A machine learning approach for the prediction of cellulose nanofibril films’ mechanical properties from suspension morphological data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Material Properties and Processing · Digital Image Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Alfaro A, Lopez F, Perez A, García JC, Pelach MA, Mutje P (2013) Influence of operating conditions in sodium hydroxide and anthraquinone pulping on the morphology of cellulose fibers of Tagasaste. Cellul Chem Technol 47(9–10):765–775
2. Almonti D, Baiocco G, Tagliaferri V, Ucciardello N (2019) Artificial neural network in fibers length prediction for high precision control of cellulose refining. Mater 12:3730. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1222373010.3390/ma12223730 ↗
3. Amini E, Hafez I, Tajvidi M, Bousfield DW (2020) Cellulose and lignocellulose nanofibril suspensions and films: a comparison. Carbohydr Polym 250:117011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11701110.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117011 ↗
4. Ang S, Haritos V, Batchelor W (2019) Effect of refining and homogenization on nanocellulose fiber development, sheet strength, and energy consumption. Cellulose 26:4767–4786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02400-510.1007/s10570-019-02400-5 ↗
5. Arashi M, Roozbeh M, Hamzah NA, Gasparini M (2021) Ridge regression and its applications in genetic studies. PLoS ONE 16(4):e0245376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.024537610.1371/journal.pone.0245376 ↗
6. Bennington CPJ, Seth RS (1989) Response of pulp fibers to mechanical treatment during MC fluidization. In: Trans 9th Fundam Res Symp, pp 87–103. https://doi.org/10.15376/frc.1985.1.41310.15376/frc.1985.1.413 ↗
7. Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Cellulose biocomposites—from bulk moldings to nanostructured systems. MRS Bull 35(3):201–207. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2010.65210.1557/mrs2010.652 ↗
8. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
9. Das N, Hafez I, Bousfield DW, Tajvidi M (2024) Enhancement of cellulose nanofibril (CNF) film barrier properties by nanofibril alignment. Cellulose 31(12):7385–7403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-06078-210.1007/s10570-024-06078-2 ↗
10. de Vlaming R, Groenen PJ (2015) The current and future use of ridge regression for prediction in quantitative genetics. Biomed Res Int 2015:143712. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/14371210.1155/2015/143712 ↗
11. Desmaisons J, Boutonnet E, Rueff M, Dufresne A, Bras J (2017) A new quality index for benchmarking of different cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym 174:318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.03210.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.032 ↗
12. Dietterich T (1995) Overfitting and undercomputing in machine learning. ACM Comput Surv 27(3):326–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/212094.21211410.1145/212094.212114 ↗
13. Fardim P, Durán N (2003) Modification of fiber surfaces during pulping and refining as analyzed by SEM, XPS, and ToF-SIMS. Colloids Surf A 223(1–3):263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00149-310.1016/S0927-7757(03)00149-3 ↗
14. Foelkel C (2009) Papermaking properties of eucalyptus trees, woods, and pulp fibers. Eucalyptus Online Book & Newslett 110
15. Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29(5):1189–123210.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
16. Garcia-Gonzalo E, Santos AJ, Martínez-Torres J, Pereira H, Simões R, García-Nieto P, Anjos O (2016) Prediction of five softwood paper properties from its density using support vector machine regression techniques. Bio Res 11(1):1892–1904
17. Hasan I, Wang J, Bousfield D, Tajvidi M (2023) Turning recycled cardboard container-derived lignin-containing cellulose nanofibrils into a robust gas barrier UV-shielding film. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 11(9):3720–3731. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0668310.1021/acssuschemeng.2c06683 ↗
18. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromol 9(6):1579–1585. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800038n10.1021/bm800038n ↗
19. Hirn U, Bauer W (2006) A review of image analysis-based methods to evaluate fiber properties. Lenzing Ber 86(1):96–105
20. Hodson TO (2022) Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): When to use them or not. Geosci Model Dev 15:5481–5490. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5481-202210.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022 ↗
21. Hoerl AE, Kennard RW (1970) Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12(1):55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1970.1048863410.1080/00401706.1970.10488634 ↗
22. Huber P, Carré B, Petit-Conil M (2008) The influence of TMP fiber flexibility on flocculation and formation. BioRes 3(4):1218–1227. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.3.4.1218-122710.15376/biores.3.4.1218-1227 ↗
23. Joutsimo O, Wathén R, Tamminen T (2005) Effects of fiber deformations on pulp sheet properties and fiber strength. Paperi Puu 87(6):392
24. Kidwell JS, Brown LH (1982) Ridge regression as a technique for analyzing models with multicollinearity. J Marriage Fam 44(2):287–299. https://doi.org/10.2307/35153910.2307/351539 ↗
25. Ko CH, Yang CY, Chang FC, Lin LD (2019) Effect of Paenibacillus cellulase pretreatment for fiber surface. J Environ Manag 241:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.13310.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.133 ↗
26. Mayr M, Eckhart R, Bauer W, Thaller A (2017) Characterization of fines quality and their independent effect on sheet properties. In: Adv Pulp Pap Res, Oxford 2017: Transactions of the 16th Fundam Res Symp, pp 299–322. https://doi.org/10.15376/frc.2017.1.29910.15376/frc.2017.1.299 ↗
27. Molnar C (2020) Interpretable machine learning: a guide for making black box models explainable. Self-published
28. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties, and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40(7):3941–3994. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00108B10.1039/C0CS00108B ↗
29. Morais FP, Carta AM, Amaral ME, Curto JM (2021) Micro/nano-fibrillated cellulose (MFC/NFC) fibers as an additive to maximize eucalyptus fibers on tissue paper production. Cellulose 28(10):6587–6605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03912-910.1007/s10570-021-03912-9 ↗
30. Mori R (2023) Replacing all petroleum-based chemical products with natural biomass-based chemical products: a tutorial review. RSC Sustain 1:179–212. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SU00014H10.1039/D2SU00014H ↗
31. Motamedian HR, Halilovic AE, Kulachenko A (2019) Mechanisms of strength and stiffness improvement of paper after PFI refining with a focus on the effect of fines. Cellulose 26:4099–4124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02349-510.1007/s10570-019-02349-5 ↗
32. Muqeet M, Malik H, Panhwar S, Khan IU, Hussain F, Asghar Z, Mahar RB (2023) Enhanced cellulose nanofiber mechanical stability through ionic crosslinking and interpretation of adsorption data using machine learning. Int J Biol Macromol 237:124180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12418010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124180 ↗
33. Nakayama K, Kumagai A, Sakakibara K (2025) Machine learning-assisted sedimentation analysis of cellulose nanofibers to predict the specific surface area. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl. 100697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13890310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138903 ↗
34. Nanocellulose Market Share 2023–2032. GMI Insights. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/nanocellulose-market. Accessed 9 July 2024
35. Özkan M, Karakoç A, Borghei M, Wiklund J, Rojas OJ, Paltakari J (2019) Machine learning-assisted design of tailor-made nanocellulose films: a combination of experimental and computational studies. Polym Compos 40(10):4013–4022. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2526210.1002/pc.25262 ↗
36. Pennells J, Heuberger B, Chaléat C, Martin DJ (2022) Assessing cellulose micro/nanofiber morphology using a high throughput fiber analysis device to predict nanopaper performance. Cellulose 29(4):2599–2616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04405-510.1007/s10570-021-04405-5 ↗
37. Robertson G, Olson J, Allen P, Chan BK, Seth RS (1999) Measurement of fiber length, coarseness, and shape with the fiber quality analyzer. Tappi J 82:93–98
38. Santos AF, Aguado R, Corazza ML, Tarrés Q, Sanchez-Salvador JL, Blanco A, Delgado-Aguilar M (2022) Artificial neural network for aspect ratio prediction of lignocellulosic micro/nanofibers. Cellulose 29(10):5609–5622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04631-510.1007/s10570-022-04631-5 ↗
39. Shen B, Qian B, Tu N (2025) Utilizing AI algorithms to model and optimize the composite of nanocellulose and hydrogels via a new technique. Int J Biol Macromol 290:138903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13890310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138903 ↗
40. Signori-Iamin G, Santos AF, Mazega A, Corazza ML, Aguado RJ, Delgado-Aguilar M (2023) Bayesian-optimized random forest prediction of key properties of micro-/nanofibrillated cellulose from different woody and non-woody feedstocks. Ind Crops Prod 206:117719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11771910.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117719 ↗
41. Sirvio J, Nurminen I (2004) Systematic changes in paper properties caused by fines. Pulp Pap Can 105:39–42
42. Sreedev D, Kurukkal Balakrishnan S, Kalarikkal N (2024) A machine learning aided yield prediction model for the preparation of cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl Eng Mater 2(6):1561–1571. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaenm.4c0011710.1021/acsaenm.4c00117 ↗
43. Tayeb AH, Amini E, Ghasemi S, Tajvidi M (2018) Cellulose nanomaterials—binding properties and applications: a review. Molecules 23(10):2684. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2310268410.3390/molecules23102684 ↗
44. Usov I, Nyström G, Adamcik J, Handschin S, Schütz C, Fall A, Mezzenga R (2015) Understanding nanocellulose chirality and structure–properties relationship at the single fibril level. Nat Commun 6(1):7564. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms856410.1038/ncomms8564 ↗
45. Wang H, Pan X, Ge H, Du Q, Cheng S (2024) Machine learning for the prediction and optimization of production of cellulose nanocrystals by sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Ind Crops Prod 214:118575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.11857510.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118575 ↗