journal article·2026-05-10

Compressive Performance and Design Parameter Analysis of RTM Composite Stiffened Panels With Different Stiffener Angles

Jinsong Wang, Yanyan Lu, Runbo Ma, Lei Li, Wenzhi Wang

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT The resin transfer molding (RTM) process enables the cost‐effective fabrication of composite stiffened panels and achieves a series of customized mechanical properties by changing the stiffener angle ( θ ), which is difficult to achieve with traditional manufacturing methods. In this study, experiments and the finite element method were used to explain the influence of θ on the compressive performance of RTM‐stiffened panels. A series of specimens with θ values of 45°, 60° and 90° were designed and tested under compression to examine the effects of θ on structural stiffness, strength and damage modes. Then, high‐fidelity numerical models were developed to reveal the damage mechanisms, while further investigating the effects of failure criteria and shear nonlinearity on damage prediction. Based on these results, an equivalent compressive stiffness K eq was introduced to evaluate the relationship between θ and mechanical performance. Results indicate that under compressive failure conditions, the parameter K eq directly determines structural compressive strength. However, when design parameters are changed to make the structure exhibit buckling behavior, K eq loses its guiding significance. In this case, if K eq is kept constant, the panel with θ = 90° exhibits optimal stability and strength. When θ increases to an obtuse angle, its mechanical properties are lower than those at supplementary angles. These findings provide new insights for optimizing stiffener design in RTM composite stiffened panels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Aeronautics Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an Shaanxi China

National Key Laboratory of Strength and Structural Integrity Aircraft Strength Research Institute of China Xi'an Shaanxi China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/ma1614515610.3390/ma16145156 ↗
2. 10.1155/2017/109270110.1155/2017/1092701 ↗
3. 10.1002/pi.498020050610.1002/pi.4980200506 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tws.2014.02.02010.1016/j.tws.2014.02.020 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tws.2012.09.00810.1016/j.tws.2012.09.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.018 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.021 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10443‐010‐9135‐110.1007/s10443‐010‐9135‐1 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.017 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.020 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.03810.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.038 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11312110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113121 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ast.2024.10893010.1016/j.ast.2024.108930 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.10819310.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108193 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1422500710.3390/polym14225007 ↗
16. 10.3390/jcs606017210.3390/jcs6060172 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11651110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116511 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0263‐8223(00)00006‐410.1016/S0263‐8223(00)00006‐4 ↗
19. 10.1177/073168440606507010.1177/0731684406065070 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1000‐9361(08)60089‐810.1016/S1000‐9361(08)60089‐8 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1000‐9361(11)60379‐810.1016/S1000‐9361(11)60379‐8 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.08310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.083 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.06910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.069 ↗
24. Bruhn E. F. · 1973
25. Institute CNAR · 2001
26. Chinese Aeronautical Establishment · 2002
27. ASTM D 6641/D 6641M‐09 Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials Using a Combined Loading Compression (CLC) Test Fixture.
28. 10.1177/002199830303450510.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
29. 10.1177/0954406225132341210.1177/09544062251323412 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11072910.1016/j.tws.2023.110729 ↗
31. 10.1080/15376494.2019.170115110.1080/15376494.2019.1701151 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2665410.1002/pc.26654 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2809810.1002/pc.28098 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2560110.1002/pc.25601 ↗
35. 10.1115/1.315774410.1115/1.3157744 ↗
36. 10.1177/00219983710050010610.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.007 ↗
38. 10.1177/00219983870210090410.1177/002199838702100904 ↗
39. 10.1177/002199831245447810.1177/0021998312454478 ↗
40. 10.1016/0266‐3538(92)90097‐M10.1016/0266‐3538(92)90097‐M ↗
41. 10.1177/00219983730070010810.1177/002199837300700108 ↗
42. 10.1016/0266‐3538(96)00005‐X10.1016/0266‐3538(96)00005‐X ↗
43. 10.1201/978142001424210.1201/9781420014242 ↗