journal article·2026-06-20

Recycled Carbon Fibers in Bulk Molding Compounds: Influence of Recovery Route on Mechanical and Economic Performance

Anurag Pisupati, Lydia Bouzidi, Romain Agogué

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recycling routes influence both the quality of recovered carbon fibers and the environmental and economic value of reusing them. This study examines bulk molding compound composites produced with fibers sourced from post‐industrial waste, pyrolysis, and low temperature solvolysis. Fiber quality was evaluated using microscopy and thermal analysis, and composite performance was measured through tensile, flexural, and shear tests. Post‐industrial waste fibers showed the highest retention of mechanical properties, with flexural strength near 155 MPa, indicating minimal degradation. Pyrolyzed fibers lost tensile strength but still provided reasonable flexural and shear behavior, while solvolyzed fibers showed intermediate performance influenced by surface residues. A techno economic model, combined with a new cost benefit metric and two‐dimensional sensitivity maps, was used to assess how plant capacity and recovery efficiency affect viability. The maps indicate that post‐industrial waste offers stable performance at low cost with immediate environmental gains. Pyrolysis becomes cost effective at moderate production scale, while solvolysis is difficult to justify unless both recovery and plant size are high. Overall, the results demonstrate the environmental and industrial value of high quality recycled fibers and provide a practical basis for selecting sustainable recycling routes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre technique industriel de la plasturgie et composites Rue Leonard de Vinci, Parc Universitaire et technologique Changé France

Funding

Agence de la transition écologique

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14177510.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141775 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.clet.2021.10027210.1016/j.clet.2021.100272 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11367‐022‐02039‐810.1007/s11367‐022‐02039‐8 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10534010.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105340 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.10746510.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107465 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2724410.1002/pc.27244 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2842110.1002/pc.28421 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.01710.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.017 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10893910.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108939 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10853‐015‐9502‐210.1007/s10853‐015‐9502‐2 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jaap.2024.10684010.1016/j.jaap.2024.106840 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.supflu.2019.10460710.1016/j.supflu.2019.104607 ↗
13. B.Pillain “Définition des indicateurs clés de performance et évaluation multicritère de filières durables de recyclage des polymères renforcés de fibres de carbone issus de l'industrie aéronautique ” PhD Thesis 2017.
14. 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.02610.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.026 ↗
15. 10.1007/s12649‐017‐9901‐510.1007/s12649‐017‐9901‐5 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2700010.1002/pc.27000 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.02410.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.024 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.030 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10751010.1016/j.jece.2022.107510 ↗
20. F.Meng “Environmental and Cost Analysis of Carbon Fibre Composites Recycling ” PhD Thesis Universty of Nottingham 2017.
21. K.ShibataandM.Nakagawa “CFRP Recycling Technology Using Depolymerization Under Ordinary Pressure HItachi Chemical Review—Report 56.“
22. 10.3390/polym1707084310.3390/polym17070843 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11226910.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112269 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.01810.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.018 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.repl.2017.11.01210.1016/j.repl.2017.11.012 ↗
26. “Fiberlooping | Ultimate Fiberglass Recycling Process ” accessed June 23 2025 https://fiberloop.se/.
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10805310.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108053 ↗
28. S.Sauze G.Petit F.Goettmann et al. “From Lab to Pilot: Vapor‐Phase Solvolysis of Type IV Hydrogen Tanks for the Recovery of High Quality Continuous Carbon Fibers ” NeMMo 2025 Rennes: NeMMo 2025‐SFIP.
29. 10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e0054510.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00545 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12865410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128654 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e0103110.1016/j.susmat.2024.e01031 ↗
32. 10.1002/amp2.1016710.1002/amp2.10167 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13458110.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134581 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cec.2024.10011310.1016/j.cec.2024.100113 ↗
35. 10.3390/recycling701000610.3390/recycling7010006 ↗
36. Ucar Sokoli H. · 2016
37. “Costing Simulator | COMITE NATIONAL ROUTIER ” accessed June 27 2025 https://www.cnr.fr/en/simulateur.
38. “Electricity Price Statistics ” accessed June 27 2025 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics‐explained/index.php?title=Electricity_price_statistics.
39. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.07.00510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.07.005 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2019.10001110.1016/j.mtsust.2019.100011 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.28010.1016/j.procir.2017.03.280 ↗
42. 10.1177/0892705725134428010.1177/08927057251344280 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0665210.1021/acsomega.1c06652 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0259610.1021/acsomega.3c02596 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.19710.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.197 ↗
46. 10.1002/pc.2906710.1002/pc.29067 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.01010.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.010 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10798710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107987 ↗
49. 10.1177/002199831142060410.1177/0021998311420604 ↗
50. 10.1016/0015‐0568(76)90008‐710.1016/0015‐0568(76)90008‐7 ↗
51. 10.1080/26889277.2025.257180310.1080/26889277.2025.2571803 ↗