journal article·2026-06-11Open access

Vacuum Infusion as a Processing Route for Transparent Wood Laminates

Letícia Zimermann Pires, Ohayna Lisboa Santos, Wagner Müller Ferreira, Darci Alberto Gatto, Sandro Campos Amico, Mayara Elita Braz Carneiro, Pedro Henrique Gonzalez de Cademartori, Andrey Pereira Acosta

Abstract

ABSTRACT Transparent wood (TW) has attracted increasing attention as a bio‐based material for daylighting and building‐envelope applications due to its optical functionality, low thermal conductivity, and favorable strength‐to‐weight ratio. However, its practical implementation remains limited by challenges associated with polymer impregnation, interfacial cohesion, and thickness‐dependent performance degradation. In this study, the vacuum infusion process (VIP), a well‐established manufacturing technique in composite engineering, is systematically evaluated as a processing route for the fabrication of TW laminates from Pinus elliottii veneers and epoxy resin. Partial delignification achieved an ~88% reduction in lignin content, promoting effective resin infiltration into the wood cellular structure. Optical characterization revealed high transmittance in thin laminates, reaching up to 97% at 700 nm for single‐layer transparent wood (TW‐1). With increasing laminate thickness, transmittance decreased by ~22%, ~25%, and ~65% for TW‐2, TW‐3, and TW‐5, respectively, primarily due to increased optical path length and cumulative interfacial scattering. Thermal analysis indicated that epoxy impregnation partially compensated for the reduced thermal stability of delignified wood. Dynamic mechanical analysis demonstrated effective stress transfer and strong interfacial synergy in thin and intermediate laminates, while tensile testing showed that TW‐1 exhibited a 25% increase in strength compared to natural wood and a 258% increase relative to neat epoxy. Overall, the results demonstrate that vacuum infusion is a viable and scalable processing route for the fabrication of TW laminates for non‐structural building components, while also revealing critical thickness‐dependent limitations that must be addressed to enable reliable application in daylighting and architectural systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Lignin and Wood Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Federal University of Paraná Curitiba Brazil

Industrial Wood Engineering Federal University of Paraná Curitiba Brazil

Federal University of Pelotas Pelotas Brazil

Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10570‐023‐05239‐z10.1007/s10570‐023‐05239‐z ↗
2. United Nations “The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development ”2015 https://Sdgs.Un.Org/2030agenda.
3. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11707710.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117077 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carpta.2024.10048710.1016/j.carpta.2024.100487 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.11907610.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119076 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.16106710.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161067 ↗
7. 10.1002/admt.20220070410.1002/admt.202200704 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.3c1170610.1021/acsami.3c11706 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11720710.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117207 ↗
10. 10.1098/rsta.2017.018210.1098/rsta.2017.0182 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11623410.1016/j.indcrop.2022.116234 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0014510.1021/acs.biomac.6b00145 ↗
13. 10.3390/molecules3007150610.3390/molecules30071506 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10853‐021‐05833‐110.1007/s10853‐021‐05833‐1 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10787110.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107871 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199831348599810.1177/0021998313485998 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10561910.1016/j.jobe.2022.105619 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.11210.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.112 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13447010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.134470 ↗
20. 10.3390/f1502038410.3390/f15020384 ↗
21. 10.1002/app.5187210.1002/app.51872 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.10960010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109600 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.02010.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.020 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0484210.1021/acsomega.2c04842 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.01310.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.12210.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.122 ↗
27. Rowell R. M. · 2012 · 75
28. 10.1007/s10973‐011‐1902‐110.1007/s10973‐011‐1902‐1 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10853‐017‐1193‐410.1007/s10853‐017‐1193‐4 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10770110.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107701 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.004 ↗