Validating a Hashin‐Based Shell Model for LVI of Woven E‐Glass/Epoxy Laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Low‐velocity impacts can cause extensive, often hidden damage in woven E‐glass/epoxy laminates. This work characterizes 100 × 100 × 2 mm, 10‐ply woven E‐glass/epoxy plates subjected to 4–35 J drop‐weight impacts (5 kg, 20 mm hemispherical tup) and validates a cost‐effective Hashin‐based finite‐element model in ABAQUS/Explicit. Experiments recorded force–time and energy–time histories and quantified ply‐by‐ply damaged areas from optical images using ImageJ. The calibrated shell‐element (SC8R) model with mesh convergence reproduced force and energy histories (absorbed energy within 3.5% of tests), realistic cross/diamond damage morphologies, and the quasi‐linear growth of total damaged area (0.83 × 10 3 to 3.96 × 10 3 mm 2 from 4 to 35 J). Simulations captured the transition from matrix cracking at low energy to delamination and fiber failure at higher energies. The validated shell‐based Hashin framework offers a fast, reliable tool for impact‐tolerance assessment and preliminary laminate sizing, reducing dependence on extensive drop‐weight testing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Sakarya University Sakarya Türkiye
Department of Airframe & Powerplant Maintenance, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics Kocaeli University Kocaeli Türkiye
Department of Aviation Electrics and Electronics, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics Kocaeli University Kocaeli Türkiye
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.16984/saufenbilder.134343110.16984/saufenbilder.1343431 ↗
2. 10.16984/saufenbilder.86967410.16984/saufenbilder.869674 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11280510.1016/j.tws.2024.112805 ↗
4. 10.16984/saufenbilder.52388910.16984/saufenbilder.523889 ↗
5. 10.16984/saufenbilder.149247610.16984/saufenbilder.1492476 ↗
6. 10.16984/saufenbilder.108017210.16984/saufenbilder.1080172 ↗
7. 10.3390/app1421963510.3390/app14219635 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.10958410.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109584 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2858310.1002/pc.28583 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1707086610.3390/polym17070866 ↗
11. 10.3390/coatings1408098610.3390/coatings14080986 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11113310.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111133 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11436310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114363 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1523454910.3390/polym15234549 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2889210.1002/pc.28892 ↗
16. 10.3390/ma1506231110.3390/ma15062311 ↗
17. 10.1088/1757-899X/73/1/01206710.1088/1757-899X/73/1/012067 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.11.01110.1016/j.actaastro.2022.11.011 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.06.01510.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.06.015 ↗
20. 10.3390/engproc202305908810.3390/engproc2023059088 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.06810.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.068 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.04.00810.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.04.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.06.01010.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.06.010 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11111310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111113 ↗
25. 10.3390/ma1609344210.3390/ma16093442 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11125610.1016/j.matdes.2022.111256 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.10531610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105316 ↗
28. 10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG‐693210.1061/JENMDT.EMENG‐6932 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ast.2021.10685810.1016/j.ast.2021.106858 ↗
30. F.Metin “Low Speed Impact Damage Behavior and Finite Element Simulation of Electrospin Nanofiber Reinforced Glass/Epoxy Composites ”(PhD Thesis Konya Technical University Konya 2021).
31. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
32. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
33. Tsai S. W. · 1965 · 62
34. 10.1177/00219983710050010610.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
35. 10.1177/0021998324122731310.1177/00219983241227313 ↗
36. 10.1177/0021998324128948810.1177/00219983241289488 ↗
37. 10.1088/2053‐1591/ac1d4010.1088/2053‐1591/ac1d40 ↗
38. 10.1177/0021998323117660910.1177/00219983231176609 ↗
39. 10.3390/polym1622311610.3390/polym16223116 ↗
40. 10.1177/0954408922111237510.1177/09544089221112375 ↗
41. 10.1177/105678951990129410.1177/1056789519901294 ↗
42. 10.1080/09243046.2016.123200710.1080/09243046.2016.1232007 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.07.02010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.07.020 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.10359110.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103591 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10797610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107976 ↗
46. 10.3390/app1312694810.3390/app13126948 ↗
47. M. R.Talagani “Impact Analysis of Composite Structures ”(PhD Thesis Delft University of Technology 2014).
48. 10.1177/09673911140220011110.1177/096739111402200111 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10594310.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105943 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10252310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102523 ↗
51. 10.1016/0043‐1648(95)06770‐110.1016/0043‐1648(95)06770‐1 ↗
52. Woven E‐Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composite–Preparation and Tribological Characterization
53. 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.12.03310.1016/j.triboint.2015.12.033 ↗
54. 10.1088/1757-899X/455/1/01200210.1088/1757-899X/455/1/012002 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10558210.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105582 ↗
56. 10.1002/pc.2765410.1002/pc.27654 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.005 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.012 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10809810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108098 ↗
60. Dassault Systèmes · 2025
61. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.03.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.03.002 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.005 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.03.00310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.03.003 ↗
64. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗