for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res 108:1086–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3688410.1002/jbm.a.36884 ↗

24. Hettegger H, Sumerskii I, Sortino A, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2015) Silane Meets Click Chemistry: Towards the Functionalization of Wet Bacterial Cellulose Sheets. Chemsuschem 8:680–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20140299110.1002/cssc.201402991 ↗

25. Jayabalan R, Malbaša RV, Lončar ES, Vitas JS, Sathishkumar M (2014) A Review on Kombucha Tea-Microbiology, Composition, Fermentation, Beneficial Effects, Toxicity, and Tea Fungus. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 3(4):538–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.1207310.1111/1541-4337.12073 ↗

26. Kamiński K, Jarosz M, Grudzień J, Pawlik J, Zastawnik F, Pandyra P, Kołodziejczyk AM (2020) Hydrogel bacterial cellulose: a path to improved materials for new eco-friendly textiles. Cellulose 27:5353–5365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03128-310.1007/s10570-020-03128-3 ↗

27. Kluz MI, Pietrzyk K, Pastuszczak M, Kacaniova M, Kita A, Kapusta I, Zaguła G, Zagrobelna E, Struś K, Marciniak-Lukasiak K, Stanek-Tarkowska J, Timar AV, Puchalski C (2022) Microbiological and Physicochemical Composition of Various Types of Homemade Kombucha Beverages Using Alternative Kinds of Sugars. Foods 11:1523. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods1110152310.3390/foods11101523 ↗

28. Krishnamurthy M, Lobo NP, Samanta D (2020) Improved Hydrophobicity of a Bacterial Cellulose Surface: Click Chemistry in Action. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 6(2):879–888. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0157110.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01571 ↗

29. Kurniawan H, Lai JT, Wang MJ (2012) Biofunctionalized bacterial cellulose membranes by cold plasmas. Cellulose 19:1975–1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9785-210.1007/s10570-012-9785-2 ↗

30. Kutner MH (2004) Applied Linear Statistical Models. McGraw-Hill, New York

31. Laavanya D, Shirkole S, Balasubramanian P (2021) Current challenges, applications and future perspectives of SCOBY cellulose of Kombucha fermentation. J Cleaner Prod 295:126454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12645410.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126454 ↗

32. Latthe SS, Terashima C, Nakata K, Fujishima A (2014) Superhydrophobic Surfaces Developed by Mimicking Hierarchical Surface Morphology of Lotus Leaf. Molecules 19(4):4256–4283. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules1904425610.3390/molecules19044256 ↗

33. Leal S, Cristelo C, Silvestre S, Fortunato E, Sousa A, Alves A, Correia DM, Lanceros-Mendez S, Gama M (2020) Hydrophobic modification of bacterial cellulose using oxygen plasma treatment and chemical vapor deposition. Cellulose 27:10733–10746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03005-z10.1007/s10570-020-03005-z ↗

34. Lee KY, Quero F, Blaker JJ, Hill CAS, Eichhorn SJ, Bismarck A (2011) Surface only modification of bacterial cellulose nanofibres with organic acids. Cellulose 18:595–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9525-z10.1007/s10570-011-9525-z ↗

35. Lee KY, Buldum G, Mantalaris A, Bismarck A (2014) More Than Meets the Eye in Bacterial Cellulose: Biosynthesis, Bioprocessing, and Applications in Advanced Fiber Composites. Macromol Biosci 14:10–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20130029810.1002/mabi.201300298 ↗

36. Lima BL, Alves AS, Ferreira Martins GC (2021) Biofabricaçâo: Cultivo de Celulose Bacteriana para a Área de Moda. MIX Sustentável 7(3):153–164. https://doi.org/10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2021.v7.n3.153-16410.29183/2447-3073.MIX2021.v7.n3.153-164 ↗

37. Lv P, Xu W, Li D, Feng Q, Yao Y, Pang Z, Lucia LA, Wei Q (2016) Metal-based bacterial cellulose of sandwich nanomaterials for anti-oxidation electromagnetic interference shielding. Mater Des 112:374–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.10010.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.100 ↗

38. Macedo MOC, Macedo HRA, Santos ZM, Pereira MR, Alves Junior C (2010) Avaliação da Modificação de Membranas de Quitosana Tratadas por Plasma de Hidrogênio para Aplicações Biomédicas. Rev Bras Apl Vacuo 29:31–36

39. Mazotto AM, Silva JR, Brito LAA, Rocha NU, Soares AS (2021) How can microbiology help to improve sustainability in the fashion industry? Environ Technol Innov 23:101760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.10176010.1016/j.eti.2021.101760 ↗

40. Mehrotra R, Sharma S, Shree N, Kaur K (2023) Bacterial Cellulose: An Ecological Alternative as a Biotextile. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 20(2):449–463. https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/310110.13005/bbra/3101 ↗

41. Mondal S, Pal S, Bal R, Maity J (2018) Fabrication of two sites hydrophobicity on cotton surface – a fluoropolymerization approach. J Adhes Sci Technol 32(18):1965–1974. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.145840710.1080/01694243.2018.1458407 ↗

42. Montgomery D (2013) Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley, New York

43. Morrow R, Ribul M, Eastmond H, Lanot A, Baurley S (2023) Bio-producing bacterial cellulose filaments through co-designing with biological characteristics. Materials 16(14):4893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1614489310.3390/ma16144893 ↗

44. Mourgues A, Sanchez J, Roualdès S, Durand J (2005) Modelling of gas permeability for membranes prepared by PECVD. J Membr Sci 262(1–2):42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.03.04510.1016/j.memsci.2005.03.045 ↗

45. Movasaghi Z, Rehman S, Rehman I (2008) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of biological tissues. Appl Spectrosc Rev 43:134–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/0570492070182904310.1080/05704920701829043 ↗

46. Ng MCF, Wang W (2015) A study of the receptivity to bacterial cellulosic pellicle for fashion. RJTA 19(4):65–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-19-04-2015-B00710.1108/RJTA-19-04-2015-B007 ↗

47. Pascu M, Vasile C, Gheorghiu M (2003) Modification of polymer blend properties by argon plasma/electron beam treatment: surface properties. Mater Chem Phys 80(2):548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(03)00092-010.1016/S0254-0584(03)00092-0 ↗

48. Pertile RAN, Andrade FK, Alves C, Gama M (2010) Surface modification of bacterial cellulose by nitrogen-containing plasma for improved interaction with cells. Carbohydr Polym 82(3):692–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.03710.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.037 ↗

49. Provin AP, dos Reis VO, Hilesheim SE, Bianchet RT, Dutra ARA, Cubas ALV (2021) Use of bacterial cellulose in the textile industry and the wettability challenge—a review. Cellulose 28:8255–8274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04059-310.1007/s10570-021-04059-3 ↗

50. Rajwade JM, Paknikar KM, Kumbhar JV (2015) Applications of bacterial cellulose and its composites in biomedicine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(6):2491–2511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6426-310.1007/s00253-015-6426-3 ↗

51. Rathinamoorthy R, Kiruba T (2022) Bacterial cellulose-A potential material for sustainable eco-friendly fashion products. J Nat Fibers 19(9):3275–3287. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.184284110.1080/15440478.2020.1842841 ↗

52. Ražić SE, Čunko R, Bautista L, Bukošek V (2017) Plasma effect on the chemical structure of cellulose fabric for modification of some functional properties. Procedia Eng 200:333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.04710.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.047 ↗

53. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Quintana E, Ibarra D, Gomez N, Ladero M, Eugenio ME, Villar JC (2015) Characterization of purified bacterial cellulose focused on its use on paper restoration. Carbohydr Polym 116:173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.06410.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.064 ↗

54. Shao W, Wu J, Liu H, Ye S, Jiang L, Liu X (2017) Novel bioactive surface functionalization of bacterial cellulose membrane. Carbohydr Polym 178:270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.04510.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.045 ↗

55. Sohbatzadeh F, Shakerinasab E, Eshghabadi M, Ghasemi M (2019) Characterization and performance of coupled atmospheric pressure argon plasma jet with n-hexane electrospray for hydrophobic layer coatings on cotton textile. Diamond Relat Mater 91:34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2018.10.02310.1016/j.diamond.2018.10.023 ↗

56. Song JE, Silva C, Cavaco-Paulo AM, Kim HR (2019) Functionalization of Bacterial Cellulose Nonwoven by Poly(fluorophenol) to Improve Its Hydrophobicity and Durability. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.0033210.3389/fbioe.2019.00332 ↗

57. Sulaeva I, Vejdovszky P, Beaumont M, Rusakov D, Rohrer C, Rosenau T, Potthast A (2019) Fast Approach to the Hydrophobization of Bacterial Cellulose via the Direct Polymerization of Ethyl 2-Cyanoacrylate. Biomacromol 20:3142–3146. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b0072110.1021/acs.biomac.9b00721 ↗

58. Tatarova E, Bundaleska N, Sarrette JPh, Ferreira CM (2014) Plasmas for environmental issues: from hydrogen production to 2D materials assembly. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 23:063002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/23/6/06300210.1088/0963-0252/23/6/063002 ↗

59. Tomé LC, Brandão L, Mendes AM, Silvestre AJD, PascoalNeto C, Gandini A, Freire CSR, Marrucho IM (2010) Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose membranes with tailored surface and barrier properties. Cellulose 17:1203–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9457-z10.1007/s10570-010-9457-z ↗

60. Vilaplana JF, Cabanes SG (2012) Aplicación de la Tecnología de Plasma Polimerización em Sustratos Textiles para Uso Técnico. 3C Tecnol 1(2):6–21

61. Walton J, Alexander MR, Fairley N, Roach P, Shard AG (2016) Film thickness measurement and contamination layer correction for quantitative XPS. Surf Interface Anal 48(3):164–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.593410.1002/sia.5934 ↗

62. Wang T, Xu L, Shen H, Cao X, Wei Q, Ghiladi RA, Wang Q (2020) Photoinactivation of bacteria by hypocrellin-grafted bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 27:991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02852-910.1007/s10570-019-02852-9 ↗

63. Wood J (2019) Bioinspiration in Fashion—A Review. Biomimetics 4(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics401001610.3390/biomimetics4010016 ↗

64. Yan X, Li J, Yi L (2017) Fabrication of pH-responsive hydrophilic/hydrophobic Janus cotton fabric via plasma-induced graft polymerization. Mater Lett 208:46–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.05.02910.1016/j.matlet.2017.05.029 ↗

65. Yim SM, Song JE, Kim HR (2017) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose fabrics by nitrogen sources of tea and carbon sources of sugar. Process Biochem 59:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2016.07.00110.1016/j.procbio.2016.07.001 ↗

66. Zheng J, Yang R, Xie L, Qu J, Liu Y, Li X (2010) Plasma-Assisted Approaches in Inorganic Nanostructure Fabrication. Adv Mater 22(13):1451–1473. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20090314710.1002/adma.200903147 ↗

67. Zille A, Oliveira FR, Souto AP (2014) Plasma Treatment in Textile Industry. Plasma Processes Polym 12(2):98–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.20140005210.1002/ppap.201400052 ↗