journal article·2026-05-20

Damage Mechanism and Residual Strength Prediction on Low‐Velocity Impact Tests of Carbon Fiber Composites With Different Layup Structures

Mingze Gao, Xi Wang, Xiaori Yang, Xiaoping Gao, Wei Wu, Xin Jiang, Peijian Du

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Carbon‐fiber‐reinforced Polymer Composites are extensively utilized in impact‐prone structures due to their high specific stiffness and strength. In this paper, the effects of layup structure and impact energy on low‐velocity impact response and post‐impact residual compressive strength were evaluated, and their quantitative relationships were established using regression analysis. Carbon fiber composites with [0°/90°] 20 and [(+45°/−45°)/(0°/90°)] 10s layup structures were fabricated by Vacuum Assisted Resin Infusion (VARI) and tested under 20 to 50 J impacts. The analysis reveals that the [(+45°/−45°)/(0°/90°)] 10s laminate dissipates impact energy at lower levels mainly through matrix cracking, delamination growth and ±45° shear slip with pronounced interfacial friction, whereas beyond an approximate 40 J threshold the [0°/90°] 20 laminate exhibits fiber‐dominated energy dissipation and better preservation of structural integrity. At 20 and 30 J [(+45°/−45°)/(0°/90°)] 10s retains 10.50% and 6.80% more CAI strength than [0°/90°] 20 , whereas at 40 and 50 J [0°/90°] 20 has a 7.5% and 5.78% higher peak force, respectively. Ridge regression identifies the maximum displacement and the damage area as the critical descriptors of the residual strength percentage. This study elucidates the coupled effects of layup configuration and impact energy on damage evolution in composites and provides a framework for optimizing composite design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Science Inner Mongolia University of Technology Hohhot China

Jiangxi Center for Modern Apparel Engineering and Technology Jiangxi Institute of Fashion Technology Nanchang People's Republic of China

College of Light Industry and Textiles Inner Mongolia University of Technology Hohhot People's Republic of China

Baotou Light Industry Vocational Technical College Baotou China

College of Energy and Power Engineering Inner Mongolia University of Technology Hohhot People's Republic of China

Comac Aviation College Ordos Institute of Technology Ordos China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2793610.1002/pc.27936 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11595‐020‐2282‐910.1007/s11595‐020‐2282‐9 ↗
3. 10.1007/s42114‐024‐01192‐y10.1007/s42114‐024‐01192‐y ↗
4. 10.1007/s10853‐024‐09925‐610.1007/s10853‐024‐09925‐6 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2898210.1002/pc.28982 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2864410.1002/pc.28644 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2901310.1002/pc.29013 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2859110.1002/pc.28591 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2651110.1002/pc.26511 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.10899710.1016/j.istruc.2025.108997 ↗
11. 10.1080/13588265.2021.191498510.1080/13588265.2021.1914985 ↗
12. 10.1080/09243046.2023.217827210.1080/09243046.2023.2178272 ↗
13. 10.1177/0021998324130175110.1177/00219983241301751 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12221‐025‐01072‐210.1007/s12221‐025‐01072‐2 ↗
15. 10.1177/0021998322110122010.1177/00219983221101220 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2862210.1002/pc.28622 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.10503510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105035 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11261110.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112611 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.01610.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.016 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2834810.1002/pc.28348 ↗
21. 10.1177/1056789521106817610.1177/10567895211068176 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0270610.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02706 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10814510.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108145 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.02.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.02.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11831810.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118318 ↗
26. 10.1177/002199832090687110.1177/0021998320906871 ↗
27. 10.1007/s12221‐023‐00217‐510.1007/s12221‐023‐00217‐5 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11668‐017‐0350‐z10.1007/s11668‐017‐0350‐z ↗
29. 10.1080/13588265.2023.225862610.1080/13588265.2023.2258626 ↗
30. 10.1177/0021998325131908810.1177/00219983251319088 ↗
31. 10.1177/0021998325131938910.1177/00219983251319389 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10852710.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108527 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tws.2025.11307510.1016/j.tws.2025.113075 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.18210.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.182 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11859510.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118595 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11867610.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118676 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10820810.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108208 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11571910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115719 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.3010510.1002/pc.30105 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.017 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.010 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.016 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.10.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.10.008 ↗
44. 10.1002/pc.2905210.1002/pc.29052 ↗