A Novel 3D Model for Describing Interlayer Intimate Contact During the Processing of Thermoplastic Composite
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study presents a novel 3D interlayer contact model based on fractal theory to quantify the evolution of intimate contact during thermoplastic prepreg processing. The rough surface is modeled as a 3D Cantor set embedded in a 2D plane, and the 3D deformation of asperities under processing conditions is described using a creeping squeeze flow model in polar coordinates. Key parameters, including fractal dimension, scaling factor, and a dimensionless surface roughness ratio, are calibrated and used to predict interlayer contact in three‐layer prepregs under various thermoforming conditions. Experimental validation using metallographic and C‐scan analysis confirms the model's accuracy, with most prediction errors within 5%. Compared to conventional 2D models, the 3D model provides improved accuracy by accounting for the 3D flow of asperities, particularly under higher temperature and pressure. Finally, the independent impact mechanisms of the processing parameters and surface geometry on intimate contact are analyzed, with temperature and fractal dimension exerting the greatest impact on the rate of contact development. This model serves as an effective tool for predicting intimate contact evolution in thermoplastic composite processing and provides theoretical support for interlaminar strength prediction and manufacturing process optimization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Composite Material Mechanics · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Lab of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou China
Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of Zhejiang Province, School of Mechanical Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou China
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China
Composite Center, Shanghai Aircraft Manufacturing co., Ltd. Shanghai China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-030-35346-9_410.1007/978-3-030-35346-9_4 ↗
2. Arhant M. · 2015 · 1120
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11422310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114223 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10021510.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100215 ↗
5. Characterization and Analysis of Conduction Welded Thermoplastic Composite Joints Considering the Influence of Manufacturing10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118505 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10944810.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109448 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11328910.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113289 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.008 ↗
9. Dara P. H. · 1985
10. Loos A. C. · 1987 · 125710.1007/978-1-4613-1893-4_143 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.32852610.1063/1.328526 ↗
12. 10.1021/ma00241a01310.1021/ma00241a013 ↗
13. 10.1177/00219983870210110310.1177/002199838702101103 ↗
14. 10.1177/00219983920260160210.1177/002199839202601602 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10809510.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108095 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10814510.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108145 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10588810.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105888 ↗
18. 10.1177/002199831347631810.1177/0021998313476318 ↗
19. 10.1177/073168441668704110.1177/0731684416687041 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2022.10029010.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100290 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10851910.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108519 ↗
22. How Long Is the Coast of Britain?
23. 10.1017/S002211207500304710.1017/S0022112075003047 ↗
24. 10.1073/pnas.72.10.382510.1073/pnas.72.10.3825 ↗
25. Berry M. V. · 1980 · 459
26. 10.1115/1.292058810.1115/1.2920588 ↗
27. 10.1115/1.278720810.1115/1.2787208 ↗
28. 10.1023/A:101795021594510.1023/A:1017950215945 ↗
29. Fractal Description of Interlaminar Contact Development During Thermoplastic Composites Processing10.1177/073168401772678580 ↗
30. Ausloos M. · 1985 · 331
31. Contact Analysis of Elastic‐Plastic Fractal Surfaces10.1063/1.368536 ↗
32. Random Cantor Set Models for the Elastic‐Perfectly Plastic Contact of Rough Surfaces10.1016/0043-1648(95)06785-X ↗
33. Brenner H. · 2013
34. 10.1016/0890-6955(94)P2375-P10.1016/0890-6955(94)P2375-P ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10854010.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108540 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2025.11127710.1016/j.compscitech.2025.111277 ↗
37. On Correlation Between Fractal Dimension and Profilometric Parameters in Characterization of Surface Topographies10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.11.028 ↗
38. Experimental Study on the Characterization of Worn Surface Topography With Characteristic Roughness Parameter10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00215-1 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jterra.2010.05.00410.1016/j.jterra.2010.05.004 ↗
40. Relationship Between the Fractal Dimension and Joint Roughness Coefficient10.2113/gseegeosci.xxvi.2.253 ↗