Investigation of the Flatwise Compressive Behavior of Hollow Glass Microsphere‐Filled Nomex Honeycomb CFRP Sandwich Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The rapid development of deep‐sea exploration has increased the demand for lightweight materials with high load‐bearing capacity and energy absorption under compressive loading. In this study, the mechanical response of conventional carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer (CFRP)–Nomex honeycomb sandwich structures was enhanced by filling the honeycomb core with hollow glass microspheres (HGM). Three configurations were investigated: an HGM syntactic foam with CFRP skins (HC), a Nomex honeycomb core with CFRP skins (NC), and an HGM‐filled Nomex honeycomb core with CFRP skins (NHC). Flatwise compression experiments and finite element analysis were conducted to quantify compressive strength and energy absorption, and artificial seawater immersion tests (6‐day exposure) were performed to evaluate the retention of stiffness and peak compressive load. The results show that NHC exhibits the highest compressive strength, achieving a 308% increase in compressive strength compared with NC. NHC also demonstrates superior energy absorption (109 J) relative to HC (44.7 J) and NC (5.52 J), corresponding to an approximately 19‐fold increase in specific energy absorption. Following the artificial seawater immersion, NHC retains stiffness and compressive performance more effectively than NC. These findings indicate that HGM‐filled Nomex honeycomb CFRP sandwich structures represent a promising approach for lightweight, energy‐absorbing core design with potential applicability in deep‐sea engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials Science and Engineering Ocean University of China Qingdao People's Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong Province
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent Trends in Polymer Matrix Solid Buoyancy Materials: A Review10.3390/polym16162307 ↗
2. Effect of Curing Agents and Hollow Glass Microspheres on the Compression Properties of Syntactic Foams10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.002 ↗
3. Processing of Low‐Density HGM‐Filled Epoxy–Syntactic Foam Composites With High Specific Properties for Marine Applications10.3390/ma16041732 ↗
4. Mechanical Behaviour of Multifunctional Epoxy/Hollow Glass Microspheres/Paraffin Microcapsules Syntactic Foams for Thermal Management10.3390/polym13172896 ↗
5. Preparation and Physical Properties of Hollow Glass Microspheres‐Reinforced Epoxy Matrix Resins10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.015 ↗
6. Epoxy Resin/Hollow Glass Microspheres Composite Materials With Low Dielectric Constant and Excellent Mechanical Performance10.1002/app.52787 ↗
7. Fabrication of Heat‐Resistant Syntactic Foams Through Binding Hollow Glass Microspheres With Phosphate Adhesive10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.108 ↗
8. Thermal Expansion Behavior of Hollow Glass Particle–Vinyl Ester Composites10.1007/s10853-012-6452-9 ↗
9. High Strain Rate Compressive Response of Syntactic Foams: Trends in Mechanical Properties and Failure Mechanisms10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.073 ↗
10. Characterization of Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Epoxy–Glass Microballoon Syntactic Composites10.1080/00150190601018002 ↗
11. Thermal Conductivity of Multiphase Particulate Composite Materials10.1007/s10853-008-3040-0 ↗
12. Fabrication and Environmental Applications of Glass Microspheres: A Review10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.10.040 ↗
13. Amos S. E. · 2016
14. Glassy Microspheres for Energy Applications10.3390/mi9080379 ↗
15. Potential of Hollow Glass Microsphere as Cement Replacement for Lightweight Foam Concrete on Thermal Insulation Performance10.1051/matecconf/201710301014 ↗
16. Epoxy/Hollow Glass Microsphere Syntactic Foams for Structural and Functional Application—A Review10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111163 ↗
17. Effects of Hollow Glass Microsphere Density and Surface Modification on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Syntactic Foams10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.088 ↗
18. Lightweight Sandwich Structures for Marine Applications: A Review10.1080/15376494.2021.1941448 ↗
19. Low‐Velocity Impact Response of Tube‐Reinforced Honeycomb Sandwich Structure10.1016/j.tws.2020.107188 ↗
20. Core Composites “Nomex Honeycomb: Lightweight Non‐Metallic Composite Honeycomb ” 2024 https://www.corecomposites.com/honeycomb‐core.
21. M. J. L.Van Tooren “Sandwich Fuselage Design”(PhD diss. Delft University of Technology 1998) 313.
22. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Entrapped Air on the Mechanical Response of Nomex Honeycomb Under Flatwise Compression10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.080 ↗
23. Failure Study of Honeycomb Sandwich Structure With Embedded Part Under Axial Pullout Loading10.1016/j.tws.2019.106489 ↗
24. Strain Rate Effects in Phenolic Composites and Phenolic‐Impregnated Honeycomb Structures10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.027 ↗
25. Experimental and Numerical Study on the Mechanical Response of Nomex Honeycomb Core Under Transverse Loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.034 ↗
26. A Review of Low‐Velocity Impact on Sandwich Structures10.1177/1464420711409985 ↗
27. Uday V. · 2011
28. The Impact Resistance of Composite Materials—A Review10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
29. Localized Impact on Sandwich Structures With Laminated Facings10.1115/1.3101689 ↗
30. The Impact Response of a Nomex Honeycomb Core/E‐Glass/Epoxy Composite Sandwich Structure to Increasing Velocities: Experimental and Numerical Analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117205 ↗
31. The Flatwise Compressive Properties of Nomex Honeycomb Core With Debonding Imperfections in the Double Cell Wall10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.017 ↗
32. Quasi‐Static Axial Compression Behavior of Constraint Hexagonal and Square‐Packed Empty and Aluminum Foam‐Filled Aluminum Multi‐Tubes10.1016/j.tws.2006.07.003 ↗
33. Experimental Study on Crashworthiness of Empty/Aluminum Foam/Honeycomb‐Filled CFRP Tubes10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.019 ↗
34. Crushing Characteristics of Fiber Reinforced Conical Tubes With Foam‐Filler10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.04.023 ↗
35. Crushing Response of Square Aluminium Column Filled With Carbon Fibre Tubes and Aluminium Honeycomb10.1016/j.tws.2018.07.037 ↗
36. Numerical and Theoretical Analysis of Honeycomb Structure Filled With Circular Aluminum Tubes Subjected to Axial Compression10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.070 ↗
37. Mechanical Properties of Rigid and Flexible Polyurethane Foam In Situ Foamed Nomex Honeycomb10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117365 ↗
38. Crushing Response of Square Aluminium Tubes Filled With Polyurethane Foam and Aluminium Honeycomb10.1016/j.tws.2016.10.023 ↗
39. Investigation of the Impact Resistance of Foam‐Filled Combined Honeycomb Structures10.1002/pen.70017 ↗
40. Foam‐Filled Aramid Honeycomb Sandwich Composites With High Acoustic Insulation Properties Prepared Using a Unique Thermal Expansion Molding Process10.1016/j.coco.2024.101866 ↗
41. Study on Mechanical and Acoustic Properties of Modified‐PUF Reinforced CFRP/Plastic Honeycomb Sandwich Structure10.1002/pat.70387 ↗
42. Characterization of Nomex Honeycomb Core Constituent Material Mechanical Properties10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.033 ↗
43. Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of the Sandwich Composite Structure Reinforced by Basalt Fiber and Nomex Honeycomb10.3390/ma13081870 ↗
44. Energy Absorption of 3D Printed ABS and TPU Multimaterial Honeycomb Structures
45. Study on the Energy Absorption Characteristics of Different Composite Honeycomb Sandwich Structures Under Impact Energy10.3390/app14072832 ↗
46. Energy Absorption Properties of Origami‐Based Re‐Entrant Honeycomb Sandwich Structures With CFRP CFRP Subjected to Low‐Velocity Impact10.1002/pc.29078 ↗
47. Compression Behavior and Energy Absorption Capacity of Stiffened Syntactic Foam Core Sandwich Composites10.1177/0731684413492867 ↗
48. Characterization and Modeling of Compression Behavior of Syntactic Foam‐Filled Honeycombs10.1177/0731684410369023 ↗