journal article·2020-08Open access

Enhancing packaging board properties using micro- and nanofibers prepared from recycled board

Ossi Laitinen, Terhi Suopajärvi, Henrikki Liimatainen

Cellulose· Volume 27· Issue 12

Abstract

Abstract In this study, cellulose microfibers and cellulose nanofibers (CNF) prepared from recycled boxboard pulp using a mechanical fine friction grinder were used as reinforcements in a board sheet. Micro- and nanofibers manufactured by mechanical grinding have typically broad particle size distribution, and they can contain both micro- and nano-sized fibrils. Deep eutectic solvent of choline chloride and urea was used as a non-hydrolytic pretreatment medium for the CNF, and reference CNF were used without any chemical pretreatment. The CNF were ground using three grinding levels (grinding time) and their dosage in the board varied from 2 to 6 wt%. The results indicate that the board properties could be tailored to obtain a balance between the processability and quality of the products by adjusting the amount of CNF that was added (2–6 wt%). A preliminary cost assessment indicated that the most economical way to enhance the board strength properties was to add around 4% of CNF with a moderate grinding level (i.e., grinding energy of 3–4 kWh/kg). Overall, the strength properties of the manufactured board sheets improved by several dozen percentages when CNF was used as the reinforcement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Ämmälä A, Laitinen O, Sirviö JA, Liimatainen H (2019) Key role of mild sulfonation of pine sawdust in the production of lignin containing microfibrillated cellulose by ultrafine wet grinding. Ind Crops Prod 140:111664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.11166410.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111664 ↗
2. Bossu J, Eckhart R, Czibula C et al (2019) Fine cellulosic materials produced from chemical pulp: the combined effect of morphology and rate of addition on paper properties. Nanomaterials 9:321. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano903032110.3390/nano9030321 ↗
3. Brodin FW, Eriksen Ø (2015) Preparation of individualised lignocellulose microfibrils based on thermomechanical pulp and their effect on paper properties. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 30:443–451. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2015-30-03-p443-45110.3183/npprj-2015-30-03-p443-451 ↗
4. da Costa Correia V, dos Santos V, Sain M et al (2016) Grinding process for the production of nanofibrillated cellulose based on unbleached and bleached bamboo organosolv pulp. Cellulose 23:2971–2987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0996-910.1007/s10570-016-0996-9 ↗
5. Delgado-Aguilar M, González I, Pèlach MA et al (2015a) Improvement of deinked old newspaper/old magazine pulp suspensions by means of nanofibrillated cellulose addition. Cellulose 22:789–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0473-210.1007/s10570-014-0473-2 ↗
6. Delgado-Aguilar M, González Tovar I, Tarrés Q et al (2015b) Approaching a low-cost production of cellulose nanofibers for papermaking applications. BioResources. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.3.5345-535510.15376/biores.10.3.5345-5355 ↗
7. Djafari Petroudy SR, Syverud K, Chinga-Carrasco G et al (2014) Effects of bagasse microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyacrylamide on key properties of bagasse paper. Carbohydr Polym 99:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.07.07310.1016/j.carbpol.2013.07.073 ↗
8. Eriksen Ø, Syverud K, Gregersen Ø (2008) The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 23:299–30410.3183/npprj-2008-23-03-p299-304 ↗
9. González I, Vilaseca F, Alcalá M et al (2013) Effect of the combination of biobeating and NFC on the physico-mechanical properties of paper. Cellulose 20:1425–1435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9927-110.1007/s10570-013-9927-1 ↗
10. Hassan EA, Hassan ML, Oksman K (2011) Improving bagasse pulp paper sheet properties with microfibrillated cellulose isolated from xylanase-treated bagasse. Wood Fiber Sci 43:76–82
11. Hassan ML, Bras J, Mauret E et al (2015) Palm rachis microfibrillated cellulose and oxidized-microfibrillated cellulose for improving paper sheets properties of unbeaten softwood and bagasse pulps. Ind Crops Prod 64:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.00410.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.004 ↗
12. Hellström P, Hejnesson-Hulten A, Paulson M et al (2014) Fenton pre-treated microfibrillated cellulose evaluated as a strength enhancer in the middle ply of paperboard. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:732–74010.3183/npprj-2014-29-04-p732-740 ↗
13. Hietala M, Ämmälä A, Silvennoinen J, Liimatainen H (2016) Fluting medium strengthened by periodate–chlorite oxidized nanofibrillated celluloses. Cellulose 23:427–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0801-110.1007/s10570-015-0801-1 ↗
14. Hietala M, Varrio K, Berglund L et al (2018) Potential of municipal solid waste paper as raw material for production of cellulose nanofibres. Waste Manag 80:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.03310.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.033 ↗
15. Hii C, Gregersen ØW, Chinga-Carrasco G, Eriksen Ø (2012) The effect of MFC on the pressability and paper properties of TMP and GCC based sheets. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27:38810.3183/npprj-2012-27-02-p388-396 ↗
16. Kamel S (2007) Nanotechnology and its applications in lignocellulosic composites, a mini review. Express Polym Lett 1:546–575. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.7810.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.78 ↗
17. Kangas H, Lahtinen P, Sneck A et al (2014) Characterization of fibrillated celluloses. A short review and evaluation of characteristics with a combination of methods. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:129–14310.3183/npprj-2014-29-01-p129-143 ↗
18. Katz S, Beatson RP, Scallan AM (1984) The determination of strong and weak acidic groups in sulfite pulps. Sven Papperstidning 87:R48–R53
19. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S et al (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20100127310.1002/anie.201001273 ↗
20. Laitinen O, Suopajärvi T, Österberg M, Liimatainen H (2017) Hydrophobic, superabsorbing aerogels from choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvent pretreated and silylated cellulose nanofibrils for selective oil removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:25029–25037. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0630410.1021/acsami.7b06304 ↗
21. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose—its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90:735–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.02610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 ↗
22. Li P, Sirviö JA, Haapala A, Liimatainen H (2017) Cellulose nanofibrils from nonderivatizing urea-based deep eutectic solvent pretreatments. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:2846–2855. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1362510.1021/acsami.6b13625 ↗
23. Li P, Sirviö JA, Asante B, Liimatainen H (2018) Recyclable deep eutectic solvent for the production of cationic nanocelluloses. Carbohydr Polym 199:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.02410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.024 ↗
24. Mashkour M, Afra E, Resalati H, Mashkour M (2015) Moderate surface acetylation of nanofibrillated cellulose for the improvement of paper strength and barrier properties. RSC Adv 5:60179–60187. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA08161K10.1039/C5RA08161K ↗
25. Missoum K, Martoïa F, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2013) Effect of chemically modified nanofibrillated cellulose addition on the properties of fiber-based materials. Ind Crops Prod 48:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.01310.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.013 ↗
26. Nourbakhsh A, Ashori A (2010) Particleboard made from waste paper treated with maleic anhydride. Waste Manag Res 28:51–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X0933646310.1177/0734242X09336463 ↗
27. Ojala J, Visanko M, Laitinen O et al (2018) Emulsion stabilization with functionalized cellulose nanoparticles fabricated using deep eutectic solvents. Molecules 23:2765. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2311276510.3390/molecules23112765 ↗
28. Rattaz A, Mishra SP, Chabot B, Daneault C (2011) Cellulose nanofibres by sonocatalysed-TEMPO-oxidation. Cellulose 18:585–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9529-810.1007/s10570-011-9529-8 ↗
29. Rojo E, Peresin MS, Sampson WW et al (2015) Comprehensive elucidation of the effect of residual lignin on the physical, barrier, mechanical and surface properties of nanocellulose films. Green Chem 17:1853–1866. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4GC02398F10.1039/C4GC02398F ↗
30. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2013) Nanofibrillated cellulose for enhancement of strength in high-density paper structures. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 28:182–18910.3183/npprj-2013-28-02-p182-189 ↗
31. Selkälä T, Sirviö JA, Lorite GS, Liimatainen H (2016) Anionically stabilized cellulose nanofibrils through succinylation pretreatment in urea-lithium chloride deep eutectic solvent. Chemsuschem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20160090310.1002/cssc.201600903 ↗
32. Singh BS, Lobo HR, Shankarling GS (2012) Choline chloride based eutectic solvents: magical catalytic system for carbon-carbon bond formation in the rapid synthesis of β-hydroxy functionalized derivatives. Catal Commun 24:70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2012.03.02110.1016/j.catcom.2012.03.021 ↗
33. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y ↗
34. Sirviö JA (2018) Cationization of lignocellulosic fibers with betaine in deep eutectic solvent: facile route to charge stabilized cellulose and wood nanofibers. Carbohydr Polym 198:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.05110.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.051 ↗
35. Sirviö JA, Visanko M, Liimatainen H (2015) Deep eutectic solvent system based on choline chloride-urea as a pre-treatment for nanofibrillation of wood cellulose. Green Chem 17:3401–3406. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5GC00398A10.1039/C5GC00398A ↗
36. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ et al (2010) The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: water interactions and physical properties for packaging applications. Cellulose 17:835–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9424-810.1007/s10570-010-9424-8 ↗
37. Su J, Zhang L, Batchelor W, Garnier G (2014) Paper engineered with cellulosic additives: effect of length scale. Cellulose 21:2901–2911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0298-z10.1007/s10570-014-0298-z ↗
38. Suopajärvi T, Sirviö JA, Liimatainen H (2017) Nanofibrillation of deep eutectic solvent-treated paper and board cellulose pulps. Carbohydr Polym 169:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.00910.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.009 ↗
39. Tajik M, Torshizi HJ, Resalati H, Hamzeh Y (2018) Effects of cationic starch in the presence of cellulose nanofibrils on structural, optical and strength properties of paper from soda bagasse pulp. Carbohydr Polym 194:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.02610.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.026 ↗
40. Visanko M, Sirviö JA, Piltonen P et al (2017) Mechanical fabrication of high-strength and redispersible wood nanofibers from unbleached groundwood pulp. Cellulose 24:4173–4187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1406-710.1007/s10570-017-1406-7 ↗