Frictional properties of Carbon Fiber tows adapted to Thermoplastic composites using acrylic‐styrene and nano‐modified sizing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The coating, also called sizing, of Carbon fiber (CF) tows is vital for their protection. The frictional properties resulting from the presence of this sizing are an important factor for protection and processing. Today, most CF tows are sized with epoxy‐based formulations, but new formulations are being developed to make the sizing compatible with Thermoplastic (TP) matrix. A study of the friction of these sizings depending on their nature is thus vital. In this work, CF tows with sizing that are TP matrix compatible (Acrylic‐Styrene based) are compared for frictional properties using a capstan type friction machine. TP tow prepregs with Polyamide 6 resin are also tested. The addition of Graphene Oxide (GO) and ferrite modified‐GO to Acrylic‐Styrene sizing and their effect on the friction of CF tows is finally studied. Mostly, tow to metal contacts are investigated. This work shows the relationship between the Acrylic‐Styrene based sizing and friction changes. The addition of GO to the formulations further shows a reduction in the friction coefficient compared to the virgin Acrylic‐Styrene for tow to metal contact, but with a deperdition of the nanoparticles after friction for the ferrite‐modified one. Highlights Acrylic‐Styrene sizing reduces CF tow‐metal friction 33% versus epoxy. Nano‐modified GOFe 3 O 4 sizing lowers friction but causes particle depletion. Optimal 2% Acrylic‐Styrene sizing for CF tow cohesion and friction balance. PA6 towpregs show stable metal friction but high variability in self‐contact. Ferrite‐modified graphene sizing degrades post‐friction, increases roughness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Textiles and Apparel Quanzhou Normal University Quanzhou China
Key Laboratory of Clothing Materials of Universities in Fujian Quanzhou Normal University Quanzhou China
Donghua University Center for Civil Aviation Composites Donghua University Shanghai China
Key Laboratory of Textile Science & Technology, Ministry of Education College of Textiles, Donghua University Shanghai China
Funding
Fujian Provincial Finance Department · Quanzhou Normal University
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/095440701557803710.1177/0954407015578037 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2778710.1002/pc.27787 ↗
3. 10.3390/molecules2303054710.3390/molecules23030547 ↗
4. 10.1177/089270570403847010.1177/0892705704038470 ↗
5. 10.1177/08927057900030040410.1177/089270579000300404 ↗
6. 10.1002/adv.2017410.1002/adv.20174 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.09.06410.1016/j.polymer.2016.09.064 ↗
8. Large‐ToumiB SalviaM VincentM.Fiber/matrix Interface effect on monotonic and fatigue behavior of unidirectional carbon/epoxy composites. ASTM STP 1290.1996. doi:10.1520/STP38233S10.1520/STP38233S ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.03.04710.1016/j.apsusc.2011.03.047 ↗
10. 10.1016/s0008‐6223(98)00300‐510.1016/s0008‐6223(98)00300‐5 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.03.02610.1016/j.polymer.2014.03.026 ↗
12. 10.1021/la502695d10.1021/la502695d ↗
13. 10.1021/la400222510.1021/la4002225 ↗
14. SugiuraN MakiN.Sizing agent for carbon fiber method for sizing carbon fiber by said sizing agent sized carbon fiber and knitted or woven fabric using said carbon fiber. United States patent application.2006.
15. TadepalliRHR ShooshtariKA AsrarJ GleichKF ManvilleJ.Sizing compositions and sized products for thermoplastic composites. United States patent application.2014.
16. HiranoNE TsuchiyaA HonmaM.Carbon fiber bundle. United States patent application.2015.
17. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12412510.1016/j.polymer.2021.124125 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10933210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109332 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10750110.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107501 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10737510.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107375 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.024 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.wear.2013.05.01410.1016/j.wear.2013.05.014 ↗
23. 10.1080/0040516090317859110.1080/00405160903178591 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.03410.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.034 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.017 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10773710.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107737 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.024 ↗
28. 10.1177/073168441347635410.1177/0731684413476354 ↗
29. 10.1016/s0032‐3861(97)10078‐710.1016/s0032‐3861(97)10078‐7 ↗
30. 10.1061/(asce)0899‐1561(2005)17:3(320)10.1061/(asce)0899‐1561(2005)17:3(320) ↗
31. 10.1061/(asce)0899‐1561(2005)17:3(334)10.1061/(asce)0899‐1561(2005)17:3(334) ↗
32. 10.1061/(asce)0899‐1561(2005)17:3(343)10.1061/(asce)0899‐1561(2005)17:3(343) ↗
33. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.11810.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.118 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mseb.2017.07.01810.1016/j.mseb.2017.07.018 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.00110.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.001 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.006 ↗
37. 10.1080/15440478.2019.159891810.1080/15440478.2019.1598918 ↗
38. 10.1007/s12289‐010‐0848‐310.1007/s12289‐010‐0848‐3 ↗