Flexible, Suturable, and Leak-free Scaffolds for Vascular Tissue Engineering Using Melt Spinning
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Coronary artery disease affects millions worldwide. Bypass surgery remains the gold standard; however, autologous tissue is not always available. Hence, the need for an off-the-shelf graft to treat these patients remains extremely high. Using melt spinning, we describe here the fabrication of tubular scaffolds composed of microfibers aligned in the circumferential orientation mimicking the organized extracellular matrix in the tunica media of arteries. By variation of the translational extruder speed, the angle between fibers ranged from 0 to ∼30°. Scaffolds with the highest angle showed the best performance in a three-point bending test. These constructs could be bent up to 160% strain without kinking or breakage. Furthermore, when liquid was passed through the scaffolds, no leakage was observed. Suturing of native arteries was successful. Mesenchymal stromal cells were seeded on the scaffolds and differentiated into vascular smooth muscle-like cells (vSMCs) by reduction of serum and addition of transforming growth factor beta 1 and ascorbic acid. The scaffolds with a higher angle between fibers showed increased expression of vSMC markers alpha smooth muscle actin, calponin, and smooth muscle protein 22-alpha, whereas a decrease in collagen 1 expression was observed, indicating a positive contractile phenotype. Endothelial cells were seeded on the repopulated scaffolds and formed a tightly packed monolayer on the luminal side. Our study shows a one-step fabrication for ECM-mimicking scaffolds with good handleability, leak-free property, and suturability; the excellent biocompatibility allowed the growth of a bilayered construct. Future work will explore the possibility of using these scaffolds as vascular conduits in in vivo settings.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
Funding
Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat · RegMedXB
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12471-013-0504-x10.1007/s12471-013-0504-x ↗
2. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht33010.1093/eurheartj/eht330 ↗
3. 10.3390/app907127410.3390/app9071274 ↗
4. 10.1096/fasebj.12.1.4710.1096/fasebj.12.1.47 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.03710.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.037 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.284.5413.48910.1126/science.284.5413.489 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.05610.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.056 ↗
8. 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.026410.1089/ten.tec.2014.0264 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11957710.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119577 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.02010.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.020 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.0c0660910.1021/acsami.0c06609 ↗
12. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0034010.3389/fbioe.2019.00340 ↗
13. 10.1038/nm.282110.1038/nm.2821 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10807910.1016/j.matdes.2019.108079 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.21297210.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212972 ↗
16. 10.1155/2015/43487610.1155/2015/434876 ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.abl388810.1126/sciadv.abl3888 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.024 ↗
19. 10.1002/jbm.b.3407610.1002/jbm.b.34076 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20190598710.1002/adfm.201905987 ↗
21. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab47f010.1088/1758-5090/ab47f0 ↗
22. 10.1007/s13758-011-0013-710.1007/s13758-011-0013-7 ↗
23. 10.1002/mame.20220009710.1002/mame.202200097 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.03610.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.036 ↗
25. 10.1101/2023.04.17.53719210.1101/2023.04.17.537192 ↗
26. 10.3389/fmats.2020.0022010.3389/fmats.2020.00220 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00441-008-0654-010.1007/s00441-008-0654-0 ↗
28. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.00173910.1074/jbc.RA118.001739 ↗
29. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.79573210.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.795732 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.03.00410.1016/j.jvs.2013.03.004 ↗
31. 10.1002/jbm.a.3202310.1002/jbm.a.32023 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.024 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.019 ↗
34. 10.1002/jbm.a.3205210.1002/jbm.a.32052 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0042410.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00424 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.07810.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.078 ↗
37. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0008710.3389/fbioe.2019.00087 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.00510.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.005 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.00710.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.007 ↗
40. 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.018510.1089/ten.tea.2020.0185 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.00510.1016/j.msec.2017.11.005 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.031 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.052 ↗
44. 10.1088/1758-5090/aca3d410.1088/1758-5090/aca3d4 ↗
45. 10.1039/C9BM00887J10.1039/C9BM00887J ↗
46. 10.1039/D1BM00859E10.1039/D1BM00859E ↗
47. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.04910.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.049 ↗