journal article·2025-05-10Open access

Effect of laminae count and manufacturing methods on mechanical properties of thin‐ply woven composites

Shashank Kushwaha, Mahmoud A. Mahrous, Jacob L. Meyer, Charul Chadha, Iwona M. Jasiuk

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 7

Abstract

Abstract Thin‐ply woven composites exhibit exceptional mechanical performance by delaying the onset of damage, making them suitable for high‐performance structural applications. This study outlines the impact of manufacturing techniques (vacuum bagging and hot pressing), ply count, and fiber waviness on the mechanical properties of aromatic thermosetting copolyester/carbon‐fiber (ATSP/CF) composites. The analysis encompasses several different ply counts, evaluating their effects on the in‐plane elastic modulus (0°–90°) and tensile strength. Results demonstrate that reducing the waviness (or crimp) ratio significantly enhances the in‐plane elastic modulus, with improvements up to 188%, highlighting the importance of fiber alignment. Vacuum bagging produced ply thicknesses from 128 to 58 μm for 1–36 plies, with in‐plane elastic moduli from 30.3 to 87.2 GPa, and 4‐ and 8‐ply samples showed approximately 40% higher stiffness than those made by hot pressing. ATSP resin with high thermal stability (up to 400°C) and recyclability was used. Furthermore, this study highlights the microstructural enhancements achieved through vacuum bagging, as revealed by scanning electron and optical microscopy, and micro‐computed tomography imaging. This paper provides insights into damage mitigation and achieving enhanced mechanical properties by controlling fiber waviness using vacuum bagging and higher ply count in thin‐ply ATSP/CF composites. Highlights Crimp ratio reduction enhances elastic in‐plane elastic modulus up to 188%. Vacuum bagging increases modulus over the hot pressing manufacturing method by 40%. Lowering thickness‐per‐ply increases failure strain from 0.8% to 1.2%. Explored the performance of a novel ATSP matrix with high recyclability and thermal stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Grainger College of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA

The Grainger College of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA

ATSP Innovations Houston Texas USA

Funding

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.03710.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.037 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.027 ↗
3. 10.1177/175433711559848910.1177/1754337115598489 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.01.01910.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.01.019 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10577710.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105777 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11192010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111920 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2721210.1002/pc.27212 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2839510.1002/pc.28395 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10967610.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109676 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10831410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108314 ↗
11. 10.1021/ma902596s10.1021/ma902596s ↗
12. 10.1039/c3cs60046g10.1039/c3cs60046g ↗
13. 10.1177/002199831142619510.1177/0021998311426195 ↗
14. 10.1039/d2ma00654e10.1039/d2ma00654e ↗
15. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19970430)35:6<1061::AID-POLA9>3.0.CO;2-710.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19970430)35:6<1061::AID-POLA9>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
16. 10.1002/pen.1169710.1002/pen.11697 ↗
17. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3935(19980501)199:5<913::AID-MACP913>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1521-3935(19980501)199:5<913::AID-MACP913>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
18. 10.1039/c9sm02129a10.1039/c9sm02129a ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.03010.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.030 ↗
20. 10.1002/polb.2474710.1002/polb.24747 ↗
21. 10.1080/01694243.2021.187640310.1080/01694243.2021.1876403 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11249‐015‐0621‐310.1007/s11249‐015‐0621‐3 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.wear.2016.02.01310.1016/j.wear.2016.02.013 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.wear.2017.11.02010.1016/j.wear.2017.11.020 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11249‐019‐1212‐510.1007/s11249‐019‐1212‐5 ↗
26. 10.1002/mame.20200000610.1002/mame.202000006 ↗
27. 10.1002/mame.20180064710.1002/mame.201800647 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.03.11610.1016/j.matlet.2017.03.116 ↗
29. 10.1039/c7ra12506b10.1039/c7ra12506b ↗
30. 10.1038/s41598‐018‐33131‐510.1038/s41598‐018‐33131‐5 ↗
31. 10.1016/0263-8223(94)00044-110.1016/0263-8223(94)00044-1 ↗
32. PotterK.Understanding the origins of defects and variability in composites manufacture In: International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM)‐17 Edinburgh UK p. 18.2009.
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.013 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10443‐017‐9590‐z10.1007/s10443‐017‐9590‐z ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.021 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.07.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2015.07.007 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10739310.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107393 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10735310.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107353 ↗
39. 10.1021/ma960862d10.1021/ma960862d ↗
40. 10.1007/s12221-019-1017-z10.1007/s12221-019-1017-z ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.027 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.015 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.008 ↗
44. Toray Carbon Fibers Europe.Torayca M30S Commercial documentation (AQ 866–15).2012.
45. Zhang J · 2008
46. ZhangJ. Design of Polymer Composites with Improved Adhesion and Wear Properties Ph.D thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign; USA.2008.
47. 10.1002/pat.376210.1002/pat.3762 ↗
48. 10.3390/jcs606015910.3390/jcs6060159 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.016 ↗
50. ASTM.Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM D3039/DM 2008 3039.2008.
51. 10.1111/ffe.1272110.1111/ffe.12721 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10665710.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106657 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10881710.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108817 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10831610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108316 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11660110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116601 ↗
56. OBrienTK.Characterization of delamination onset and growth in a composite laminate. Report Number NASA‐TM‐81940.1981.
57. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08247.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08247.x ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.06610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.066 ↗
59. WhitcombJD.Three‐dimensional stress analysis of plain weave composites. Technical Report.1989.
60. Effect of the number of laminated plies on elastic properties of plain‐weave fabric composite laminates
61. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11721510.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117215 ↗
62. 10.1177/030932471244830110.1177/0309324712448301 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10922710.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109227 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.02610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.026 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.10991010.1016/j.compscitech.2023.109910 ↗