Cellulose phosphorylation for cellulose nanofibrils production: impact of curing on the color change and chemical surface characterization
Source abstract
Abstract
International audience ; Cellulose phosphorylation as a pretreatment for CNF production is a robust process allowing to modify the surface charge of the fiber. However, cellulose phosphorylation is associated with a yellowing of the substrate and variations in the grafting of phosphate groups leading to crosslinking during intense curing. In this study, a design of experiment was conducted on a process of paper impregnation to limit the color change and maximize the degree of grafting of cellulose. The impregnation of the substrate was found to occur very rapidly, namely at 10s maximum. Whereas the color change was found to be dependent only on the curing parameters (time and temperature). The charge content model was reduced to 2 variables, i.e., the curing parameters, since the impregnation time was previously established to be very short and complete. Consequently, both models were combined allowing to determine optimal curing parameters: a temperature of 150°C for 20 min., yielding a minimum color change (6.0) and maximum charge content (1.0 mmol/g). Moreover, cellulose phosphorylation was characterized in bulk and surface by XPS and NMR, respectively. It did not reveal crystallinity changes in the pretreated cellulose. 31P NMR allowed the estimation of the amount of crosslinking within cellulose matrix.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Ait Benhamou A, Kassab Z, Nadifiyine M et al (2021) Extraction, characterization and chemical functionalization of phosphorylated cellulose derivatives from Giant reed plant. Cellulose 28:4625–4642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03842-610.1007/s10570-021-03842-6 ↗
2. Banvillet G (2021) Industrial application of pretreatments for obtaining high quality cellulose nanofibrils. PhD Dissertation, Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)
3. Belgacem MN, Czeremuszkin G, Sapieha S, Gandini A (1995) Surface characterization of cellulose fibres by XPS and inverse gas chromatography. Cellulose 2:145–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0081301510.1007/BF00813015 ↗
4. Belosinschi D, Benkaddour A, Tofanica B-M, Ngo T (2021) Phosphorylation of cellulose in the presence of urea mechanism of reaction and reagent impact. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-862264/v110.21203/rs.3.rs-862264/v1 ↗
5. Castillo LA, Barbosa SE (2020) Comparative analysis of crystallization behavior induced by different mineral fillers in polypropylene nanocomposites. NAX 10:184798042092275. https://doi.org/10.1177/184798042092275210.1177/1847980420922752 ↗
6. Dufresne A (2019) Nanocellulose processing properties and potential applications. Curr Rep 5:76–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00088-110.1007/s40725-019-00088-1 ↗
7. Espino-Pérez E, Domenek S, Belgacem N et al (2014) Green process for chemical functionalization of nanocellulose with carboxylic acids. Biomacromolecules 15:4551–4560. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm501345810.1021/bm5013458 ↗
8. Etale A, Onyianta AJ, Eloi J-C et al (2024) Phosphorylated cellulose nanocrystals: optimizing production by decoupling hydrolysis and surface modification. Carbohyd Polym 325:121560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12156010.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121560 ↗
9. Ghanadpour M, Carosio F, Larsson PT, Wågberg L (2015) Phosphorylated cellulose nanofibrils: a renewable nanomaterial for the preparation of intrinsically flame-retardant materials. Biomacromolecules 16:3399–3410. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0111710.1021/acs.biomac.5b01117 ↗
10. Godinot C, Gaysinski M, Thomas OP et al (2016) On the use of 31P NMR for the quantification of hydrosoluble phosphorus-containing compounds in coral host tissues and cultured zooxanthellae. Sci Rep 6:21760. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2176010.1038/srep21760 ↗
11. Haslinger S, Hietala S, Hummel M et al (2019) Solid-state NMR method for the quantification of cellulose and polyester in textile blends. Carbohyd Polym 207:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.05210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.052 ↗
12. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43:3434–3441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.03810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038 ↗
13. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3:71–85. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0NR00583E10.1039/C0NR00583E ↗
14. Iwamoto S, Lee S-H, Endo T (2014) Relationship between aspect ratio and suspension viscosity of wood cellulose nanofibers. Polym J 46:73–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2013.6410.1038/pj.2013.64 ↗
15. Khanjani P, King AWT, Partl GJ et al (2018) Superhydrophobic paper from nanostructured fluorinated cellulose esters. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:11280–11288. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1931010.1021/acsami.7b19310 ↗
16. Kokol V (2015) Characterisation and properties of homo- and heterogenously phosphorylated nanocellulose. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.056 ↗
17. Kono H (2013) 1H and 13C chemical shift assignment of the monomers that comprise carboxymethyl cellulose. Carbohyd Polym 97:384–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.03110.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.031 ↗
18. Kröger M, Badara O, Pääkkönen T et al (2023) Efficient isolation method for highly charged phosphorylated cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.2c0136310.1021/acs.biomac.2c01363 ↗
19. Krum K, Patil R, Christensen H et al (2021) Kinetic modeling of urea decomposition and byproduct formation. Chem Eng Sci 230:116138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.11613810.1016/j.ces.2020.116138 ↗
20. Mnasri A, Dhaouadi H, Khiari R et al (2022) Effects of deep eutectic solvents on cellulosic fibres and paper properties: green “chemical” refining. Carbohyd Polym 292:119606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11960610.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119606 ↗
21. Mokhena TC, John MJ (2020) Cellulose nanomaterials: new generation materials for solving global issues. Cellulose 27:1149–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02889-w10.1007/s10570-019-02889-w ↗
22. Naderi A, Lindström T, Flodberg G et al (2016) Phosphorylated nanofibrillated cellulose: production and properties. NPPRJ 31:20–29. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2016-31-01-p020-02910.3183/npprj-2016-31-01-p020-029 ↗
23. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2014) Rheological properties of micro-/nanofibrillated cellulose suspensions: wall-slip and shear banding phenomena. Carbohyd Polym 112:432–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.09210.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.092 ↗
24. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crop Prod 93:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016 ↗
25. Noguchi Y, Homma I, Matsubara Y (2017) Complete nanofibrillation of cellulose prepared by phosphorylation. Cellulose 24:1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1191-310.1007/s10570-017-1191-3 ↗
26. Rol F, Belgacem MN, Gandini A, Bras J (2019) Recent advances in surface-modified cellulose nanofibrils. Prog Polym Sci 88:241–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.002 ↗
27. Rol F, Sillard C, Bardet M et al (2020) Cellulose phosphorylation comparison and analysis of phosphorate position on cellulose fibers. Carbohyd Polym 229:115294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11529410.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115294 ↗
28. Sannigrahi P, Ingall E (2005) Polyphosphates as a source of enhanced P fluxes in marine sediments overlain by anoxic waters: evidence from 31P NMR. Geochem Trans 6:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-6-5210.1186/1467-4866-6-52 ↗
29. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the x-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175590290100310.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
30. Shi Y, Belosinschi D, Brouillette F et al (2014) Phosphorylation of Kraft fibers with phosphate esters. Carbohyd Polym 106:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.07010.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.070 ↗
31. Zhang S-F, Zhao D-Y, Hou C (2018) Strengthening of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fiber networks with polyamide epichlorohydrin (PAE) resin. Polym Bull 75:5373–5386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-018-2334-x10.1007/s00289-018-2334-x ↗
32. Zhao M, Ono Y, Noguchi Y et al (2022) Comparative characterization of phosphorylated wood holocelluloses and celluloses for nanocellulose production. Cellulose 29:2805–2816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04013-310.1007/s10570-021-04013-3 ↗