journal article·2026-06-10

Research on Long‐Term Transverse Shear Behavior Prediction of Steel Fiber‐Reinforced‐Carbon/Glass Hybrid Composite Bars in Concrete Structures

Danying Gao, Wenwen Dong, Chang Su, Zhihao Zhu, Tao Zhang

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT To investigate the transverse shear properties of steel fiber‐reinforced‐carbon/glass hybrid composite (S‐CG HFRP) bars in an alkaline environment, an experiment on transverse shear properties of S‐CG HFRP bars under simulated concrete pore solutions was conducted. The effects of steel fiber content ( V S ), the ratio of carbon‐glass fiber content ( V C / V G ), and temperature on the transverse shear properties were examined, and the deterioration mechanism was revealed through optical microscopic observation. The results indicate that adding steel fibers significantly improved the shear resistance and ductility of S‐CG HFRPs. In addition, as V C / V G decreased, the transverse shear stress retention declined obviously, which was attributed to the alkaline resistance of glass fibers being worse than that of steel and carbon fibers in concrete environments. However, the transverse shear strain retention was observed to be negligibly influenced by V C / V G . The temperature exhibited a substantial influence on the durability of S‐CG HFRP bars, as elevated temperatures accelerated resin degradation and glass fiber decomposition. After 63 days of alkaline corrosion at 20°C, 40°C, and 60°C, the transverse shear strength retention of specimens with V S of 30% and V C / V G of 1 / 6 was 97.02%, 91.65%, and 84.8%, respectively. The ester group in epoxy resin and the SiO 2 of glass fibers in S‐CG HCBs were prone to react with OH − in concrete environments, which deteriorated the transverse shear properties. Considering variations in V S , V C / V G , and ambient temperature, this study proposed a prediction model for evaluating the transverse shear strength of S‐CG HFRP bars in concrete environment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China

School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China

State Key Laboratory of Tunnel Boring Machine and Intelligent Operations Zhengzhou China

State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University Tianjin China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1260/1369-4332.13.1.8110.1260/1369-4332.13.1.81 ↗
2. Gu H. · 2015
3. Modeling of Time to Corrosion‐Induced Cover Cracking in Reinforced Concrete Structures
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.06510.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.065 ↗
5. Progress of Studies on Durability of FRP Rods Used in Civil Engineering
6. A Typical Example of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Harbour Engineering
7. Experimental Study on Mechanics Properties of Steel Fiber Composite Bar(SFCB)under Uniaxial Load
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12364110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123641 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.02910.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.029 ↗
10. 10.1177/09673911170250030810.1177/096739111702500308 ↗
11. Experimental and Theoretical Studies on the Mechanical Properties of Steel‐FRP Composite Bars
12. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10566910.1016/j.jobe.2022.105669 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.11173710.1016/j.jobe.2024.111737 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13498810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134988 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.001 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2224010.1002/pc.22240 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.002 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000056410.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000564 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12220010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122200 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.03610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.036 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12345110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123451 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.10410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.104 ↗
23. 10.1177/0021998321103163010.1177/00219983211031630 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12571010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125710 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11328510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113285 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0338310.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03383 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12558710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125587 ↗
28. ACI440.3R‐04 · 2004
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13124810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131248 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2606910.1002/pc.26069 ↗
31. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China; Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China · 2005
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000016810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000168 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000229310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002293 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.015 ↗
35. Fiber‐Matrix Adhesion and Its Effect on Composite Mechanical Properties. III. Longitudinal (0°) Compressive Properties of Graphite/Epoxy Composites
36. 10.3390/ma1419570010.3390/ma14195700 ↗
37. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00009-210.1016/S1359-835X(97)00009-2 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000051710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000517 ↗
39. 10.1007/BF0240301210.1007/BF02403012 ↗
40. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90050-910.1016/0266-3538(87)90050-9 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13124810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131248 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.038 ↗