journal article·2025-02-20Open access

Determination of an optimum patch configuration in the repair of a center crack in thin aluminum sheet using polymer composite patch

Amol Rasane, Prashant Kumar, Mohan Khond

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract The formation of cracks and their growth is an issue of concern in structural applications incorporating thin metal sheets. Adhering cracked region with a patch of composite material has proved effective in repairing cracks. Determining an optimum configuration of composite patch is still a challenge as a shorter patch may not be effective and a larger patch leads to wastage of resources. An appropriate methodology is required for specifying an optimum patch configuration in terms of its length, width, and thickness. The work presented prescribes a methodology for obtaining an appropriate combination of geometrical parameters of the composite patch. The computational tools like finite element analysis and response surface method have been incorporated. This is an extensive work consisting of a number of iterations of numerical analyses carried out for different combinations of the length and width of the patch. The results were also obtained for three different patch thicknesses in which the number of plies were increased from a single ply to three plies. The optimum size was obtained for each of the three patch thicknesses. Finally, a methodology for obtaining the most appropriate patch configuration based on the practical constraint of a small available area is prescribed. Highlights The crack repair in a thin structural sheet using fiber reinforced polymer composite patch separates at the interface. The optimum size of the patch needs to be used for an effective repair. The work consists of a combination of experiments and numerical simulations using finite element analysis. Response surface methodology is employed in this optimization study.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering PVG's College of Engineering & SSDIOM Nashik India

Department of Mechanical Engineering COEP Technological University Pune India

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Duong C · 2007
2. Ratwani M · 2000
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.023 ↗
4. BarrosoA ParisF ManticV.Spain: Spanish ministry of education and science projects.2005.
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.006 ↗
6. Wang Z · 2013
7. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.00310.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.003 ↗
8. SheikhS. Development of a reusable pin loading fixture to study the effect of patch width bonded ona cracked specimen.Dissertation (Pune India).2015.
9. 10.1080/15685543.2015.101242610.1080/15685543.2015.1012426 ↗
10. 10.1080/00218464.2015.107824310.1080/00218464.2015.1078243 ↗
11. PapathanassiouT FilopoulosS TsamasphyrosG.International Conference on Engineering Optimisation (Rio de Janeiro Brazil).2008.
12. 10.14429/dsj.60.36010.14429/dsj.60.360 ↗
13. Fabrizio R · 2011
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.04910.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.049 ↗
15. ANSYS 15.0.Theory Reference. (Canonsburg USA).2015.
16. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.348-349.1310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.348-349.13 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.finel.2013.06.00310.1016/j.finel.2013.06.003 ↗
18. Gift M · Elixir · 2013 · 55 · 12760
19. Response surface methodology: 1966–l988
20. Myers R · 2009
21. Montgomery D · 2001