Micromechanical Modeling‐Guided Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Alfa‐Fiber/Polypropylene Biocomposites Toward a Glass‐Fiber Stiffness Benchmark
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Alfa fiber–reinforced polypropylene (PP) biocomposites were developed as recyclable, lower‐density alternatives to polypropylene containing 30 wt% glass fiber (PP–GF30), addressing weakly validated links between fiber fraction, retained aspect ratio and interfacial coupling that often constrain formulation design. A compact design‐of‐experiments (DOE)–physics–optimization workflow was implemented to deliver a formulation‐explicit route to glass‐fiber‐class stiffness. Materials were melt‐compounded and injection‐molded using a Taguchi L9 plan varying Alfa content (5–30 wt%), maleic‐anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (MAPP) compatibiliser (0–8 wt%) and nominal fiber length (1–5 mm), and tensile properties were measured (ISO 527‐2). Stiffness was governed primarily by fiber volume fraction and retained aspect ratio, strength increased with MAPP‐enhanced load transfer, and ductility decreased with fiber loading but was partly preserved at intermediate MAPP levels. Physics‐informed micromechanical surrogates reproduced experimental means with ~1.1% mean absolute error for Young's modulus, ≤ 2.4% for ultimate tensile strength at higher fiber levels and ≤ 10.1% for elongation at break, enabling constrained genetic algorithm optimization in an extended formulation space beyond the Taguchi levels. The optimum candidate (44.1 wt% Alfa, 3.0 wt% MAPP, 5.0 mm nominal fiber length) achieved 7.0 GPa modulus, 59.9 MPa strength and 1.99% elongation at break at 1.059 g cm −3 , matching PP–GF30 stiffness with a 5.4% density reduction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratoire QUARTZ (EA7393), ISAE‐Supméca Saint‐Ouen‐sur‐Seine France
LA2MP (LR13ES25) ENIS Sfax Tunisia
ISET Sfax, DGET Sfax Tunisia
Laboratoire Euler, ISAE‐Supméca Saint‐Ouen‐sur‐Seine France
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2436910.1002/pc.24369 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2951810.1002/pc.29518 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2848210.1002/pc.28482 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2859110.1002/pc.28591 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2651110.1002/pc.26511 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2833910.1002/pc.28339 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2452310.1002/pc.24523 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2510810.1002/pc.25108 ↗
9. 10.1080/15440478.2021.199348510.1080/15440478.2021.1993485 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2314110.1002/pc.23141 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12558710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125587 ↗
12. 10.1016/1359‐835X(96)00066‐810.1016/1359‐835X(96)00066‐8 ↗
13. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(02)00179‐310.1016/S1359‐835X(02)00179‐3 ↗
14. 10.1080/15440478.2024.240645710.1080/15440478.2024.2406457 ↗
15. 10.1590/0104‐1428.2022011810.1590/0104‐1428.20220118 ↗
16. 10.1177/073168442091893710.1177/0731684420918937 ↗
17. 10.3390/polym1515327110.3390/polym15153271 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2475210.1002/pc.24752 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170‐022‐08859‐010.1007/s00170‐022‐08859‐0 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2816210.1002/pc.28162 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.53410.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.534 ↗
22. 10.1080/23311916.2020.178142410.1080/23311916.2020.1781424 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12588‐017‐9194‐310.1007/s12588‐017‐9194‐3 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2070410.1002/pc.20704 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2874610.1002/pc.28746 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2970810.1002/pc.29708 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1111232210.3390/ma11112322 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.3006910.1002/pc.30069 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.2457110.1002/pc.24571 ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.76016051210.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
31. 10.1016/0022‐5096(65)90035‐910.1016/0022‐5096(65)90035‐9 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0079‐6700(98)00018‐510.1016/S0079‐6700(98)00018‐5 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1322394710.3390/polym13223947 ↗
34. 10.1016/0010‐4361(90)90240‐W10.1016/0010‐4361(90)90240‐W ↗
35. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.11939810.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119398 ↗
36. ASTM International “Standard Test Method for Density of High‐Modulus Fibers ”https://www.astm.org/d3800‐22.html.
37. ISO “Plastics Determination of Tensile Properties Part 2: Test Conditions for Moulding and Extrusion Plastics ”https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/56046/c5c3ec20cc0741289bf6def861e0a40b/ISO‐527‐2‐2012.pdf.
38. 10.1016/j.polymer.2025.12900010.1016/j.polymer.2025.129000 ↗
39. 10.3389/fmats.2018.0006010.3389/fmats.2018.00060 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.04710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.047 ↗
41. 10.3390/polym1504090010.3390/polym15040900 ↗
42. 10.3390/jcs202002010.3390/jcs2020020 ↗
43. ISO “Plastics Methods for Determining the Density of Non‐Cellular Plastics Part 1: Immersion Method Liquid Pycnometer Method and Titration Method ”https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/74990/4072f00efe044ab59338778ecd445e06/ISO‐1183‐1‐2019.pdf.
44. ISO “ISO 1183‐1:2025 ”https://www.iso.org/standard/85977.html.
45. 10.1002/zamm.1929009010410.1002/zamm.19290090104 ↗
46. 10.1002/andp.1889274120610.1002/andp.18892741206 ↗
47. 10.1080/23311916.2018.151896610.1080/23311916.2018.1518966 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.03010.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.030 ↗
49. 10.3390/polym1624350710.3390/polym16243507 ↗
50. R. M.Freund “Penalty and Barrier Methods for Constrained Optimization ”https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/15‐084j‐nonlinear‐programming‐spring‐2004/13b4c46d590cf3df94475e0ae1a815c3_lec10_penalty_mt.pdf.
51. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11355710.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.113557 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.11410.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.114 ↗