Barrier coatings with various types of cellulose nanofibrils and their barrier properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Needs for biodegradable packaging materials are growing to reduce the negative environmental impact of petroleum-based polymer packaging. Barrier paper packaging is in demand as environmentally-friendly barrier coating materials to improve biodegradability and recyclability. Cellulose nanofibril (CNF) is considered an alternative to conventional polymers for barrier coatings due to the barrier properties of its films. In this work, various types of CNFs were prepared and coated on linerboard and wood-free paper to evaluate the barrier properties of these papers against air, liquid water, water vapor, oxygen, and grease, and the major factors of the barrier performance of the CNFs-based coatings were investigated. A coat weight of at least 10 g/m2 was desirable to impart efficient the barrier properties to papers. The average fibril size and hydrophobicity were strongly related to the barrier properties. CNFs with smaller fibril sizes are beneficial for enhancing barrier properties, and hydrophobization improves the water resistance. Hydrophobic functional groups with sufficient chain lengths decreased the water vapor barrier properties. The average fibril diameter of CNFs may be related to the air resistance, oxygen barrier properties, and grease resistance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Lignin and Wood Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Abe K, Nakatsubo F, Yano H (2009) High-strength nanocomposite based on fibrillated chemi-thermomechanical pulp. Compos Sci Technol 69:2434–2437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2009.06.015 ↗
2. Aulin C, Gällstedt M, Lindström T (2010) Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 17:559–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y ↗
3. Aulin C, Salazar-Alvarez G, Lindström T (2012) High strength, flexible and transparent nanofibrillated cellulose–nanoclay biohybrid films with tunable oxygen and water vapor permeability. Nanoscale 4:6622–6628. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2NR31726E10.1039/C2NR31726E ↗
4. Bedane AH, Eić M, Farmahini-Farahani M, Xiao H (2015) Water vapor transport properties of regenerated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose films. J Membr Sci 493:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.00910.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.009 ↗
5. Belbekhouche S, Bras J, Siqueira G, Chappey C, Lebrun L, Khelifi B, Marais S, Dufresne A (2011) Water sorption behavior and gas barrier properties of cellulose whiskers and microfibrils films. Carbohydr Polym 83:1740–1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.03610.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.036 ↗
6. Chinga-Carrasco G, Kuznetsova N, Garaeva M, Leirset I, Galiullina G, Kostochko A, Syverud K (2012) Bleached and unbleached MFC nanobarriers: properties and hydrophobisation with hexamethyldisilazane. J Nanopart Res 14:1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1280-z10.1007/s11051-012-1280-z ↗
7. Efferth T, Paul NW (2017) Threats to human health by great ocean garbage patches. Lancet Planet Health 1:e301–e303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30140-710.1016/S2542-5196(17)30140-7 ↗
8. Ferrer A, Quintana E, Filpponen I, Solala I, Vidal T, Rodríguez A, Laine J, Rojas OJ (2012) Effect of residual lignin and heteropolysaccharides in nanofibrillar cellulose and nanopaper from wood fibers. Cellulose 19:2179–2193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9788-z10.1007/s10570-012-9788-z ↗
9. Ferrer A, Pal L, Hubbe M (2017) Nanocellulose in packaging: advances in barrier layer technologies. Ind Crops Prod 95:574–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.01210.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.012 ↗
10. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromol 10:162–165. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm801065u10.1021/bm801065u ↗
11. Fukuzumi H, Fujisawa S, Saito T, Isogai A (2013) Selective permeation of hydrogen gas using cellulose nanofibril film. Biomacromol 14:1705–1709. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400377e10.1021/bm400377e ↗
12. Goo S, Park H, Yook S, Park SY, Youn HJ (2018) Preparation of hydrophobized cellulose nanofibril film with high strength using AKD. J Korea TAPPI 50(6):34–41. https://doi.org/10.7584/JKTAPPI.2018.12.50.6.3410.7584/JKTAPPI.2018.12.50.6.34 ↗
13. Herrera M, Thitiwutthisakul K, Yang X, Rujitanaroj P-o, Rojas R, Berglund L (2018) Preparation and evaluation of high-lignin content cellulose nanofibrils from eucalyptus pulp. Cellulose 25:3121–3133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1764-910.1007/s10570-018-1764-9 ↗
14. Hubbe MA, Ferrer A, Tyagi P, Yin Y, Salas C, Pal L, Rojas OJ (2017) Nanocellulose in thin films, coatings, and plies for packaging applications: a review. BioResources 12(1):2143–223310.15376/biores.12.1.2143-2233 ↗
15. Hult E-L, Iotti M, Lenes M (2010) Efficient approach to high barrier packaging using microfibrillar cellulose and shellac. Cellulose 17:575–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9408-810.1007/s10570-010-9408-8 ↗
16. Im W, Lee S, Rajabi Abhari A, Youn HJ, Lee HL (2018) Optimization of carboxymethylation reaction as a pretreatment for production of cellulose nanofibrils. Cellulose 25:3873–3883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1853-910.1007/s10570-018-1853-9 ↗
17. Kumar V, Bollström R, Yang A, Chen Q, Chen G, Salminen P, Bousfield D, Toivakka M (2014) Comparison of nano-and microfibrillated cellulose films. Cellulose 21:3443–3456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0357-510.1007/s10570-014-0357-5 ↗
18. Kumar V, Elfving A, Koivula H, Bousfield D, Toivakka M (2016) Roll-to-roll processed cellulose nanofiber coatings. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:3603–3613. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0041710.1021/acs.iecr.6b00417 ↗
19. Kumar V, Koppolu VR, Bousfield D, Toivakka M (2017) Substrate role in coating of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions. Cellulose 24:1247–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s105070-017-1201-510.1007/s105070-017-1201-5 ↗
20. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose—its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90:735–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.02610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 ↗
21. Lavoine N, Bras J, Desloges I (2014) Mechanical and barrier properties of cardboard and 3D packaging coated with microfibrillated cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 131:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4010610.1002/app.40106 ↗
22. Leja K, Lewandowicz G (2010) Polymer biodegradation and biodegradable polymers—a review. Pol J Environ Stud 19:255–266
23. Mousavi SMM, Afra E, Tajvidi M, Bousfield DW, Dehghani-Firouzabadi M (2017) Cellulose nanofiber/carboxymethyl cellulose blends as an efficient coating to improve the structure and barrier properties of paperboard. Cellulose 24:3001–3014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1299-510.1007/s10570-017-1299-5 ↗
24. Mousavi SMM, Afra E, Tajividi M, Bousfield DW, Dehghani-Firouzabadi M (2018) Application of cellulose nanofibril (CNF) as coating on paperboard at moderate solids content and high coating speed using blade coater. Prog Org Coat 122:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.05.02410.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.05.024 ↗
25. Okubayashi S, Griesser UJ, Bechtold T (2004) A kinetic study of moisture sorption and desorption on lyocell fibers. Carbohydr Polym 58:293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.07.00410.1016/j.carbpol.2004.07.004 ↗
26. Ottesen V, Kumar V, Toivakka M, Carrasco Gary C, Syverud K, Gregersen Øyvind W (2017) Viability and properties of roll-to-roll coating of cellulose nanofibrils on recycled paperboard. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 32:179. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2017-32-02-p179-18810.3183/npprj-2017-32-02-p179-188 ↗
27. Peresin MS, Kammiovirta K, Heikkinen H, Johansson L-S, Vartiainen J, Setälä H, Österberg M, Tammelin T (2017) Understanding the mechanisms of oxygen diffusion through surface functionalized nanocellulose films. Carbohydr Polym 174:309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.06610.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.066 ↗
28. Riley A (2012) Paper and paperboard packaging. In: Emblem A, Emblem H (eds) Packaging technology: fundamentals, materials and processes, 1st edn. Woodhaed Publishing, Cambridge.
29. Rodionova G, Lenes M, Eriksen Ø, Gregersen Ø (2011) Surface chemical modification of microfibrillated cellulose: improvement of barrier properties for packaging applications. Cellulose 18:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9474-y10.1007/s10570-010-9474-y ↗
30. Roilo D, Maestri CA, Scarpa M, Bettotti P, Egger W, Koschine T, Brusa RS, Checchetto R (2017) Cellulose nanofibrils films: molecular diffusion through elongated sub-nano cavities. J Phys Chem C 121(28):15437–15447. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0289510.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02895 ↗
31. Rojo E, Peresin MS, Sampson WW, Hoeger IC, Vartiainen J, Laine J, Rojas OJ (2015) Comprehensive elucidation of the effect of residual lignin on the physical, barrier, mechanical and surface properties of nanocellulose films. Green Chem 17:1853–1866. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4gc02398f10.1039/c4gc02398f ↗
32. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 7:1687–1691. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060154s10.1021/bm060154s ↗
33. Smith M, Love DC, Rochman CM, Neff RA (2018) Microplastics in seafood and the implications for human health. Curr Environ Health Rep 5:375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-018-0206-z10.1007/s40572-018-0206-z ↗
34. Solala I, Bordes R, Larsson A (2018) Water vapor mass transport across nanofibrillated cellulose films: effect of surface hydrophobization. Cellulose 25:347–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1608-z10.1007/s10570-017-1608-z ↗
35. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Pawlak JJ, Hubbe MA (2011) Water vapor barreir properties of coated and filled microfibrillated cellulose composite films. BioResources 6:4370–488810.15376/biores.6.4.4370-4388 ↗
36. Tarres Q, Oliver-Ortega H, Llop M, Pelach MA, Delgado-Aguilar M, Mutje P (2016) Effective and simple methodology to produce nanocellulose-based aerogels for selective oil removal. Cellulose 23:3077–3088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1017-810.1007/s10570-016-1017-8 ↗
37. Tayeb AH, Tajvidi M (2019) Sustainable barrier systen via self-assembly of colloidal montrnorrilonite and cross-linking resins on nanocellulose interfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:1604–1605. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1665910.1021/acsami.8b16659 ↗
38. Wågberg L, Decher G, Norgren M, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Axnas K (2008) The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir 24:784–795. https://doi.org/10.1021/la702481v10.1021/la702481v ↗
39. Wang J, Gardner DJ, Stark NM, Bousfield DW, Tajvidi M, Cai Z (2018) Moisture and oxygen barrier properties of cellulose nanomaterial-based films. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6(1):49–70. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0352310.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03523 ↗
40. Washburn EW (1921) The dynamics of capillary flow. Phys Rev 17:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.17.27310.1103/PhysRev.17.273 ↗
41. Yang Q, Takeuchi M, Saito T, Isogai A (2014) Formation of nanosized islands of dialkyl beta-ketoester bonds for efficient hydrophobization of a cellulose film surface. Langmuir 30:8109–8118. https://doi.org/10.1021/la501706t10.1021/la501706t ↗
42. Zanini M, Lavoratti A, Lazzari LK, Galiotto D, Pagnocelli M, Baldasso C, Zattera AJ (2017) Producing aerogels from silanized cellulose nanofiber suspension. Cellulose 24:769–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1142-410.1007/s10570-016-1142-4 ↗
43. Zhang Z, Tingaut P, Rentsch D, Zimmermann T, Sebe G (2015) Controlled silylation of nanofibrillated cellulose in water: reinforcement of a model polydimethylsiloxane network. Chemsuschem 8:2681–2690. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20150052510.1002/cssc.201500525 ↗