Investigation of the Influence of Impactor Geometry on the Low‐Velocity Impact Behavior of Hybrid Composite Pipes
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study investigates the low‐velocity impact behavior of filament‐wound composite pipes reinforced with carbon and basalt fibers. Four types of six‐layer pipes were fabricated: a carbon fiber/epoxy composite (CCC), a basalt fiber/epoxy composite (BBB), and two hybrid carbon‐basalt composites (CBC and BCB). All specimens were subjected to 20 J drop‐weight impact tests using three different impactor geometries (hemispherical, conical, and pyramidal). Force–time and force–displacement responses were recorded, and post‐impact damage was examined via cross‐sectional microscopy. The results show that fiber type and impactor shape significantly affect impact performance. The BBB exhibited the highest peak force and minimal internal damage due to its higher ductility, whereas the CCC showed lower peak force and extensive damage due to its brittleness. Hybrid composites showed intermediate behavior: the BCB achieved higher peak forces than the CBC, which was more prone to brittle failure. Hemispherical impactors produced higher peak forces and smaller deflections, whereas sharp impactors (conical and pyramidal) caused lower peak forces, deeper penetration, and more severe damage. These findings demonstrate that incorporating basalt fibers improves the impact resistance of composite pipes and that impactor geometry plays a crucial role in damage development. These insights can inform the design of impact‐tolerant composite structures for aerospace, automotive, and pressure vessel applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Science Mersin University Mersin Turkey
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Faculty Mersin University Mersin Turkey
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Investigation of Composite Materials That Can Be Used Instead of Superalloys in Aircraft Engines
2. Effect of Laminate Thickness and Impact Mode on the Low‐Velocity Impact Response of Jute‐Epoxy Composite: FE Study
3. Mechanical and Low Velocity Impact Characterization of Carbon/Glass Hybrid Composites With Graphene Nanoplatelets10.1088/2053-1591/ab1c03 ↗
4. Experimental Analysis of the Effect of Impact Geometry on Carbon‐Reinforced Composite Materials10.1177/096739111702500905 ↗
5. Effects of Impact Geometry on the Low‐Velocity Impact Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Composites: An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation10.1007/s10443-020-09812-8 ↗
6. Damage Behavior of Functionally Graded Kevlar/Carbon Epoxy Nanocomposites Reinforced With Polyamide 6.6 Nanofiber and MWCNTs Subjected to Low‐Velocity Impact10.1177/10567895241305324 ↗
7. Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Fabric Wrapping Method and Autoclave Curing on the Mechanical and Thermal Degradation of Carbon Nanotube Doped and Undoped Carbon Composite Pipes10.1002/pc.28675 ↗
8. Effect of Impact Modes on Low‐Velocity Impact Properties of Al Sheet10.1080/17445302.2018.1473025 ↗
9. O.Keküç “Investigation of Low‐Velocity Impact Response of Carbon Fiber‐Reinforced Filament‐Wound Composite Tubes (Master's Thesis Necmettin Erbakan University (Turkey))”(2022).
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11442810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114428 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.est.2021.10346810.1016/j.est.2021.103468 ↗
12. 10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.8.274110.5762/KAIS.2010.11.8.2741 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.06.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.06.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.10173010.1016/j.rineng.2023.101730 ↗
15. M.Kara “Damage Behavior of Filament‐Wound GRP Pipes Repaired With a Patch After Low‐Velocity Impact Under Internal Pressure (Thesis No. 315857) ”2012[Doctoral Dissertation Selcuk University]. National Thesis Center.
16. Low Velocity Transverse Impact of Filament‐Wound Pipes: Part 1. Damage due to Static and Impact Loads10.1016/0263-8223(92)90010-A ↗
17. Investigation of the Effect of Stacking Sequence on Low Velocity Impact Response and Damage Formation in Hybrid Composite Pipes Under Internal Pressure. A Comparative Study10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.056 ↗
18. Theoretical and Numerical Analyses of Composite Cylinders Subjected to the Low Velocity Impact10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111230 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11452010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114520 ↗
20. Experimental Investigation of Fatigue Damage Formation of Hybrid Pipes Subjected to Impact Loading Under Internal Pre‐Stress10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.051 ↗
21. Effects of Stacking Thickness on the Damage Behavior in CFRP Composite Cylinders Subjected to Out‐Of‐Plane Loading10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.004 ↗
22. 10.3390/polym1811129010.3390/polym18111290 ↗
23. Low‐Velocity Impact Damage in Glass Fibre/Epoxy Cylindrical Tubes10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00030-7 ↗
24. Effects of Stacking Sequence on the Impact Resistance in Composite Laminates—Part 1: Parametric Study10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00036-1 ↗
25. Ballistic Impact Behaviour of Stitched Graphite/Epoxy Laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.015 ↗
26. Impact of Sea and Tap Water Exposure on the Durability of GFRP Laminates10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.044 ↗
27. Low‐Velocity Impact on Carbon/Epoxy Tubes Subjected to Torque‐Experimental Results, Analytical Models and FEM Analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.035 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11313110.1016/j.compositesb.2025.113131 ↗
29. An Experimental Investigation on the Impact Response of Composite Materials10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.11.009 ↗
30. Seawater Effect on Impact Behavior of Glass‐Epoxy Composite Pipes10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.006 ↗
31. Mechanical Performance of Hybrid Woven Jute‐Roselle‐Reinforced Polyester Composites10.1177/0967391119847552 ↗
32. Low Velocity Impact Response of Prestressed Functionally Graded Hybrid Pipes10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.025 ↗
33. Effects of Hybridization and Fiber Orientation on Flexural Properties of Hybrid Short Glass Fiber‐and Short Carbon Fiber‐Reinforced Vinyl Ester Composites10.1177/0967391118801608 ↗
34. Comparison Between Elastic Properties of Theoretical, Computational Method and Experimental Results for Filament Wound Composite Pipes10.1007/s40430-016-0584-9 ↗
35. Investigation of the Stress‐Strain Constitutive Behavior of ±55° Filament‐Wound GFRP Pipes in Compression and Tension10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.077 ↗
36. Pressure Response and Life Assessment of Filament‐Wound Composite Pipes After Impact10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.06.002 ↗
37. Crashworthiness of Pre‐Impacted Glass/Epoxy Composite Tubes10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.007 ↗
38. Effects of the Number of Fatigue Cycles on the Impact Behavior of Glass Fiber/Epoxy Composite Tubes10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.021 ↗
39. A Comprehensive Investigation Into the Influence of Variation in the Stacking Sequence on the Mechanical Behaviour and Drilling Machinability of Basalt Fiber‐Reinforced Composite Tubes10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112405 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.06.05410.1016/j.jmapro.2021.06.054 ↗
41. Environmental Effect on Fatigue Life of Glass‐Epoxy Composite Pipes Subjected to Impact Loading10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.001 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.03910.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.039 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.003 ↗
44. Biochar as an Effective Filler of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Bio‐Epoxy Composites
45. Y.Kepir “The Effect of Hydrothermal Aging on the Mechanical Properties of Hybrid COMPOSITE Materials (Thesis No. 719287) ”2021[Master's Thesis Mersin University]. National Thesis Center.
46. A.Günöz “Investigation of Mechanical Properties and Damage Behaviors of Functionally Graded Kevlar‐Carbon/Epoxy Nanocomposites Reinforced with Polyamide Nanofibers (Thesis No. 766858) ”2022[Doctoral dissertation Mersin University]. National Thesis Center.
47. 10.18038/btda.6834210.18038/btda.68342 ↗
48. M.Uyaner “Test to Graph (Version 3) [Data set]. Mendeley Data”(2026).