Three-Dimensional Extrusion Printed Urinary Specific Grafts: Mechanistic Insights into Buildability and Biophysical Properties
Source abstract
Abstract
The compositional formulations and the optimization of process parameters to fabricate hydrogel scaffolds with urological tissue-mimicking biophysical properties are not yet extensively explored, including a comprehensive assessment of a spectrum of properties, such as mechanical strength, viscoelasticity, antimicrobial property, and cytocompatibility. While addressing this aspect, the present work provides mechanistic insights into process science, to produce shape-fidelity compliant alginate-based biomaterial ink blended with gelatin and synthetic nanocellulose. The composition-dependent pseudoplasticity, viscoelasticity, thixotropy, and gel stability over a longer duration in physiological context have been rationalized in terms of intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions among the biomaterial ink constituents. By varying the hybrid hydrogel ink composition within a narrow compositional window, the resulting hydrogel closely mimics the natural urological tissue-like properties, including tensile stretchability, compressive strength, and biophysical properties. Based on the printability assessment using a critical analysis of gel strength, we have established the buildability of the acellular hydrogel ink and have been successful in fabricating shape-fidelity compliant urological patches or hollow cylindrical grafts using 3D extrusion printing. Importantly, the new hydrogel formulations with good hydrophilicity, support fibroblast cell proliferation and inhibit the growth of Gram-negative E. coli bacteria. These attributes were rationalized in terms of nanocellulose-induced physicochemical changes on the scaffold surface. Taken together, the present study uncovers the process-science-based understanding of the 3D extrudability of the newly formulated alginate-gelatin-nanocellulose-based hydrogels with urological tissue-specific biophysical, cytocompatibility, and antibacterial properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Anatomy and Medical Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
Funding
Science and Engineering Research Board · Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Ministry of Education, India · Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nbt.295810.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
2. 10.1557/s43578-021-00255-w10.1557/s43578-021-00255-w ↗
3. 10.1007/s41745-019-00129-510.1007/s41745-019-00129-5 ↗
4. 10.1038/nbt.341310.1038/nbt.3413 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e0024110.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00241 ↗
6. 10.1039/C7BM00765E10.1039/C7BM00765E ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0008410.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 ↗
8. 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/04410210.1088/1758-5090/7/4/044102 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.07610.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076 ↗
10. 10.1111/ijac.1388510.1111/ijac.13885 ↗
11. 10.1002/adhm.20170026410.1002/adhm.201700264 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20160498310.1002/adma.201604983 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.03810.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038 ↗
15. 10.1088/1758-5082/5/1/01500310.1088/1758-5082/5/1/015003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.03310.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.033 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0056710.1021/acsapm.1c00567 ↗
19. 10.1039/C7PY00826K10.1039/C7PY00826K ↗
20. 10.1039/C9NR07643C10.1039/C9NR07643C ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.8b2017810.1021/acsami.8b20178 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12230510.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122305 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.17210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.172 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nano.2005.10.00310.1016/j.nano.2005.10.003 ↗
25. 10.1093/toxsci/kfg24310.1093/toxsci/kfg243 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.11996410.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119964 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12345010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123450 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12079010.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120790 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.21350110.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213501 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12089510.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120895 ↗
31. 10.1002/mabi.20210041310.1002/mabi.202100413 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.mtla.2022.10154210.1016/j.mtla.2022.101542 ↗
33. 10.1002/adhm.20210020610.1002/adhm.202100206 ↗
34. Ng · Int. J. Bioprinting · 2016 · 2 · 5310.18063/IJB.2016.01.009 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.17410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.174 ↗
36. Shehzad Ahmer · Bioengineering · 2023 · 10 · 70410.3390/bioengineering10060704 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11186610.1016/j.msec.2021.111866 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.01810.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.018 ↗
39. Li Zhao · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 802010.1038/s41598-018-26407-3 ↗
40. Ajalloueian Fatemeh · Nat. Rev. Urology · 2018 · 15 · 15510.1038/nrurol.2018.5 ↗
41. Sun Mengwen · Polymers · 2022 · 14 · 140010.3390/polym14071400 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.surge.2017.07.00210.1016/j.surge.2017.07.002 ↗
43. Sharma Swati · Biomaterials · 2022 · 281 · 12133110.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121331 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.inoche.2022.11005410.1016/j.inoche.2022.110054 ↗
45. Lizundia Erlantz · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2020 · 236 · 11600110.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116001 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.17910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.179 ↗
47. Yao Bin · Biofabrication · 2019 · 11 · 04502010.1088/1758-5090/ab38ef ↗
48. 10.1515/arh-2007-000110.1515/arh-2007-0001 ↗
49. Ribeiro Alexandre · Biofabrication · 2017 · 10 · 01410210.1088/1758-5090/aa90e2 ↗
50. 10.3390/ma1103045410.3390/ma11030454 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11036210.1016/j.matdes.2021.110362 ↗
52. 10.1039/C8BM01246F10.1039/C8BM01246F ↗
53. Dutta Sayan Deb · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2021 · 167 · 64410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.011 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.bprint.2017.12.00110.1016/j.bprint.2017.12.001 ↗
55. 10.1039/D0RA09620B10.1039/D0RA09620B ↗
56. Annamalai Meenakshi · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 576410.1039/C5NR06705G ↗
57. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.05510.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.055 ↗
58. Piras · Biomater. Sci. · 2017 · 5 · 198810.1039/C7BM00510E ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c0151410.1021/acs.biomac.2c01514 ↗
60. Ai Yusen · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2023
61. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0159310.1021/acs.biomac.5b01593 ↗
62. Siqueira G. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2017 · 27 · 160461910.1002/adfm.201604619 ↗
63. Sawkins Michael John · Biofabrication · 2015 · 7 · 03500410.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035004 ↗
64. Pääkkö Marjo · Biomacromolecules · 2007 · 8 · 193410.1021/bm061215p ↗
65. 10.1007/s00192-011-1409-010.1007/s00192-011-1409-0 ↗
66. 10.1002/adhm.20180033410.1002/adhm.201800334 ↗
67. Rzhepishevska Olena · Biomater. Sci. · 2013 · 1 · 58910.1039/c3bm00197k ↗
68. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.04010.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.040 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11097210.1016/j.msec.2020.110972 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.15710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.157 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.04110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.041 ↗
72. Rzhepishevska Olena · Biomater. Sci. · 2013 · 1 · 58910.1039/c3bm00197k ↗
73. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.08410.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.084 ↗
74. Zhang Qianqian · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2022 · 10 · 543910.1039/D2TB00735E ↗
75. Ren Lili · Biomater. Sci. · 2022 · 10 · 317410.1039/D2BM00157H ↗
76. Dadsetan Mahrokh · Acta biomaterialia · 2011 · 7 · 208010.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.012 ↗