journal article·2025-06-20

Evaluating the effectiveness of fusion bond repairs on impact damaged thermoplastic composites

Matthew J. Donough, Shafaq Shafaq, Silvano Sommacal, Gleny Chirima, Matthew Ibrahim, Nigel A. St. John, B. Gangadhara Prusty

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Adhesive bonded repairs are commonly used to restore the strength of impact‐damaged thermoset composites. However, due to low surface energy, thermoplastic composites face bonding challenges. Fusion bonding bypasses this issue by re‐welding delamination cracks in damaged thermoplastic composites. This paper investigates the effectiveness of fusion bond repairs on impact‐damaged thermoplastic composites without applying a reinforcing patch. The residual compressive strength was assessed at various impact energies to quantitatively assess the damage severity and strength recovery. The methodology includes inducing low‐velocity impacts on carbon fiber/polyether‐ether‐ketone (CF/PEEK) laminates, followed by fusion bond repair using heat and pressure. Non‐destructive evaluation techniques like ultrasonic C‐scan and x‐ray computed tomography were used to characterize damage and evaluate repair effectiveness. Results showed good recovery of residual compressive strength, highlighting the feasibility of fusion bond repairs for thermoplastic composites and their potential application in aerospace and other industries. Highlights Carbon fiber/polyether‐ether‐ketone composite laminates were subjected to three impact energies and non‐destructive evaluation confirmed varying levels of damage severity. The damaged specimens were healed using the fusion bond technique without removal of the damaged area or adhesive bonding of repair patches. The delaminations were completely healed, and the specimens showed full recovery in residual compressive strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Engineering and Material Science Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

ARC Training Centre for Automated Manufacture of Advanced Composites UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia

Defence Science and Technology Group Victoria Australia

ARC Training Centre for Automated Manufacture of Advanced Composites Australian National University Acton Australian Capital Territory Australia

Australian Composites Manufacturing Cooperative Research Centre New South Wales Australia

Funding

Australian Research Council · Defence Science and Technology Group

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. vanDoorenK LabansE TijsB BisagniC WalesonJ.Analysis and testing of a thermoplastic composite stiffened panel under compression. In: Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Composite Materials. Melbourne Australia Conference August 11–16 Conference 2019 pp. 2339–42.
2. GardinerG.Composites World.2018https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/thermoplastic‐composite‐demonstrators‐eu‐roadmap‐for‐future‐airframes
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10717910.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107179 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10853-020-05133-010.1007/s10853-020-05133-0 ↗
5. 10.1177/089270571984455010.1177/0892705719844550 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11100710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.10437310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104373 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10859210.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108592 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10807010.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108070 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10989810.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109898 ↗
11. Federal Aviation Admistration · 2010
12. Baker A · 2011 · 1
13. Donough M · 2012 · 1
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.05010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.050 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10536010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105360 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.011 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.02.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2009.02.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.07510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.075 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.15310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.153 ↗
20. 10.1016/0143-7496(93)90036-910.1016/0143-7496(93)90036-9 ↗
21. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000007726.58758.e410.1023/B:JMSC.0000007726.58758.e4 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.01310.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.013 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10692610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106926 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10776510.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107765 ↗
25. 10.1080/01694243.2020.173275010.1080/01694243.2020.1732750 ↗
26. 10.1080/09276440.2020.187019210.1080/09276440.2020.1870192 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10835810.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108358 ↗
28. 10.1002/9781394198375.ch510.1002/9781394198375.ch5 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10443-020-09854-y10.1007/s10443-020-09854-y ↗
30. Correlation between surface energy and adhesion force of polyethylene/paperboard: a predictive tool for quality control in laminated packaging
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10598910.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105989 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10793910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107939 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10587010.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105870 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11047410.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110474 ↗
35. 10.1177/089270570404518710.1177/0892705704045187 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.03810.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.038 ↗
37. Repair of thermoplastic composites: an overview
38. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10689610.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106896 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10759710.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107597 ↗
40. 10.3390/ma1620676410.3390/ma16206764 ↗
41. 10.1016/1359-835X(96)00083-810.1016/1359-835X(96)00083-8 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11476210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114762 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10687010.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106870 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.023 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11040510.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110405 ↗