journal article·2009-12

Mechanical and structural properties of native and alkali-treated bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524

Brigid A. McKenna, Deirdre Mikkelsen, J. Bernhard Wehr, Michael J. Gidley, Neal W. Menzies

Cellulose· Volume 16· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Mechanical properties of hydrated bacterial cellulose have been tested as a function of fermentation time and following the alkali treatment required for sterilisation prior to biomedical applications. Bacterial cellulose behaves as a viscoelastic material, with brittle failure reached at approximately 20% strain and 1.5 MPa stress under uniaxial tension. Treatment with 0.1 M NaOH resulted in minimal effects on the mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose. Fermentation time had a large effect on both bacterial numbers and cellulose yield but only minor effects on mechanical properties, showing that the fermentation system is a robust method for producing cellulose with predictable materials properties. The failure zone in uniaxial tension was shown to be associated with large-scale fibre alignment, consistent with this being the major determinant of mechanical properties. Under uniaxial tension, elastic moduli and failure stresses are an order of magnitude lower than those obtained under biaxial tension, consistent with the fibre alignment mechanism which is not available under biaxial tension.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls · Enzyme Production and Characterization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Astley OM, Chanliaud E, Donald AM, Gidley MJ (2001) Structure of Acetobacter cellulose composites in the hydrated state. Int J Biol Macromol 29:193–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-8130(01)00167-210.1016/S0141-8130(01)00167-2 ↗
2. Astley OM, Chanliaud E, Donald AM, Gidley MJ (2003) Tensile deformation of bacterial cellulose composites. Int J Biol Macromol 32:28–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-8130(03)00022-910.1016/S0141-8130(03)00022-9 ↗
3. Backdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Johansson BR, Risberg B, Gatenholm P (2006) Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27:2141–2149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.02610.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.026 ↗
4. Cannon RE, Anderson SM (1991) Biogenesis of bacterial cellulose. Crit Rev Microbiol 17:435–447. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841910911520710.3109/10408419109115207 ↗
5. Chanliaud E, Gidley MJ (1999) In vitro synthesis and properties of pectin/Acetobacter xylinus cellulose composites. Plant J 20:25–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00571.x10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00571.x ↗
6. Chanliaud E, Burrows KM, Jeronimidis G, Gidley MJ (2002) Mechanical properties of primary plant cell wall analogues. Planta 215:989–996. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00425-002-0783-810.1007/s00425-002-0783-8 ↗
7. Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM (2007) The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8:1–1210.1021/bm060620d ↗
8. Dammstrom S, Gatenholm P (2006) Preparation and properties of cellulose/xylan nanocomposites. In: Stokke DD, Groom LH (eds) Characterization of the cellulosic cell wall. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, pp 53–6410.1002/9780470999714.ch5 ↗
9. GenStat (2003) GenStat for Windows. Release 7.2, 7th edn. VSN International Ltd, Oxford
10. George J, Ramana K, Sabapathy S, Bawa A (2005a) Physico-mechanical properties of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) cellulose membrane. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:1323–1327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/S11274-005-3574-010.1007/s11274-005-3574-0 ↗
11. George J, Ramana KV, Sabapathy SN, Jagannath JH, Bawa AS (2005b) Characterisation of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinus) biopolymer: some thermo-mechanical properties. Int J Biol Macromol 37:189–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.10.00710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.10.007 ↗
12. Hamad WY (1998) On the mechanisms of cumulative damage and fracture in native cellulose fibres. J Mater Sci Lett 17:433–436. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100655572218810.1023/A:1006555722188 ↗
13. Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum 2. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58:345–35210.1042/bj0580345 ↗
14. Hsieh YC, Yano H, Nogi M, Eichhorn SJ (2008) An estimation of the Young’s modulus of bacterial cellulose filaments. Cellulose 15:507–513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10570-008-9206-810.1007/s10570-008-9206-8 ↗
15. Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A (2000) Bacterial cellulose—a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci 35:261–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100477522914910.1023/A:1004775229149 ↗
16. Ishikawa A, Okano T, Sugiyama J (1997) Fine structure and tensile properties of ramie fibres in the crystalline form of cellulose I, II, IIII and IVI. Polymer 38:463–468. doi: https://doi.org/S0032-3861(96)00516-210.1016/S0032-3861(96)00516-2 ↗
17. Jonas R, Farah LF (1998) Production and application of microbial cellulose. Polym Degrad Stabil 59:101–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00197-310.1016/S0141-3910(97)00197-3 ↗
18. Kersters K, Lisdiyanti P, Komagata K, Swings J (2006) The Family Acetobacteraceae: the Genera Acetobacter, Acidomonas, Asaia, Gluconacetobacter, Gluconobacter, and Kozakia. In The Prokaryotes. Springer, New York, pp 163–200
19. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:3358–3393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20046058710.1002/anie.200460587 ↗
20. Nakayama A, Kakugo A, Gong JP, Osada Y, Takai M, Erata T, Kawano S (2004) High mechanical strength double-network hydrogel with bacterial cellulose. Adv Funct Mater 14:1124–1128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20030519710.1002/adfm.200305197 ↗
21. Nishi Y, Uryu M, Yamanaka S, Watanabe K, Kitamura N, Iguchi M, Mitsuhashi S (1990) The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose 2. Improvement of the mechanical properties of sheets and their applicability to diaphragms of electroacoustic transducers. J Mater Sci 25:2997–3001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0058491710.1007/BF00584917 ↗
22. Nishino T, Takano K, Nakamae K (1995) Elastic modulus of the crystalline regions of cellulose polymorphs. J Polymer Sci B Polymer Phys 33:1647–1651. doi: 0887-6266/95/111647-0510.1002/polb.1995.090331110 ↗
23. Putra A, Kakugo A, Furukawa H, Gong JP, Osada Y, Uemura T, Yamamoto M (2008) Production of bacterial cellulose with well oriented fibril on PDMS substrate. Polym J 40:137–142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.PJ200718010.1295/polymj.PJ2007180 ↗
24. Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M (1991) Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 55:35–58. doi: https://doi.org/0146-0749/91/010035-2410.1128/MMBR.55.1.35-58.1991 ↗
25. Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL, Brittberg M, Gatenholm P (2005) Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 26:419–431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.04910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.049 ↗
26. Tokoh C, Takabe K, Sugiyama J, Fujita M (2002) Cellulose synthesized by Acetobacter xylinum in the presence of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Cellulose 9:65–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101582712192710.1023/A:1015827121927 ↗
27. Touzel JP, Chabbert B, Monties B, Debeire P, Cathala B (2003) Synthesis and characterization of dehydrogenation polymers in Gluconacetobacter xylinus cellulose and cellulose/pectin composite. J Agric Food Chem 51:981–986. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf020200p10.1021/jf020200p ↗
28. Vincent J (1990) Structural biomaterials. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
29. Wharton DA (1991) Freeze substitution techniques for preparing nematodes for scanning electron microscopy. J Microsc (Oxf) 164:187–19610.1111/j.1365-2818.1991.tb03207.x ↗
30. Whitney SEC, Brigham JE, Darke AH, Reid JSG, Gidley MJ (1995) In vitro assembly of cellulose/xyloglucan networks—ultrastructural and molecular aspects. Plant J 8:491–504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.8040491.x10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.8040491.x ↗
31. Yamada Y, Hoshino K, Ishikawa T (1997) Taxonomic studies of acetic acid bacteria and allied organisms.11. The phylogeny of acetic acid bacteria based on the partial sequences of 16S ribosomal RNA: the elevation of the subgenus Gluconoacetobacter to the generic level. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 61:1244–125110.1271/bbb.61.1244 ↗