journal article·2026-03-20

Interfacial and Optical Properties of Plasma‐Modified Optically Transparent Composites With Sandwich‐Structure Based on Waste Textiles

Tianxiang Ren, Yudong Xu, Yingtao Zhan, Haihua Zhan, Yuanyi Shao, Zhuping Wu, Kun Zhang, Lifeng Chen, Wei Shen, Yiwei Ouyang, Defang Zhao, Xiaolin Zhang

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Glass fiber‐reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites are advanced optically transparent materials, with ongoing efforts to enhance their mechanical and optical performance. In this study, glass fiber fabrics were modified via low‐temperature plasma treatment, and sandwich‐structured translucent composites were fabricated using modified glass fiber fabrics, plain‐woven silk fabrics, and recycled curtain fabrics with epoxy resin through vacuum bag pressure molding (VBPM). The effects of plasma power and duration on interfacial properties were examined at both micro and macro levels. Microscopically, the optimal interfacial shear strength reached 18.2 MPa under 175 W for 120 s. Plasma treatment introduced active functional groups (O–H, C = O, C–O–C), reduced surface contact angle by 47.1%, and increased surface roughness to 3.84 nm. Macroscopically, the GF‐175 W‐120 s composites achieved the highest bending strength and modulus at 474.8 MPa and 21.7 GPa, increasing by 9.3% and 14% over untreated samples. Acoustic emission analysis indicated fiber fracture as the dominant failure mode, confirming superior mechanical performance. Optical properties remained largely unaffected by plasma treatment, with variations in transmittance, light intensity, and color rendering index under 1%. Both modified and unmodified composites showed uniform luminance and soft optical characteristics. In conclusion, plasma‐modified GFRP composites exhibited significantly improved mechanical properties while maintaining excellent optical transparency, making them promising candidates for modern architectural decoration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Clean Dyeing and Finishing Technology of Zhejiang Province; Zhejiang Sub‐Center of National Carbon Fiber Engineering Technology Research Center; Shaoxing Sub‐Center of National Engineering Research Center for Fiber‐Based Composites; Shaoxing Key Laboratory of High Performance Fibers and Products; School of Textile Science and Engineering Shaoxing University Shaoxing China

Modern Textile Technology Innovation Center (Jianhu Laboratory) Shaoxing China

CTA High‐Tech Fiber Co., Ltd. Shaoxing China

College of Textiles, Donghua University Shanghai China

Shaoxing Baojing Composite Materials Co., Ltd. Shaoxing China

School of Textile Science and Engineering Wuhan Textile University Wuhan China

School of Textile Science and Engineering; Key Laboratory of Functional Textile Material and Product, Ministry of Education Xi'an Polytechnic University Xi'an China

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10841810.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108418 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.21910.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.219 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.66910.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.669 ↗
4. 10.3390/ma1111213510.3390/ma11112135 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41598-017-11919-110.1038/s41598-017-11919-1 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12221-016-6253-x10.1007/s12221-016-6253-x ↗
7. 10.1007/978-3-319-21073-5_2710.1007/978-3-319-21073-5_27 ↗
8. 10.1177/004051751769062110.1177/0040517517690621 ↗
9. 10.1177/0040517523121023910.1177/00405175231210239 ↗
10. 10.3390/textiles201001010.3390/textiles2010010 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.03.00410.1016/j.aiepr.2021.03.004 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13626710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136267 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12280010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122800 ↗
14. 10.1007/s42824-020-00014-y10.1007/s42824-020-00014-y ↗
15. 10.1080/15583724.2022.203376510.1080/15583724.2022.2033765 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0049210.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00492 ↗
17. 10.1177/152808372090186410.1177/1528083720901864 ↗
18. 10.1177/152808372091353510.1177/1528083720913535 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10853-017-1627-z10.1007/s10853-017-1627-z ↗
20. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0240310.1021/acsomega.9b02403 ↗
21. 10.1163/156855496X0017310.1163/156855496X00173 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11356-020-12227-410.1007/s11356-020-12227-4 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2457310.1002/pc.24573 ↗
24. 10.3390/molecules2806246610.3390/molecules28062466 ↗
25. Yang G. · 2016 · 1
26. 10.1177/0021998322114979310.1177/00219983221149793 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.82410.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.824 ↗
28. 10.15376/biores.10.1.1024-103610.15376/biores.10.1.1024-1036 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.2951710.1002/pc.29517 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11731510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117315 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00216-003-1750-310.1007/s00216-003-1750-3 ↗
32. 10.1002/ppap.20073120610.1002/ppap.200731206 ↗
33. 10.1177/1528083722112196610.1177/15280837221121966 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.10107710.1016/j.surfin.2021.101077 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.coco.2022.10107510.1016/j.coco.2022.101075 ↗
36. 10.1177/1528083722110964210.1177/15280837221109642 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20180715910.1002/adma.201807159 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.sna.2007.09.00510.1016/j.sna.2007.09.005 ↗