journal article·2026-05-20Open access

Energy‐Efficient Electrical Curing of CFRP Composites: Parametric Effects and Comparative Performance of Direct Versus Pulsed Current

Ni Zhuang, Chao Kang, Yuan Jiang, Yuan Hu, Ashish Vashishtha, Antony Seng Kai Kho, Zan Liu, Kaining Shi, Jian Zhang

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Electrical current curing demonstrates superior energy efficiency and time‐effectiveness compared to traditional curing methods using autoclaves or curing ovens. However, achieving process stability remains challenging due to uncontrolled resistance fluctuations and methodological variations that significantly affect curing temperature uniformity. This study investigates curing mechanisms and structural properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites under both direct current (DC) and pulsed current (PC) regimes. Critical process parameters, including copper foil‐CFRP contact area, contact resistance, pressure uniform plate application, CFRP dimensions, and electrode layering quantity, were systematically evaluated. Temperature distribution homogeneity was subsequently analyzed across varying process conditions. Comparative assessment of DC and PC cured CFRP was performed through thermal response analysis, porosity measurement, and mechanical characterization like bending and compression properties. Results demonstrated that pulsed current curing facilitates enhanced temperature uniformity and stability, reducing porosity by 36.67%. The bending strength and modulus increased by 0.675% and 3.22%, respectively, with pulsed current curing, while compression strength and modulus decreased by 7.06% and 15.83%, respectively. It is also found that the resin failure particle size was larger in the PC group, while the DC group exhibited smaller failure dimensions with more brittle fracture characteristics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering Jiangsu University of Science and Technology Zhenjiang China

Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering South East Technological University Carlow Ireland

The Centre for Research and Enterprise in Engineering (engCORE), South East Technological University Carlow Ireland

School of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering Dublin City University Dublin Ireland

DCU Life Sciences Institute Dublin City University Dublin Ireland

School of Mechanical Engineering Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an China

Funding

Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province · Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10865910.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108659 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11386110.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113861 ↗
3. 10.3390/polym1422500710.3390/polym14225007 ↗
4. Influence of Stacking Sequence and Compaction Force During the AFP Process on Mechanical Performance and Damage Mechanisms Elucidated by Acoustic Emission Insights
5. H.Senol H.Ulus A.Al‐Nadhari et al. “Ameliorating Tensile and Fracture Performance of Carbon Fiber‐Epoxy Composites via Atmospheric Plasma Activation: Insights Into Damage Modes Through In‐Situ Acoustic Emission Inspection. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing ”195(2025):108929.10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108929 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.022 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-025-59848-210.1038/s41467-025-59848-2 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.02910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.029 ↗
9. The Optimization of Vacuum‐Bagging Processing in Oven Cure for Tensile Strength in Composite Laminate10.37934/araset.37.1.3748 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.10887310.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108873 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.04210.1016/j.procir.2016.11.042 ↗
12. 10.3390/ma1807147110.3390/ma18071471 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1601004710.3390/polym16010047 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2888510.1002/pc.28885 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11081410.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110814 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.02710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.027 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199831350460610.1177/0021998313504606 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00170-018-1974-110.1007/s00170-018-1974-1 ↗
19. Influence of Microwave Electromagnetic Field on Interlayer Strength in Cured Polymer Composite Materials
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11207910.1016/j.compositesb.2024.112079 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10829610.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108296 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10973-024-13002-010.1007/s10973-024-13002-0 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00170-019-03707-010.1007/s00170-019-03707-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10761510.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107615 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2599210.1002/pc.25992 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11094610.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110946 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.10365610.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103656 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.11442410.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114424 ↗
29. ASTM International · 2007
30. “Test Method for In‐Plane Compressive Properties of Fiber‐Reinforced Plastics: GB/T 5258–2008 ”General Administration of Quality Supervision Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China; Standardization Administration of China 2008.