journal article·2026-06-20Open access

The Role of Cold Atmospheric Plasma in Surface Modification and Adhesion Behavior of Polypropylene/Flax Biocomposites

Asil Ayaz, Kutlay Sever, Gizem Dilara Özdemir, Utku Kürşat Ercan

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT The emphasis on environmental sustainability has accelerated the adoption of biocomposites as alternatives to synthetic composites. However, their low surface energy may limit adhesion in bonding applications. This study investigates the effects of cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) treatment on the adhesion of flax fiber‐reinforced polypropylene (PP/flax) biocomposites. PP/flax plates were fabricated by sequential hot and cold pressing and subjected to CAP for different durations in atmospheric air. Surface modifications were characterized using contact angle measurements, atomic force microscopy (AFM), X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR‐FTIR). Adhesion performance was evaluated by single‐lap shear tests with a structural epoxy adhesive. CAP treatment significantly improved surface wettability, reducing water contact angle from 86° to 36°, while surface free energy reached a maximum after 150 s. Single‐lap shear strength increased from 0.54 MPa to 1.90 MPa at 150 s. Failure mode changed from adhesive failure in reference specimens to substrate failure in CAP‐treated joints. AFM indicated plasma etching increased nanoscale roughness, while XPS and ATR‐FTIR confirmed formation of polar functional groups and oxidation. Improvements beyond 150 s diminished, showing an optimal treatment range. These findings demonstrate that controlled CAP treatment effectively enhances the adhesive bonding of PP/flax.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering İzmir Katip Çelebi University İzmir Turkey

Department of Biomedical Engineering İzmir Katip Çelebi University İzmir Turkey

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10255710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102557 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.028 ↗
4. 10.1186/s40563-020-00131-610.1186/s40563-020-00131-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.11.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2009.11.017 ↗
6. 10.1163/15685540175325542210.1163/156855401753255422 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 ↗
8. 10.1201/b1218310.1201/b12183 ↗
9. 10.1680/jgrma.20.0005210.1680/jgrma.20.00052 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
11. Eternal N.
12. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990110)71:2<319::AID-APP16>3.0.CO;2-T10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990110)71:2<319::AID-APP16>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
13. Strobel M. · 1994
14. 10.1002/ppap.20230020810.1002/ppap.202300208 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1101013910.3390/polym11010139 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12638910.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126389 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.04210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.042 ↗
18. 10.3390/coatings1306103610.3390/coatings13061036 ↗
19. 10.1080/00218464.2024.232042110.1080/00218464.2024.2320421 ↗
20. 10.1177/152808371455705710.1177/1528083714557057 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2649710.1002/pc.26497 ↗
22. D.Sundeep E. K.Varadharaj andC. C.Sastry “Effect of Interfacial Bonding Characteristics on Electrical Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymeric Matrix Composite pp. 259–290 ”2024.10.1007/978-981-99-8327-8_12 ↗
23. 10.1088/2051-672X/ac578010.1088/2051-672X/ac5780 ↗
24. Accessed August 28 2025 https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/82790O/dp490‐scotch‐weld‐tm‐adhesive.pdf.
25. 10.3390/plasma501000910.3390/plasma5010009 ↗
26. 10.3390/plasma401000110.3390/plasma4010001 ↗
27. D.Korzec F.Hoppenthaler T.Andres et al. “Piezobrush PZ3: Part I: Operation principle and characteristics ”2020.
28. 10.3390/ma1708184810.3390/ma17081848 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10240510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102405 ↗
30. 10.1163/156856193X0060010.1163/156856193X00600 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.03210.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.032 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.016 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.09.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.09.006 ↗
34. 10.1002/pen.2468910.1002/pen.24689 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jrras.2024.10092910.1016/j.jrras.2024.100929 ↗
36. 10.22399/ijcesen.31610.22399/ijcesen.316 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15576810.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155768 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10443-020-09854-y10.1007/s10443-020-09854-y ↗
39. 10.1177/002199831559423010.1177/0021998315594230 ↗
40. 10.1002/app.3188010.1002/app.31880 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.11.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.11.005 ↗
42. 10.1109/TPS.2012.223448410.1109/TPS.2012.2234484 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.09.06210.1016/j.jcis.2008.09.062 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.09610.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.096 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.03010.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.030 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14491010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144910 ↗
47. 10.25046/aj050614910.25046/aj0506149 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.07.00710.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.07.007 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.02.00110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.02.001 ↗