journal article·2025-12-10Open access

3D Printed Continuous Fiber‐Polymer Composites: Fiber Damage and Mechanical Property Reductions Caused by Fused Deposition Modeling

Yiwei Hu, Yazhi Li, Raj B. Ladani, Adrian P. Mouritz, Huanxin Zhang, Shaoyu Zhao

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 17

Abstract

ABSTRACT Material extrusion (ME) enables additive manufacturing of continuous fiber‐polymer composites, with carbon, glass, and aramid fibers being the most widely used reinforcements. This study systematically investigates the fiber damage mechanisms in these three filament types during ME‐based 3D printing. Fiber damages initiate as the filaments feed through the 3D printer and intensify during deposition on the platform. The extent and modes of damage correlate strongly with inherent fiber properties. Carbon fibers, characterized by low toughness and failure strain, sustain the most severe damage and breakage, resulting in 21% and 42% reductions in filament stiffness and strength, respectively. Glass fibers also suffer breakage during fabrication, although the extent is less pronounced compared to carbon fibers, with the filament stiffness and strength reduced, respectively, by 15% and 32%. Aramid fibers, while resistant to breakage due to high toughness and ductility, undergo crimping and a 15% strength loss. Such damages induced by 3D printing significantly compromise the tensile properties of fabricated laminates. The study highlights the critical roles of fiber bending stiffness, fracture toughness, and failure strain in achieving minimal fiber damage and optimizing the mechanical performance of 3D printed continuous fiber composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Aeronautics Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an China

School of Engineering RMIT University Melbourne Australia

National Key Laboratory of Strength and Structural Integrity Xi'an China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.01.002 ↗
2. 10.1002/admt.20180027110.1002/admt.201800271 ↗
3. 10.1080/15583724.2019.159788310.1080/15583724.2019.1597883 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10096210.1016/j.addma.2019.100962 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11147610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 ↗
6. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2018-019910.1108/RPJ-08-2018-0199 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.018 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10804910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108049 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1303075310.3390/ma13030753 ↗
10. 10.3390/jcs501002910.3390/jcs5010029 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11616710.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116167 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11503310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115033 ↗
13. 10.1080/09243046.2019.168279410.1080/09243046.2019.1682794 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.01910.1016/j.addma.2018.09.019 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10018710.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100187 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10177510.1016/j.addma.2020.101775 ↗
17. 10.4236/ojcm.2016.6100310.4236/ojcm.2016.61003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.00410.1016/j.addma.2017.06.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.02110.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.021 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.03810.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.038 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.020 ↗
23. 10.1108/RPJ-01-2018-000510.1108/RPJ-01-2018-0005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107147 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.09110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.091 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10807710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108077 ↗
27. 10.1177/073168441880730010.1177/0731684418807300 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.09010.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.090 ↗
29. 10.1038/srep2305810.1038/srep23058 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10967910.1016/j.matdes.2021.109679 ↗
31. 10.1098/rsta.2015.027410.1098/rsta.2015.0274 ↗
32. 10.1177/002199830708620610.1177/0021998307086206 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10782010.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107820 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10865210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108652 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.11928010.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119280 ↗
36. ASTM · 2015
37. Bending Fracture Rule for 3D‐Printed Curved Continuous‐Fiber Composite
38. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10745410.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107454 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.04410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.044 ↗
40. Y.Hu “3D Printed FDM Composites: Fabrication Microstructure and Properties”(PhD thesis RMIT University 2022).
41. Damage Evolution and Fracture Events Sequence in Various Composites by Acoustic Emission Technique
42. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00374.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00374.x ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.027 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.005 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.01.00510.1016/j.addma.2019.01.005 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.02210.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.022 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10711210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107112 ↗
48. Selection of Acoustic Emissions and Classification of Damage Mechanisms in Fiber Composite Materials
49. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00121-210.1016/0266-3538(95)00121-2 ↗
50. 10.1002/app.1179910.1002/app.11799 ↗