journal article·2026-06-20

Mechanical Performance of All‐ CFRP Sandwich Structures With Integrated Woven Honeycomb Cores Under Out‐Of‐Plane Compression

Chang‐ye Ni, Xin‐yi Bai, Cong Luo, Jia‐le Wu, Jian‐hong Zhang, Lu‐sheng Qiang, Rui Zhang

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue S2
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study develops an all‐CFRP sandwich structure featuring integrated woven honeycomb cores to overcome the inner core debonding issues prevalent in conventional adhesive honeycomb designs. Experimentally, the woven honeycomb cores are produced through multilayer weaving technology followed by vacuum‐assisted resin transfer molding, and the adhesive‐bonded cores are manufactured via hot‐press molding with secondary adhesive curing. Quasi‐static compression tests are performed on both honeycomb types, with digital image correlation (DIC) techniques employed to characterize their stress–strain responses, deformation behaviors, and failure patterns. Numerically, a multi‐scale simulation framework is established, integrating meso‐scale representative volume element (RVE) modeling with macroscale structural analysis, with validation provided through experimental stress–strain curves and damage morphology observations. The study reveals that the woven honeycomb cores exhibit superior mechanical performance, demonstrating approximately 11% higher compressive strength and 19% greater energy absorption than adhesive‐bonded designs under experimental conditions. Geometric parameters, particularly core height and relative density, significantly govern the transition between buckling‐dominated and crushing‐dominated failure modes. By eliminating premature interfacial debonding failures, the woven honeycomb cores achieve compressive strength closer to theoretical strength limits, with their strength advantage being more pronounced in buckling‐dominated failure regimes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control for Aerospace Structures Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China

MIIT Key Laboratory of Multifunctional Lightweight Materials and Structures (MLMS) Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China

State Key Laboratory of New Textile Materials and Advanced Processing Technologies Wuhan Textile University Wuhan China

Funding

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics · Wuhan Textile University · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.02.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.02.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.08110.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.081 ↗
3. Elastic Buckling Critical Load of Honeycomb Structure Under Out‐Of‐Plane Pressure
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.02.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2019.02.019 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00016-510.1016/S0079-6425(00)00016-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11298410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112984 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.04410.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.044 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.07.02810.1016/j.ces.2016.07.028 ↗
9. William K. · 2018
10. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.006 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.07310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.073 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11431‐015‐5869‐110.1007/s11431‐015‐5869‐1 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11431‐010‐4159‐110.1007/s11431‐010‐4159‐1 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.149157510.1115/1.1491575 ↗
16. 10.1016/s0022‐5096(97)00060‐410.1016/s0022‐5096(97)00060‐4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.01910.1016/j.tws.2016.01.019 ↗
18. 10.1177/0021998322112188510.1177/00219983221121885 ↗
19. 10.3390/polym1511250310.3390/polym15112503 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.09910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.099 ↗
21. 10.1177/1045389x1664229810.1177/1045389x16642298 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.10.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.10.015 ↗
23. 10.3390/app1111518410.3390/app11115184 ↗
24. Yuan J. · 2020
25. 10.1007/s13320‐017‐0388‐210.1007/s13320‐017‐0388‐2 ↗
26. 10.12044/j.issn.1007‐2330.2025.04.00410.12044/j.issn.1007‐2330.2025.04.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.09.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2006.09.011 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.05410.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.054 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199831990036410.1177/0021998319900364 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10787810.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107878 ↗
31. 10.1177/073168441243979210.1177/0731684412439792 ↗
32. The Adhesive—Honeycomb Relationship
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.005 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11045610.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110456 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20140180410.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
36. 10.3390/jmmp805022610.3390/jmmp8050226 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11765910.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117659 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11026710.1016/j.matdes.2021.110267 ↗
39. 10.1177/0021998322112251010.1177/00219983221122510 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.05610.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.056 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.07.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2010.07.004 ↗
42. 10.1007/BF0232509210.1007/BF02325092 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11064010.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110640 ↗
44. Abaqus User's Manual · 2008 · 1
45. 10.1115/1.363648110.1115/1.3636481 ↗
46. 10.1115/1.406800710.1115/1.4068007 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11168610.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111686 ↗