journal article·2026-06-27

Process‐Induced Anisotropy and Fracture Behavior of Pellet‐ 3D Printed PLA and PLA /Flax Biocomposites

Fernando Ancio, Luis Távara, Luis Miguel Ferreira

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fused granular fabrication (FGF) enables cost‐effective, large‐scale polymer additive manufacturing; however, the mechanical behavior and fracture response of pellet extruded parts, particularly for natural‐fiber composites, remain insufficiently characterized. This study evaluates the tensile response and fracture mechanisms of neat polylactic acid (PLA) and flax fiber‐reinforced PLA (PLA/Flax) produced by FGF. Two hundred specimens are tested to quantify the influence of raster orientation and layer height on process‐induced anisotropy. Tensile strength, elastic modulus, and density are measured, utilizing density‐normalized metrics to reduce scatter, while fracture surfaces are analyzed by 3D optical profilometry. FGF‐processed PLA reaches tensile strengths up to 59.5 MPa for a 0° raster orientation, whereas PLA/Flax achieves up to 45.82 MPa. Both materials present reduced elastic stiffness, with moduli approximately 40%–50% lower than common reference values. Reducing the layer height generally improves the mechanical performance and reduces the orientation sensitivity but increases the printing time and production cost. Profilometry confirms that anisotropy is governed by bead orientation and bonding quality. A reduction of approximately 46% in the average fracture surface roughness of representative PLA/Flax composite specimens was observed as layer height decreased, correlating with an increase in density‐normalized tensile strength. These results provide practical guidance for selecting raster strategies to balance mechanical performance with manufacturing efficiency in pellet‐based printing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Mecánica de Medios Continuos y Teoría de Estructuras. Escuela Politécnica Superior Universidad de Sevilla Sevilla Spain

Departamento de Mecánica de Medios Continuos y Teoría de Estructuras. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Universidad de Sevilla, Camino de los descubrimientos, s/n Sevilla Spain

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.03810.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 ↗
3. 10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
4. 10.22055/jacm.2026.48834.553310.22055/jacm.2026.48834.5533 ↗
5. 10.1108/RPJ‐12‐2015‐018310.1108/RPJ‐12‐2015‐0183 ↗
6. 10.1557/jmr.2014.21210.1557/jmr.2014.212 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.01.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.009 ↗
9. 10.1002/app.5308910.1002/app.53089 ↗
10. 10.1089/3dp.2019.01910.1089/3dp.2019.019 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10374410.1016/j.addma.2023.103744 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
13. 10.3390/jcs701002710.3390/jcs7010027 ↗
14. 10.3390/ma1419588310.3390/ma14195883 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1405088610.3390/polym14050886 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.013 ↗
17. “Smart Materials PLA ” accessed January 20 2026 https://filament2print.com/en/pla/688‐6489‐pla‐pellets.html#/834‐format‐1_kg.
18. “Nanovia PLA Flax Technical Data Sheet ” accessed January 20 2026 https://nanovia.tech/en/ref/nanovia‐pla‐flax/.
19. Dassault Systèmes “SOLIDWORKS Software Version 2025 Computer Software Released November 15 2024”(2024) https://www.solidworks.com.
20. International Organization for Standardization “ISO 527‐4:2023 Plastics ‐ Determination of Tensile properties ISO Geneva CH 2023 ” accessed March 30 2025 https://www.iso.org/standard/85809.html.
21. Simplify3D “Simplify3D Software Version 5.1.2 Computer Software Released August 11 2023”(2023) https://www.simplify3d.com.
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11719610.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117196 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11103110.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111031 ↗
24. International Organization for Standardization “Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Areal—Part 600: Metrological Characteristics for Areal Topography Measuring Methods ISO 25178‐600:2019 ” accessed 2026‐02‐04(2019).
25. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.02310.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.023 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.06510.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10648310.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106483 ↗
28. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1044‐1045.3110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1044‐1045.31 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.06.21210.1016/j.matpr.2023.06.212 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.coco.2022.10116310.1016/j.coco.2022.101163 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10081110.1016/j.addma.2019.100811 ↗
32. K.Chansoda C.Suvanjumrat andW.Chookaew “Comparative Study on the Wood‐Based PLA Fabricated by Compression Molding and Additive Manufacturing in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 1137 IOP Publishing ” 2021 012032 https://doi.org/10.1088/1757‐899X/1137/1/012032.10.1088/1757-899X/1137/1/012032 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.7109310.1002/pc.71093 ↗
34. 10.3390/polym1422494110.3390/polym14224941 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10891110.1016/j.matdes.2020.108911 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
37. 10.3390/polym1315244310.3390/polym13152443 ↗
38. 10.1089/3dp.2016.005410.1089/3dp.2016.0054 ↗
39. 10.3390/polym1624356910.3390/polym16243569 ↗
40. 10.1007/s00170‐020‐06138‐410.1007/s00170‐020‐06138‐4 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.mtla.2025.10254110.1016/j.mtla.2025.102541 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.05110.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051 ↗