Electromagnetic Interference Shielding of Carbon Nanotube and Carbon Fiber Laminates: Approach for Layup Optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Carbon nanotube (CNT) and carbon fiber hybrid laminates have demonstrated tailorable electromagnetic interference (EMI) attenuation capabilities governed more by laminate architecture than CNT content. In this study, CNT sheets with an areal density of 8 g m −2 were incorporated into unidirectional prepreg with IM7 fibers and CYCOM 5250‐4 bismaleimide resin in various layup configurations. EMI shielding effectiveness was measured using the transmission‐line method. Placing fewer CNT layers near the neutral plane yielded higher shielding effectiveness results than placing more CNT layers within a few skin depths of the laminate surface. A mechanism for this unexpected behavior is proposed. Simulations of shielding properties were performed with Ansys HFSS to design laminate layups that optimize EMI shielding performance. The optimized layup achieved nearly 30% greater shielding effectiveness over the unoptimized laminates while using fewer CNT layers. Furthermore, flexural testing indicated minimal impacts on mechanical properties with the addition of CNT layers. This work shows that EMI shielding effectiveness can depend more on intentional layup designs than on the quantity of shielding material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
FAMU‐FSU College of Engineering Tallahassee Florida USA
High Performance Materials Institute Tallahassee Florida USA
Funding
National Aeronautics and Space Administration · U.S. Department of Defense · National Science Foundation · Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0021810.1021/acsomega.8b00218 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10690610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106906 ↗
3. 10.1002/app.2981210.1002/app.29812 ↗
4. 10.1002/smll.20230899210.1002/smll.202308992 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.05.00210.1016/j.paerosci.2014.05.002 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20120419610.1002/adma.201204196 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.05810.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.058 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.016 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.03.03210.1016/j.synthmet.2015.03.032 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10769910.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107699 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.04110.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.041 ↗
12. 10.1088/0957‐4484/18/27/27570810.1088/0957‐4484/18/27/275708 ↗
13. 10.3934/matersci.2019.5.75610.3934/matersci.2019.5.756 ↗
14. C.Jolowsky “Carbon Fiber/Carbon Nanotube Hybrid Composite Manufacturing Mechanical Property and Microstructure Characterization Study for High‐Performance Structural Applications”(PhD diss. Florida State University 2022) https://purl.lib.fsu.edu/diginole/2022_Jolowsky_fsu_0071E_17118.
15. 10.3390/nano1010202310.3390/nano10102023 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10635910.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106359 ↗
17. 10.1007/s13391‐022‐00382‐410.1007/s13391‐022‐00382‐4 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11167410.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111674 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.7085810.1002/pc.70858 ↗
20. 10.3390/polym1423522410.3390/polym14235224 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2872410.1002/pc.28724 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mseb.2025.11798010.1016/j.mseb.2025.117980 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10884210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108842 ↗
24. Jolowsky C. · 2017
25. 10.1002/smll.20090195710.1002/smll.200901957 ↗
26. Zhang S. · 2019 · 33510.1016/B978-0-12-812667-7.00014-8 ↗
27. A.McDowellandT.Hubing “Decomposition of Shielding Effectiveness Into Absorption and Reflection Components ”Clemson Vehicular Electronics Laboratory Report number: CVEL‐14‐058.1 2016.
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.10924010.1016/j.compositesa.2025.109240 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.014 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.05610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.056 ↗
31. 10.1063/5.007501910.1063/5.0075019 ↗