journal article·2026-06-20

Cure Kinetics Modeling of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Prepreg Based on Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Huiyang Zhang, Yikun Shang, Wang Yu, Xiang Cheng, Weigang Zhao, Yuanyuan Li, Pengfei Wang, Bing Li, Fujun Peng

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Understanding the cure kinetics of epoxy prepregs is essential for controlling the curing process. In this study, the cure kinetics of a carbon fiber (CF)/epoxy prepreg were investigated using isothermal and non‐isothermal differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Six phenomenological kinetic models were fitted and compared. A Friedman isoconversional analysis was used to provide initial estimates and constraints for the Arrhenius parameters, which were then refined by nonlinear least‐squares estimation with a trust‐region reflective (TRR) solver. Two global‐to‐local pipelines were also evaluated: TRR with particle swarm optimization (PSO) initialization and TRR with genetic algorithm (GA) initialization. Across both isothermal and non‐isothermal datasets, the piecewise model consistently demonstrated excellent fitting accuracy, achieving coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) exceeding 0.98 and 0.99, respectively. Global initialization prior to TRR yielded modest accuracy improvements compared to TRR alone, albeit at a higher computational cost. Models calibrated with non‐isothermal DSC produced superior predictions for a standard cure cycle compared with models calibrated on isothermal data. These results provide practical guidance for selecting effective combinations of experimental protocol, kinetic model, and parameter‐estimation strategy to support reliable thermochemical simulation and process optimization of epoxy prepregs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Robotics and Advanced Manufacture, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen China

Guangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Morphing Mechanisms and Adaptive Robotics Shenzhen China

China Academy of Aerospace System and Innovation Beijing China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.7006710.1002/pc.70067 ↗
2. 10.1007/s13726‐013‐0158‐y10.1007/s13726‐013‐0158‐y ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10730010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107300 ↗
4. 10.3390/ma1416467310.3390/ma14164673 ↗
5. 10.3390/polym1406110010.3390/polym14061100 ↗
6. 10.3390/polym1602018510.3390/polym16020185 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.1027010.1002/pc.10270 ↗
8. 10.1155/2023/524472210.1155/2023/5244722 ↗
9. 10.30919/es8d113210.30919/es8d1132 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym811039010.3390/polym8110390 ↗
11. 10.1177/002199831348202010.1177/0021998313482020 ↗
12. 10.1007/978-3-319-14175-610.1007/978-3-319-14175-6 ↗
13. 10.1021/ma00011a01110.1021/ma00011a011 ↗
14. 10.1109/EPTC.2011.618442810.1109/EPTC.2011.6184428 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1103039110.3390/polym11030391 ↗
16. 10.3390/polym1403051210.3390/polym14030512 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.1993.07050091810.1002/app.1993.070500918 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tca.2022.17921010.1016/j.tca.2022.179210 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apm.2016.08.03410.1016/j.apm.2016.08.034 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.494231510.1063/1.4942315 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.05.01710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.05.017 ↗
22. 10.1177/0021998324129581610.1177/00219983241295816 ↗
23. 10.1002/pen.76026060410.1002/pen.760260604 ↗
24. 10.1002/masy.20039006810.1002/masy.200390068 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.3298210.1002/app.32982 ↗
26. Fernandez J. M. · 2017 · 1
27. Leclerc C. · 2017 · 1
28. Menczel J. D. · 2008
29. Standard Test Method for Heat of Reaction of Thermally Reactive Materials by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. E37.01 2001.
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.12642710.1016/j.polymer.2023.126427 ↗
31. 10.1177/073168441662976410.1177/0731684416629764 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.06.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2003.06.001 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1414281510.3390/polym14142815 ↗
34. 10.1021/ci034247210.1021/ci0342472 ↗
35. On Over‐Fitting in Model Selection and Subsequent Selection Bias in Performance Evaluation