Transient thermal analysis of the flanged composite plate using Ansys Composite Cure Simulation ( ACCS)
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The article investigates the effects of different types of curing profiles on the minimum curing time and the degree of cure gradient during the curing process. Experimental data obtained by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were fitted to the cure kinetic model using multiple non‐linear regression analysis. The estimated kinetic parameters were then implemented in ANSYS composite cure simulation (ACCS) within the Workbench module to analyze matrix curing behavior in transient thermal analysis. A design of experiments (DOE) study has been conducted to optimize curing parameters for the shortest curing time and lowest cure gradient. Based on DOE optimization, the optimal parameters were identified as an initial temperature of 52.93°C, a heating rate of 0.5°C/min, a final temperature of 80°C, and a dwelling time of 82.52 minutes. The total curing time from the analysis was 0.31% lower than the optimization result, while the cure gradient was 3.86% lower. The validated curing simulation offers manufacturers a cost‐effective advantage, minimizing experimental workload. Highlights Multiple non‐linear regressions were used to estimate curing kinetic parameters. The Khoun and DiBenedetto models were used to obtain the curing kinetic model. The effects of the curing profiles on the curing gradient were investigated. A DOE study was performed to optimize the curing time and curing gradient.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Engineering Applied Research · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Dokuz Eylül University Izmir Türkiye
TPI Composites Inc. Izmir Türkiye
Department of Mechanical Engineering Dokuz Eylül University Izmir Türkiye
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ma070423m10.1021/ma070423m ↗
2. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.03.01110.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.03.011 ↗
3. 10.1002/pat.517410.1002/pat.5174 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00882-810.1016/S0032-3861(96)00882-8 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.06610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.066 ↗
6. 10.1007/s13726-013-0158-y10.1007/s13726-013-0158-y ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10781410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107814 ↗
8. 10.14314/polimery.2011.24010.14314/polimery.2011.240 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1103042110.3390/ma11030421 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.001 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10730010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107300 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11831-016-9167-210.1007/s11831-016-9167-2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12409110.1016/j.polymer.2021.124091 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11537910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115379 ↗
15. Analysis of composite structures in curing process for shape deformations and shear stress: basis for advanced optimization
16. SreekantamurthyT HudsonTB HouTH GrimsleyBW.Composite cure process modeling and simulations using COMPRO® and validation of residual strains using fiber optics sensors. In: American Society for Composites: Thirty‐First Technical Conference Williamsburg VA.2016.
17. 10.1007/s10443-022-10086-510.1007/s10443-022-10086-5 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.024 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tsep.2019.10041910.1016/j.tsep.2019.100419 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10443-017-9658-910.1007/s10443-017-9658-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.08710.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.087 ↗
22. 10.1007/s40034-021-00236-y10.1007/s40034-021-00236-y ↗
23. 10.1002/vnl.2215910.1002/vnl.22159 ↗
24. 10.1002/pat.649810.1002/pat.6498 ↗
25. 10.1002/pi.153310.1002/pi.1533 ↗
26. 10.1177/002199830935396010.1177/0021998309353960 ↗
27. 10.1177/095400831769329110.1177/0954008317693291 ↗
28. Hubert P · 2001 · 2341
29. 10.1002/app.1994.07051042410.1002/app.1994.070510424 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1608110210.3390/polym16081102 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.031 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.09010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.090 ↗
33. Introduction of LMAT's ACCS ANSYS composite cure simulation toolbox. ANSYS Southpointe 2600 ANSYS Drive Canonsburg PA 15317 U.S.A.2017.
34. 10.1177/002199831561520010.1177/0021998315615200 ↗