journal article·2026-06-05

Compressive Behavior of GFRP Gradient‐Angle Filament Wound Pultruded Circular Columns

Laiyun Yang, Jiehao Duan, Hai Fang, Yongsheng Song, Honglei Xie, Chen Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT A novel glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) gradient‐angle filament wound pultruded circular column (GAWP) was proposed in this study. Specimens with two parameters including the thickness of the filament‐wound face sheets and the number of sequential angular steps were tested to investigate the compressive behavior and failure modes of GAWP. The results revealed that all the composite specimens failed due to the compressive damage of pultruded tubes followed by the crush of winding filaments, showing an obvious progressive failure process. Pultruded tubes exhibited great axial stiffness, and the application of filament‐wound reinforcements resulted in sufficient utilization of the material's strength. Great pseudo‐ductility was also found in gradient‐angle filament wound structures, with further improvement achieved through increased sequential angular steps. Increasing the thickness of the winding face sheets delayed the initial damage but reduced the ductile coefficient. By introducing three‐dimensional elasticity theory, an analytical model was proposed for evaluating the stress–strain relationship of the specimens, and the results were consistent with the test data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Architectural Engineering Jinling Institute of Technology Nanjing China

College of Civil Engineering Nanjing Tech University Nanjing China

Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture Anhui University of Technology Maanshan China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10830010.1016/j.tws.2021.108300 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2677410.1002/pc.26774 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2984510.1002/pc.29845 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2846510.1002/pc.28465 ↗
5. Experimental Investigation of Composite Circular Encased GFRP I‐Section Concrete Columns under Different Load Conditions10.48084/etasr.8521 ↗
6. Structural Performance of a Hollow‐Core Square Concrete Column Longitudinally Reinforced with GFRP Bars under Concentric Load10.3390/civileng5040047 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.01810.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.018 ↗
8. Sirimanna C. S. · 2011
9. 10.1002/pc.3008210.1002/pc.30082 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.09010.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.090 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.06310.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.063 ↗
12. A critical review on buckling and post‐buckling analysis of composite structures, Front
13. 10.1002/pc.7022410.1002/pc.70224 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11280610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112806 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2793310.1002/pc.27933 ↗
16. A new parameter to describe crippling strength: Experimental and theoretical investigations for post‐ buckling behaviors of the composite structures10.1002/pc.27875 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10944810.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109448 ↗
18. Li F. · 2021
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11365010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113650 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11455310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114553 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.07110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.071 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11044510.1016/j.tws.2022.110445 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.04810.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.048 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2693310.1002/pc.26933 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2627410.1002/pc.26274 ↗
26. Khennane A. · 2013 · 18710.1533/9780857098641.2.187 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10725510.1016/j.tws.2020.107255 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.02110.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.021 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10682910.1016/j.istruc.2024.106829 ↗
30. Behaviors of New Generation of FRP Bridge Deck with Outside Filament‐Wound Reinforcement
31. 10.1002/pc.2667810.1002/pc.26678 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.05610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.056 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.03910.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.039 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11062410.1016/j.matdes.2022.110624 ↗
35. Axial Compression Failure Analysis of Seawater Sea‐Sand Recycled Aggregate Concrete Filled Pultruded GFRP Tubular Column10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.110143 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.est.2021.10346810.1016/j.est.2021.103468 ↗
37. 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2019.S1.02510.14006/j.jzjgxb.2019.S1.025 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.15710.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.157 ↗
39. 10.3390/app12201030610.3390/app122010306 ↗
40. ASTM D3171‐15 “Standard Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite Materials PA USA ASTM ”2015.
41. ASTM D3410‐16 “Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials with Unsupported Gage Section by Shear Loading PA USA ASTM”2016.
42. ASTM D3518‐18 “Standard Test Method for In‐Plane Shear Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by Tensile Test of a ±45° Laminate PA USA ASTM”2018.
43. 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.01.03710.1016/j.jobe.2019.01.037 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.00910.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.009 ↗
45. ASTM D2290‐19 Standard Test Method for Apparent Hoop Tensile Strength of Plastic or Reinforced Plastic Pipe(2016).
46. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000052310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0000523 ↗
47. Gök, Investigation of Mechanical Properties and Damage Development of Filament Wound GFRP Composite Pipes by Ring Tensile Test, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilim
48. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11492910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114929 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.009 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10941510.1016/j.tws.2022.109415 ↗
51. 10.6052/j.issn.1000‐4750.2016.03.019210.6052/j.issn.1000‐4750.2016.03.0192 ↗
52. Wang J. · 2018
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12512910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125129 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.022 ↗
55. Inconsistencies and False Assumptions Related to the Determination of Design Values for FRP Systems, in: Proc