Testing 3D Printed Carbon Fiber Durability for Next‐Gen Fusion Reactors via Proton Irradiation
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Carbon fiber‐reinforced composites are promising candidates for plasma‐facing components (PFCs) in next‐generation fusion reactors due to their high strength‐to‐weight ratio, thermal stability, and radiation resistance. However, the effect of high‐energy proton irradiation on the mechanical and structural integrity of 3D‐printed carbon fiber composites remains underexplored. This study investigates the nanomechanical behavior and microstructural evolution of 3D‐printed continuous carbon fiber (CF) composites exposed to proton irradiation at fluences of 5 × 10 15 , 1 × 10 16 , and 5 × 10 16 ions/cm 2 using a Pelletron tandem accelerator. Nanoindentation experiments were conducted at varying loading rates (0.1–0.6 mN/s) to evaluate changes in hardness, elastic modulus, shear stress, and contact pressure. Raman spectroscopy was used to analyze defect evolution via shifts in the D, G, and 2D bands. Results show an initial softening at lower irradiation doses followed by hardening at higher fluences, attributed to defect accumulation, localized amorphization, and structural densification. A strong correlation was established between the I D / I G ratio, crystallinity proportion, and nanomechanical properties. Numerical modeling and regression analyses supported the experimental findings. This work provides new insights into the irradiation response of 3D‐printed CF composites and demonstrates the viability of Raman spectroscopy as a non‐destructive diagnostic tool for monitoring radiation‐induced damage in fusion‐relevant materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar Pakistan
National Centre for Physics Quaid‐i‐Azam University Campus Islamabad Pakistan
Department of Laser Technologies Center for Physical Sciences and Technology Vilnius Lithuania
Faculty of Materials Science and Technology VSB – Technical University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai People's Republic of China
Funding
European Commission
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0301‐4215(02)00127‐110.1016/S0301‐4215(02)00127‐1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.02210.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.022 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.00510.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.005 ↗
4. The ITER Fusion Reactor and Its Role in the Development of a Fusion Power Plant
5. 10.1007/s42114‐024‐01035‐w10.1007/s42114‐024‐01035‐w ↗
6. 10.1016/S0022‐3115(00)00203‐810.1016/S0022‐3115(00)00203‐8 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-3-540-45298-010.1007/978-3-540-45298-0 ↗
8. 10.5772/intechopen.6878510.5772/intechopen.68785 ↗
9. 10.1007/s40430‐023‐04408‐210.1007/s40430‐023‐04408‐2 ↗
10. 10.1007/978-94-009-0441-5_810.1007/978-94-009-0441-5_8 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.3000410.1002/pc.30004 ↗
12. 10.1142/1322910.1142/13229 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.phpro.2017.09.03210.1016/j.phpro.2017.09.032 ↗
14. K.Sasa S.Ishii H.Oshima et al. “Construction of the 6 MV Tandem Accelerator System for Various Ion Beam Applications ”inProceedings of the HIAT2015(Yokohama Japan: University of Tsukuba 2011) 285–287.
15. 10.1016/S0168‐9002(00)00505‐210.1016/S0168‐9002(00)00505‐2 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.07.02210.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.07.022 ↗
17. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.00410.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 ↗
19. 10.5772/2148810.5772/21488 ↗
20. 10.1146/annurev‐matsci‐070813‐11362710.1146/annurev‐matsci‐070813‐113627 ↗
21. 10.1080/09506608.2015.113646010.1080/09506608.2015.1136460 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cartre.2021.10002810.1016/j.cartre.2021.100028 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.10610.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.106 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.509010010.1063/1.5090100 ↗
25. 10.1557/jmr.2015.7310.1557/jmr.2015.73 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.08110.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.081 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.crhy.2008.02.00410.1016/j.crhy.2008.02.004 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.nimb.2019.11.01810.1016/j.nimb.2019.11.018 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.338084310.1063/1.3380843 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0920‐3796(00)00320‐310.1016/S0920‐3796(00)00320‐3 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.nme.2019.01.01210.1016/j.nme.2019.01.012 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.00110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.001 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11503310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115033 ↗
34. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
35. 10.1007/978-0-387-30877-7_1610.1007/978-0-387-30877-7_16 ↗
36. Kreyszig E. · 2020
37. 10.1111/ijac.1311010.1111/ijac.13110 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.06910.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.069 ↗
39. 10.1142/S175882511000044510.1142/S1758825110000445 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.04.01310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.04.013 ↗
41. Palermo P. J. · 2001 · 235
42. 10.1016/j.nimb.2014.01.02310.1016/j.nimb.2014.01.023 ↗
43. 10.1007/s10853‐016‐9875‐x10.1007/s10853‐016‐9875‐x ↗
44. 10.3390/ma1408187910.3390/ma14081879 ↗
45. 10.1016/1359‐6454(96)00010‐910.1016/1359‐6454(96)00010‐9 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.06.00210.1016/j.tsf.2008.06.002 ↗
47. 10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2012.05405.x10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2012.05405.x ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.04550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.045501 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.17010.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.170 ↗
50. 10.1016/0001‐6160(77)90232‐210.1016/0001‐6160(77)90232‐2 ↗
51. 10.1016/0001‐6160(79)90055‐510.1016/0001‐6160(79)90055‐5 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0955‐2219(03)00641‐110.1016/S0955‐2219(03)00641‐1 ↗