journal article·2026-05-10

Finite Element Analysis of Mathematically Generated Model of Rib 1 × 1 Weft‐Knitted Fabric Under Uniaxial Tension

Koorosh Delavari, Taejoon Park, Myoung‐Gyu Lee, Mostafa Elnaggar, Srikanth Pilla, Gang Li, Farhang Pourboghrat

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Different fiber‐reinforcement structures in composites cause varied mechanical responses by affecting how stress is distributed throughout the sample under various loading conditions. Dry weft‐knitted fabric, characterized by its high stretch rate, exhibits different behaviors when used as a standalone fabric compared to when it is used as reinforcement in composites. The high‐rate elongation property of weft‐knitted fabric arises from the yarns' interaction and the loops' geometry within the fabric, not from the material used. This study examines the tensile behavior of dry weft‐knitted fabrics, intended to serve as reinforcement structures in composite materials. To analyze the impact of this structure, a mathematical model representing the 3D geometry of a Rib 1 × 1 weft‐knitted fabric was developed. The fabric geometry was modeled using Python scripting of the mathematical equations within the ABAQUS FE software for analyzing the modeled geometries. An experimental tensile test was conducted on a commercial Rib 1 × 1 weft‐knitted fabric in both the longitudinal and transverse directions. The fabric exhibited average elongations at break of 262% and 71%, and average maximum tensile forces of 132.8 and 395.6 N in the transverse and longitudinal directions, respectively. Remarkably, the mechanical response and deformation patterns of the numerical and experimental samples closely matched in these tests. Using mathematical models to recreate the complex geometries of these reinforcements in the dry fabric facilitated the accurate prediction of their mechanical responses using numerical analysis. These models are ideally suited for efficiently generating data to train machine learning and artificial intelligence models in the future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Integrated Systems Engineering The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

Department of Materials Science & RIAM Seoul National University Seoul Republic of Korea

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

Center for Composite Materials, University of Delaware Newark Delaware USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware Newark USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware Newark USA

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware Newark USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10766510.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107665 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11568010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115680 ↗
3. Recent Advances in Bonding and Vibration Behavior of CFRP Composites
4. 10.1002/pc.2358110.1002/pc.23581 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2774410.1002/pc.27744 ↗
6. 10.17531/ein/16328910.17531/ein/163289 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.052 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.016 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11115510.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111155 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.08.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2004.08.008 ↗
12. 10.1515/aut-2004-04010510.1515/aut-2004-040105 ↗
13. 10.1080/0040500940865902010.1080/00405009408659020 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00694-410.1016/S0924-0136(00)00694-4 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00053-210.1016/S1359-835X(02)00053-2 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00056-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00056-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.10610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.106 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11184610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111846 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11313610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113136 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.02.02010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.02.020 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10853-020-05225-x10.1007/s10853-020-05225-x ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11033310.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110333 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10853-012-6252-210.1007/s10853-012-6252-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11075810.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110758 ↗
25. J.Chamberlain “Hosiery Yarns and Fabrics: Prepared for the Textile Trades Advisory Committee of the City of Leicester Colleges of Technology and Art ”(1926).
26. 10.1177/00405175470170030110.1177/004051754701700301 ↗
27. 10.1080/19447027.1955.1075034510.1080/19447027.1955.10750345 ↗
28. 10.1080/1944702600866267010.1080/19447026008662670 ↗
29. D.Munden “The Geometry of a Knitted Fabric in Its Relaxed Condition ”Hosiery Times43 (1961).
30. 10.1177/004051750809559810.1177/0040517508095598 ↗
31. Geometrical Modelling of Plain Weft Knitted Fabrics
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11395210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113952 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11314010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113140 ↗
34. 10.13189/ujme.2013.01020510.13189/ujme.2013.010205 ↗
35. 10.1007/s12221-021-0008-z10.1007/s12221-021-0008-z ↗
36. 10.1177/004051752093370110.1177/0040517520933701 ↗
37. 10.1177/1528083722109157810.1177/15280837221091578 ↗
38. 10.1515/aut-2004-04020310.1515/aut-2004-040203 ↗