journal article·2026-05-20

Infrared‐Nanosecond Laser Stepped‐Scarf Repair: Accuracy and Mechanical Performance of Aircraft Composites Structures

Wenjing Wang, Chenyang Zhang, Wenfeng Yang, Honggang Luo, Yaling Zhang, Rongkun Jian, Chunyong Zhou, Shaolong Li, Jun He

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue S1
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Repairing damaged carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer (CFRP) structures in aircraft requires precise material removal from the affected region to conform to the repair design. The geometric accuracy of the processed area directly influences the structural integrity and functional restoration of the repaired component. This study compares laser processing with conventional pneumatic grinding, assessing machining accuracy (shape, dimensions, and depth) and surface characteristics on stepped CFRP configurations. The influence of configuration accuracy on the mechanical properties of repaired CFRP laminates was systematically investigated. Results show that laser processing achieves shape and dimensional accuracies of up to 99.9% and 99.0%, respectively, with depth precision controllable within ±10 μm. Moreover, the carbon fiber surface within the processed region retains its original plain‐weave architecture, which increases surface roughness, improves interface wettability, and promotes better bonding. Building on previous work, a comprehensive mechanical performance evaluation—including bending, impact, and compression‐after‐impact (CAI) tests—was conducted for CFRP repaired by both laser processing and pneumatic grinding. The findings reveal that enhanced structural stiffness mitigates dent depth and damage severity while improving impact and CAI resistance. Ultrasonic C‐scan results further confirm the superiority of laser processing in suppressing inelastic damage and localized failure. Owing to its high precision, controllability, and repeatability, laser‐based configuration technology demonstrates strong potential as an eco‐friendly repair method for CFRP structures in aerospace applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Laser Material Processing Techniques · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Aviation Electronics and Electrical Civil Aviation Flight University of China Chengdu China

College of Aviation Engineering Civil Aviation Flight University of China Chengdu Sichuan China

Chengdu Lianke Aerotech Co. Ltd Chengdu Sichuan China

College of Chemistry and Materials Science Fujian Normal University Fuzhou Fujian China

LB Sichuan Titanium Co. Ltd Deyang Sichuan China

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.00410.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004 ↗
2. 10.1177/073168440708775910.1177/0731684407087759 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.11105510.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111055 ↗
4. 10.3390/polym1422500710.3390/polym14225007 ↗
5. 10.3390/polym1510239010.3390/polym15102390 ↗
6. 10.1080/00218464.2021.200837010.1080/00218464.2021.2008370 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.09610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.096 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11320510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113205 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11653710.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116537 ↗
10. Gardiner G. · 2011
11. 10.1080/00218464.2014.89621110.1080/00218464.2014.896211 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.08.00810.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.08.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.12.01810.1016/j.optlastec.2018.12.018 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.027 ↗
15. 10.29026/oea.2020.19003710.29026/oea.2020.190037 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.07510.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.075 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.06610.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.066 ↗
18. 10.1533/9780857095145.2.30910.1533/9780857095145.2.309 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11588110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115881 ↗
20. 10.1080/00218464.2020.175807410.1080/00218464.2020.1758074 ↗
21. 10.1080/00218464.2025.249523110.1080/00218464.2025.2495231 ↗
22. 10.21741/9781644903599-23610.21741/9781644903599-236 ↗
23. 10.1177/002199831561499010.1177/0021998315614990 ↗
24. 10.1002/pen.2456010.1002/pen.24560 ↗
25. 2017
26. 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.08710.1016/j.procir.2018.08.087 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10956710.1016/j.matdes.2021.109567 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2781310.1002/pc.27813 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.2826510.1002/pc.28265 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2915810.1002/pc.29158 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.fuel.2025.13468710.1016/j.fuel.2025.134687 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.11319910.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113199 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cja.2024.05.04210.1016/j.cja.2024.05.042 ↗
34. 10.1177/0731684422108051310.1177/07316844221080513 ↗
35. 10.3390/s2307365910.3390/s23073659 ↗
36. ASTM, Standard D2344‐16 · 2020
37. ASTM Standards · 2020
38. ASTM Standards · 2017
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11503010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115030 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10900210.1016/j.optlastec.2022.109002 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.13248310.1016/j.matlet.2022.132483 ↗
42. Effect of Laser Surface Treatment on the Microstructure and Bonding Performance of a Carbon Fibre‐Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composite
43. 10.1177/073168441456246510.1177/0731684414562465 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.022 ↗
45. 10.1080/15376494.2018.152495210.1080/15376494.2018.1524952 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.15310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.153 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11661710.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116617 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11398310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113983 ↗