journal article·2026-06-20

A Comparative Study on the Pattern Effect of Screen‐Printed Carbon Nanotubes/Cellulose Nanocrystals Strain Sensors

Adel Alrai, Kaan Yildiz, Asya Yildiz, Onur Zırhlı, Deniz Köken, Fevzi Ç. Cebeci, Hulya Cebeci

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue S2
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT One‐step fabrication technique for printing piezoresistive strain sensors on glass fiber‐reinforced polymers (GFRPs) using a scalable screen‐printing method was demonstrated. Using cellulose nanocrystals to disperse carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in an aqueous medium, various inks were prepared and tested for shear thinning, thixotropic, and viscoelastic properties. Turning the ink consistency from liquid‐like to paste‐like led to printability on the surface of GFRPs. The electrical stability of the printed sensors was evaluated by testing different thicknesses under various conditions. Results showed that electrical stability depended on the number of printed layers and applied voltage. Furthermore, the influence of pattern design on the sensors' electromechanical performance was studied for line, grid, o‐line, and omnidirectional patterns. During cyclic tensile loading, the pattern geometry affected both reliability and sensitivity, whereas linearity remained unaffected. Reliability and sensitivity demonstrated strain‐dependent behavior, while linearity improved due to additional linear piezoresistive contribution from individual CNT‐bridging. Additionally, the omnidirectional sensors were printed at three different angles and subjected to cyclic loading, revealing their ability to detect strains from multiple directions. It was also visually demonstrated that the sensors can detect tensile and compressive strains resulting from bending, showing good potential for structural health monitoring of advanced structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Istanbul Technical University Istanbul Türkiye

Aerospace Research Center, Istanbul Technical University Istanbul Türkiye

Aviation Institute, Istanbul Technical University Istanbul Türkiye

Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University Istanbul Türkiye

Turkish Aerospace Ankara Türkiye

SUNUM Nanotechnology Research Center Istanbul Türkiye

Funding

Türk Havacılık ve Uzay Sanayii

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-409605-9.00001-510.1016/B978-0-12-409605-9.00001-5 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10815010.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108150 ↗
3. 10.1002/0470092866.ch210.1002/0470092866.ch2 ↗
4. 10.3390/s1705117810.3390/s17051178 ↗
5. 10.1117/12.255926210.1117/12.2559262 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.02410.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.024 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10673010.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106730 ↗
9. 10.1177/147592171666556310.1177/1475921716665563 ↗
10. 10.1177/002199831246924010.1177/0021998312469240 ↗
11. 10.1016/B978-0-12-409605-9.00008-810.1016/B978-0-12-409605-9.00008-8 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10893210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108932 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1223396210.3390/ma12233962 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.sna.2023.11447710.1016/j.sna.2023.114477 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20220082310.1002/adma.202200823 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.05.04010.1016/j.sna.2017.05.040 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.07610.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.076 ↗
18. 10.3390/app1113576010.3390/app11135760 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20160077210.1002/adma.201600772 ↗
20. 10.3390/s1802061810.3390/s18020618 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0161310.1021/acsnano.5b01613 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10951810.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109518 ↗
23. 10.1002/adem.20170115910.1002/adem.201701159 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11328010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113280 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.sna.2015.06.00710.1016/j.sna.2015.06.007 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.2c1212010.1021/acsami.2c12120 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.00410.1016/j.addma.2018.01.004 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.031 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.01.06810.1016/j.polymer.2017.01.068 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10884210.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108842 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0027810.1021/acsaelm.0c00278 ↗
32. 10.3390/s14010127810.3390/s140101278 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.03.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2016.03.010 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.00210.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.002 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10061710.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100617 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.sna.2023.11463310.1016/j.sna.2023.114633 ↗
37. “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials ”accessed December 8 2022 https://www.astm.org/d3039_d3039m‐17.html.
38. 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.08.02310.1016/j.mssp.2014.08.023 ↗
39. Rheological Properties and Screen Printability of UV Curable Conductive Ink for Flexible and Washable E‐Textiles
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.15110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.151 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.11.02510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.11.025 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10853‐021‐06082‐y10.1007/s10853‐021‐06082‐y ↗
43. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.00810.1016/j.rser.2016.11.008 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.10063010.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100630 ↗
45. 10.1002/adfm.20210024510.1002/adfm.202100245 ↗
46. 10.1122/8.000028110.1122/8.0000281 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.12390510.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123905 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.02810.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.028 ↗
49. 10.1002/adma.20200605210.1002/adma.202006052 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.coco.2016.10.00310.1016/j.coco.2016.10.003 ↗
51. 10.1039/C4NR04489D10.1039/C4NR04489D ↗
52. 10.1002/adfm.20221327410.1002/adfm.202213274 ↗
53. 10.1109/JSEN.2015.247259510.1109/JSEN.2015.2472595 ↗
54. 10.1007/s40145‐021‐0509‐710.1007/s40145‐021‐0509‐7 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.07910.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.079 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10797210.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107972 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11554910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115549 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.12.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2017.12.002 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.24543710.1103/PhysRevB.80.245437 ↗
60. 10.1088/0957‐4484/19/05/05570510.1088/0957‐4484/19/05/055705 ↗
61. 10.1007/s10765‐017‐2254‐210.1007/s10765‐017‐2254‐2 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11060710.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110607 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.05310.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.053 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.08110.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.081 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11637310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116373 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.03010.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.030 ↗
67. 10.3390/s11111069110.3390/s111110691 ↗
68. 10.1021/acsami.7b1776610.1021/acsami.7b17766 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.04.01210.1016/j.mee.2009.04.012 ↗
70. 10.1021/acsami.5b0141310.1021/acsami.5b01413 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.034 ↗
72. 10.1007/s11012‐023‐01689‐810.1007/s11012‐023‐01689‐8 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.10.00710.1016/j.sna.2016.10.007 ↗
74. 10.3390/nano1106154310.3390/nano11061543 ↗
75. 10.1002/adem.20230076310.1002/adem.202300763 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.27910.1016/j.procir.2017.03.279 ↗