journal article·2026-06-10

Microstructure‐Informed Fatigue Delamination Behavior of CFRP Composites Under Variable Amplitude Fatigue Loading

Jie Shi, Tao Chen, Yi Zhao, Qiang Liu, Jun Tang, Wenqing Zhou, Jianfei Wang, Man Zhu, Hai Fang

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates Mode I fatigue delamination in carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites under two‐level block variable amplitude (VA) loading, with particular emphasis on correlating delamination behavior with microstructural damage evolution. Double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens were subjected to controlled variations in peak load, load ratio, and loading transition rate, using constant amplitude (CA) loading as a baseline reference. A piecewise fitting methodology was developed for compliance‐cycle curves to accurately determine delamination onset life ( N onset ), yielding more conservative estimates than standard methods. Experimental results identify peak load, load ratio, and loading transition rate as decisive factors governing fatigue damage accumulation. Fractographic analysis reveals two competing failure mechanisms with distinct delamination behaviors: fiber/matrix interfacial debonding, dominant at higher load levels and faster transition rates, produces relatively clear crack paths and accelerated damage growth; whereas mixed failure mode, combining interfacial debonding with matrix shearing damage and prevailing at lower load levels and slower transition rates, generates tortuous crack paths that significantly retard delamination progression. The transition between these mechanisms is governed by the synergistic effects of load level and loading transition rate, with higher transition rates promoting earlier transitions to interfacial‐dominated failure. Hackle length measurements provide quantitative evidence of this transition, exhibiting distinct characteristics under different failure mechanisms. These findings establish comprehensive relationships between VA loading parameters and damage mechanisms, providing critical insights for developing microstructure‐informed fatigue life prediction models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University Nanjing China

State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control for Aerospace Structures Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China

College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology Changsha China

Dynamic Machinery Institute of Inner Mongolia Hohhot China

Urban Construction Technology Group (Zhejiang) Co. LTD Hangzhou China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/1.138139510.1115/1.1381395 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.07.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.07.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.04310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.043 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2829910.1002/pc.28299 ↗
5. 10.1111/ffe.1430310.1111/ffe.14303 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2817210.1002/pc.28172 ↗
7. 10.1016/0022‐5096(92)90198‐B10.1016/0022‐5096(92)90198‐B ↗
8. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(97)00214‐510.1016/S0266‐3538(97)00214‐5 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.05.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.05.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.009 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0013‐7944(02)00034‐610.1016/S0013‐7944(02)00034‐6 ↗
12. 10.1002/nme.133810.1002/nme.1338 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.04.00610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.04.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.020 ↗
15. 10.1002/nme.511710.1002/nme.5117 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.08110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.081 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.02610.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.026 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2953410.1002/pc.29534 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2832210.1002/pc.28322 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(99)00011‐110.1016/S1359‐835X(99)00011‐1 ↗
22. 10.1080/15376490231722485110.1080/153764902317224851 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10744210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107442 ↗
24. Dawicke D. S. · 1997
25. 10.1046/j.1460‐2695.1998.00083.x10.1046/j.1460‐2695.1998.00083.x ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10929610.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109296 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10604510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106045 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10759510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107595 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0142‐1123(01)00099‐810.1016/S0142‐1123(01)00099‐8 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.002 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.03.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.03.011 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.01310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.013 ↗
33. 10.1533/9781845699796.2.29310.1533/9781845699796.2.293 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11133810.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111338 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10794510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107945 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10981610.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109816 ↗
37. ASTM D5528/D5528M‐21 · 2021
38. ASTM D6115 · 2019
39. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.01.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.01.014 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11274610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112746 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.005 ↗
42. 10.3390/polym1421455810.3390/polym14214558 ↗
43. 10.3390/ma1624767710.3390/ma16247677 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.008 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.007 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.04910.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.049 ↗