Enhancing Interfacial Toughness of CFRP /Honeycomb Sandwich Structures via Basalt Fiber and Graphene Oxide Hybrid Modification
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Interfacial toughening of sandwich structures was achieved by incorporating basalt fibers (BF). The optimal fiber content was first determined by evaluating five different compositions. Under three‐point bending, the specimen containing 2 wt% BF demonstrated the most notable improvement, with peak load and absorbed energy increasing by 27.4% and 102.5%, respectively. To further enhance performance, three toughened interfaces were engineered using this optimal fiber content. Among these, the BF‐GO hybrid treatment yielded superior results, achieving remarkable increases of 38.4% in peak load and 149% in energy absorption. This improvement is attributed to the synergistic effects of the APTES and GO treatments, which enhance the fiber's interfacial properties by improving wettability, increasing surface roughness, and introducing additional functional groups. These modifications promote mechanical interlocking and strengthen the fiber–resin interface. Consequently, this toughening strategy altered the structural failure mode, effectively suppressing interfacial debonding. Basalt fiber thus presents a cost‐effective approach for interfacial toughening in CFRP/honeycomb sandwich structures, mitigating debonding issues and enhancing overall performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials, Ministry of Education, and College of Materials Science and Engineering Jilin University Changchun China
Project Management Department Changchun Faway Automobile Components Co. Ltd. Changchun China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.025 ↗
2. 10.1088/1757-899X/971/3/03201110.1088/1757-899X/971/3/032011 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tws.2025.11368410.1016/j.tws.2025.113684 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2026.11546110.1016/j.matdes.2026.115461 ↗
5. 10.3390/jcs603008810.3390/jcs6030088 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10939310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109393 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10551810.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105518 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10721910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107219 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11139310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111393 ↗
10. 10.1177/1099636223120874510.1177/10996362231208745 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.10546010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105460 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.018 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10855410.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108554 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.021 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.010 ↗
16. 10.1080/15397734.2025.253274010.1080/15397734.2025.2532740 ↗
17. 10.1177/109963620706713410.1177/1099636207067134 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10915710.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109157 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10792410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107924 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.006 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10807210.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108072 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.18207310.1016/j.jallcom.2025.182073 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11642010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116420 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.003 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11082210.1016/j.tws.2023.110822 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11548610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115486 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11081710.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110817 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11102710.1016/j.compscitech.2024.111027 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.04210.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.042 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.11.00410.1016/j.corsci.2015.11.004 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12402810.1016/j.polymer.2021.124028 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10648810.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106488 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13687210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136872 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10849610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108496 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10688910.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106889 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10863910.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108639 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10864810.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108648 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10909610.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109096 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.coco.2022.10142710.1016/j.coco.2022.101427 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.012 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11730010.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117300 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.00410.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.004 ↗