journal article·2026-05-08Open access

PLA /Kahili Ginger Fiber Biocomposites Processed by Fused Filament Fabrication: Physical and Mechanical Characterization

Bruno Lourenço, Rita Serôdio, Ana Clara Marques, Raquel Galante, Ricardo Claudio, Célio G. Figueiredo‐Pina

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores the potential of Kahili ginger (KG) fibers as reinforcement/filler in poly(lactic acid) (PLA) matrix composites for 3D printing applications. The fibers underwent alkaline and silane treatments to increase the mechanical resistance of fiber and improve the bond with the PLA matrix. Filaments for 3D printing were obtained by extrusion and the density and water absorption were assessed. 3D printed samples were produced by fused deposition modeling and density, water absorption, and mechanical properties were evaluated. The results showed that tensile strength increased at 10 wt% fiber concentration compared to the 5 wt% fiber concentrations. Compressive tests indicated an ultimate compressive strength greater than that of PLA, demonstrating the composites' superior load capacity. Flexural tests further validated these findings, particularly for alkaline‐treated composites, which exhibited enhanced rigidity. Morphological analysis via scanning electron microscopy revealed improved surface characteristics of treated fibers, correlating with mechanical performance. Additionally, water absorption tests showed that the composites with treated fibers absorbed significantly less moisture than untreated fibers, highlighting the efficacy of the chemical treatments. These results suggest that KG fiber‐reinforced PLA composites offer a sustainable alternative for 3D printing, aligning with the increasing demand for eco‐friendly materials in manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Escola Superior de Tecnologia de Setúbal Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal Setúbal Portugal

CeFEMA, Instituto Superior Técnico ‐ Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa Portugal

CERENA, DEQ, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa Portugal

CQE, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal

Instituto de Engenharia Mecânica (IDMEC), Instituto Superior Técnico—Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa Portugal

Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health & Science, Quinta da Granja, Monte da Caparica Caparica Portugal

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. Biocomposites Market “Industry Report ”2026 accessed March 20 2026 https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry‐analysis/biocomposites‐market.
2. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2018.10.12910.1016/J.MATPR.2018.10.129 ↗
3. Dunne R. · 201610.1177/0731684416633898 ↗
4. Thomas S. · 2011 · 310.1007/978-3-642-17370-7_1 ↗
5. 10.3390/jcs612037310.3390/jcs6120373 ↗
6. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2014.11.04310.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2014.11.043 ↗
7. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2017.11.27610.1016/J.MATPR.2017.11.276 ↗
8. 10.1016/J.PROGPOLYMSCI.2012.04.00310.1016/J.PROGPOLYMSCI.2012.04.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.12748310.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.127483 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1210237310.3390/polym12102373 ↗
11. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2009.04.00310.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2009.04.003 ↗
12. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.10.52310.1016/J.MATPR.2020.10.523 ↗
13. Le Bourhis E. · 2021 · 13510.1016/B978-0-12-819724-0.00009-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.02.98210.1016/J.MATPR.2020.02.982 ↗
15. Sahu P. · 2020
16. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2012.04.05310.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2012.04.053 ↗
17. 10.2478/ftee‐2022‐001110.2478/ftee‐2022‐0011 ↗
18. Shah I. · 2022 · 5133
19. 10.1016/J.JMRT.2019.04.01210.1016/J.JMRT.2019.04.012 ↗
20. 10.1177/073168441880202210.1177/0731684418802022 ↗
21. Siakeng R. · 201910.1002/pc.24747 ↗
22. 10.3390/jcs507017510.3390/jcs5070175 ↗
23. Jagadeesh P. · 202110.1002/pc.26312 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10924‐006‐0042‐310.1007/s10924‐006‐0042‐3 ↗
25. Aida H. J. · 2021
26. 10.3390/polym1309140710.3390/polym13091407 ↗
27. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.02.39710.1016/J.MATPR.2021.02.397 ↗
28. 10.3390/polym1314228910.3390/polym13142289 ↗
29. 10.3390/ma1318406510.3390/ma13184065 ↗
30. 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.12410910.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.124109 ↗
31. 10.3390/su15231617110.3390/su152316171 ↗
32. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.02.81210.1016/J.MATPR.2021.02.812 ↗
34. 10.3390/jcs301002710.3390/jcs3010027 ↗
35. 10.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2023.10808310.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2023.108083 ↗
36. Gholampour A. · 2020 · 829
37. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(03)00097‐610.1016/S0266‐3538(03)00097‐6 ↗
38. 10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2006.07.00910.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2006.07.009 ↗
39. 10.1016/J.JMRT.2021.06.01410.1016/J.JMRT.2021.06.014 ↗
40. 10.1300/J395v01n03_0310.1300/J395v01n03_03 ↗
41. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2020.10618310.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2020.106183 ↗
42. 10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2009.01.01610.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2009.01.016 ↗
43. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.02.45710.1016/J.MATPR.2020.02.457 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10791210.1016/j.rineng.2025.107912 ↗
45. 10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.09.15910.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.09.159 ↗
46. 10.1080/15440478.2019.171065110.1080/15440478.2019.1710651 ↗
47. 10.1088/2053‐1591/ab22d910.1088/2053‐1591/ab22d9 ↗
48. 10.1002/app.4715410.1002/app.47154 ↗
49. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2022.05.31910.1016/J.MATPR.2022.05.319 ↗
50. 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2007.12.07310.1016/J.BIORTECH.2007.12.073 ↗
51. 10.1080/15440478.2018.146945210.1080/15440478.2018.1469452 ↗
52. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2014.04.00310.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2014.04.003 ↗
53. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.12.11710.1016/J.MATPR.2020.12.117 ↗
54. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2017.09.03010.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2017.09.030 ↗
55. 10.3390/jcs101000810.3390/jcs1010008 ↗
56. 10.1051/mfreview/201602010.1051/mfreview/2016020 ↗
57. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2005.10.01410.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2005.10.014 ↗
58. 10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2017.12.01610.1016/J.MTCOMM.2017.12.016 ↗
59. 10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2019.10788710.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2019.107887 ↗
60. 10.1080/15440478.2022.216218310.1080/15440478.2022.2162183 ↗
61. 2014
62. Effect of Alkali Treatment on Water Absorption of Single Cellulosic Abaca Fiber10.15376/biores.7.3.3515-3524 ↗
63. Effects of Chemical Treatments on Mechanical and Physical Properties of Flax Fiber‐Reinforced Composites10.1515/SECM.2008.15.1.43 ↗
64. Comparison of Effects of Alkali Treatment on Flax Fibre Reinforced Polyester and Polyester‐Biopolymer Blend Resins10.1177/096739111502300404 ↗
65. 10.1080/14658011.2017.129855010.1080/14658011.2017.1298550 ↗
66. 10.1039/d1ra03023j10.1039/d1ra03023j ↗
67. 10.1007/s10570‐018‐2181‐910.1007/s10570‐018‐2181‐9 ↗
68. 10.1007/s10853‐008‐2762‐310.1007/s10853‐008‐2762‐3 ↗
69. 10.1177/0892705722109232710.1177/08927057221092327 ↗
70. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2016.03.08910.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2016.03.089 ↗