Investigation of Large‐Diameter CFRP Tie Rods Using Large‐Tow Carbon Fibers: Design, Application, and Integrated Life Cycle Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) is recognized for its outstanding mechanical properties and environmental sustainability, yet its economic viability has limited broader adoption. With the decreasing cost of large‐tow carbon fibers, a reassessment of CFRP's overall sustainability is warranted. This study investigates the use of large‐tow CFRP tie rods as replacements for steel diagonal connections in the roof structure of Xiang'an Airport. A 20 mm diameter CFRP rod was developed using 48 K fabric and a single‐process extrusion method, incorporating wedge anchorages and adjustable/fixed U‐connectors. Mechanical tests confirmed an ultimate tensile strength of 2304 MPa, an elastic modulus of 158 GPa, sustaining 109% of the theoretical ultimate load after 50 times cyclic loading. Compared with steel, the CFRP tie rod achieved a 33% reduction in diameter, 65% weight savings, and a 25% decrease in installation time. Life cycle assessments were conducted considering both life cycle carbon emissions (LCCE) and life cycle cost (LCC). Although the LCC of CFRP is 1.5 times higher than steel, its LCCE is only 53.5% of that of steel. The carbon emission intensity (CEI) per unit cost is reduced by 80%, indicating that large‐tow CFRP tie rods offer a more sustainable alternative for structural applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Smart Materials for Construction · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China Construction Eighth Engineering Division Co., Ltd. Shanghai China
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of CFRP Application Technology in Civil Engineering Shanghai China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2859110.1002/pc.28591 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2651110.1002/pc.26511 ↗
3. 10.1617/s11527-020-01510-y10.1617/s11527-020-01510-y ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2903510.1002/pc.29035 ↗
5. 10.3390/polym710150110.3390/polym7101501 ↗
6. 10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V2I7P10110.14445/23488352/IJCE-V2I7P101 ↗
7. U. O.Meier A. U.Winistörfer andL.Haspel “World's First Large Bridge Fully Relying on Carbon Fiber Rein‐Forced Polymer Hangers ”Proceedings of the SAMPE Europe Conference (Amsterdam The Netherlands: 2020) 30.
8. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10719910.1016/j.istruc.2024.107199 ↗
9. C.Liang Z.Zhu G.Bai et al. “Design and Research on Roof Structure of the Stadium of Sanya International Sports Industry Park ”Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia (International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures: 2023) 1–8.
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.006 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.04910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.049 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14013710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140137 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11848210.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118482 ↗
14. 10.3390/buildings1306150910.3390/buildings13061509 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11367-011-0264-z10.1007/s11367-011-0264-z ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.01310.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.013 ↗
17. Yang Y. · 2020 · 24
18. 10.1155/2020/665039310.1155/2020/6650393 ↗
19. 10.1061/41031(341)5610.1061/41031(341)56 ↗
20. Marzahn G. A. · 2009 · 1
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000060610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000606 ↗
22. Bhargava A. K. · 2012
23. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0269810.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02698 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2760710.1002/pc.27607 ↗
25. Global Carbon Fiber Composite Market Report
26. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.11146010.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111460 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.10969110.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109691 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.15310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.153 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13139410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131394 ↗
30. American Concrete Institute · 2012
31. EN BS. 15978 “Sustainability of Construction Works ”Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings (BSI: London UK: 2011).
32. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.00610.1016/j.rser.2014.10.006 ↗
33. ISO · 2006
34. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.02.00310.1016/j.ecocom.2011.02.003 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.00210.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.002 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.01.00310.1016/j.buildenv.2015.01.003 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13704710.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137047 ↗
38. Suzuki T. · 2005 · 14
39. Hohmann A. · 2018
40. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12430010.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124300 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.10.14110.1016/j.proeng.2012.10.141 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.08010.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.080 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.09.01410.1016/j.buildenv.2009.09.014 ↗