journal article·2026-06-10Open access

Effect of Stacking Sequence on the Low Velocity Impact Performance of Abaca/Rubber Hybrid Polymer Composites

Mahaboob Subhani Shaik, Hariharan Sankarasubramanian, Indran Suyambulingam

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT Natural Fiber‐Reinforced Composites (NFRCs) have emerged as potential alternatives to synthetic fiber‐based composites for engineering applications in the automotive and aerospace industries. Despite their advantages, such as biodegradability and availability, NFRCs face limitations that restrict their use to non‐structural applications due to challenges such as low‐impact resistance. Hybrid composites have been employed to address these challenges. This study investigates the low‐velocity impact (LVI) response of abaca/rubber hybrid composites with varying stacking sequences: abaca/rubber/abaca [A/R/A], abaca/rubber/rubber/abaca [A/R/R/A], and abaca/rubber/abaca/rubber/abaca [A/R/A/R/A]. The composites were subjected to impact energy levels of 10.24, 17.14, and 23.95 J using a conical‐shaped impactor. Impact energy absorption, peak force, energy loss percentage (ELP), coefficient of restitution (CoR), and damage analysis were among the important performance metrics that were assessed. The [A/R/A] configuration demonstrated superior energy absorption, achieving 14.06% and 25.83% higher absorption compared to [A/R/R/A] and [A/R/A/R/A], respectively. The energy absorption ratios for [A/R/A], [A/R/R/A], and [A/R/A/R/A] were 70.06%, 60.20%, and 53.56%, respectively. Conversely, the [A/R/A/R/A] sequence exhibited enhanced damage resistance at all energy levels. These results indicate how hybrid composites may combine energy absorption and damage resistance to overcome the drawbacks of pure NFRCs, making them appropriate for sacrificial layer applications in low‐velocity impact conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering SRM University‐AP Guntur Andhra Pradesh India

Centre for Sustainable Materials and Surface Metamorphosis Chennai Institute of Technology Chennai Tamil Nadu India

School of Mechanical Engineering SASTRA Deemed University Thanjavur Tamil Nadu India

Centre of Excellence—Advanced Materials Synthesis (CoE‐AMS), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Alliance School of Applied Engineering Alliance University Bengaluru Karnataka India

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.03810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.038 ↗
2. M. S.ShaikandH.Sankarasubramanian “Experimental Evaluation of Impact and Thermal Properties of Abaca/Epoxy Composite ” SAE Technical Paper 2022 https://doi.org/10.4271/2022‐28‐0579.10.4271/2022-28-0579 ↗
3. A. V.Siva Charana Datta M. S.Manikanta M. S.Shaik G. S.Durbha Subrahmanya andH.Sankarasubramanian “Experimental and Microstructural Evaluation on Mechanical Properties of Abaca/E‐Glass Hybrid Composites ” SAE Technical Paper 2022 https://doi.org/10.4271/2022‐28‐0583.10.4271/2022-28-0583 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.051 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.01410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.014 ↗
6. 10.12989/scs.2019.33.2.29910.12989/scs.2019.33.2.299 ↗
7. 10.3390/jcs204006610.3390/jcs2040066 ↗
8. Pickering K. L. · 2008
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.01410.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.014 ↗
10. 10.1177/00219983880220010310.1177/002199838802200103 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/1359‐835X(96)00074‐710.1016/1359‐835X(96)00074‐7 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.08010.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.080 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2008.02.00310.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2008.02.003 ↗
16. 10.1533/9780857092281.2.34110.1533/9780857092281.2.341 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0263‐8223(03)00114‐410.1016/S0263‐8223(03)00114‐4 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.12.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.12.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.08310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.083 ↗
20. 10.1016/J.IJIMPENG.2005.01.00410.1016/J.IJIMPENG.2005.01.004 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.11.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.11.009 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2843710.1002/pc.28437 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10443‐024‐10294‐110.1007/s10443‐024‐10294‐1 ↗
24. 10.1106/YRBH‐JGT9‐U6PT‐L55510.1106/YRBH‐JGT9‐U6PT‐L555 ↗
25. 10.1080/15440478.2021.194148510.1080/15440478.2021.1941485 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.03810.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.038 ↗
27. 10.24200/sci.2018.5538.133110.24200/sci.2018.5538.1331 ↗
28. 10.1177/152808371142914410.1177/1528083711429144 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.06.00710.1016/j.matdes.2007.06.007 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2439110.1002/pc.24391 ↗
31. M. S.ShaikandH.Sankarasubramanian “Experimental and Microstructural Evaluation on Mechanical Properties of Abaca/Epoxy Reinforced Composites ” SAE Technical Paper 2021 https://doi.org/10.4271/2021‐28‐0286.10.4271/2021-28-0286 ↗
32. 10.1515/polyeng‐2016‐036210.1515/polyeng‐2016‐0362 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10853‐020‐05572‐910.1007/s10853‐020‐05572‐9 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.27610.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.276 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.33510.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.335 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11119010.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111190 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.04.00210.1016/j.dt.2020.04.002 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.02.01310.1016/j.dt.2020.02.013 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.003 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10338-019-00158-810.1007/s10338-019-00158-8 ↗