Static and dynamic mechanical characterization and thermal analysis for multi‐ply structure of woven nettle (Girardinia diversifolia) reinforced poly(lactic acid) biocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Poly(lactic acid) fiberwebs and multi‐ply assemblies of nettle woven reinforcement are used to develop a series of nettle/PLA biocomposites with different reinforcement orientations. The tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength, and thermal properties of the biocomposites are found to improve by piling nettle fabrics and are also found to depend strongly on the piling architecture and the test direction. It is possible to obtain a biocomposite with higher degrees of isotropy and enhanced mechanical properties by using cross‐ply laminates. The three‐layered woven fabric reinforced PLA biocomposite with a reinforcement orientation 0°/45°/90° shows the best results among all the biocomposites developed in this study. The tensile strength, Young's (tensile) modulus, flexural strength, impact strength, storage modulus, and loss modulus of the biocomposite are found as 55.25 MPa, 6.30 GPa, 85.83 MPa, 63.74 J/m2, 10.08 GPa, and 0.75 GPa, respectively. In this biocomposite, a fair adhesion between matrix and reinforcement is noticed, and this is justified by retardation of crack propagation as well as by substantial energy dissipation. The thermal stability of the biocomposite does not get effected much, but the percent crystallinity increases by 25.84%. The degradation kinetics and the activation energy of the biocomposite are determined through a differential fitting of Arrhenius model. The soil burial test reveals 15.06% of weight loss and 50.56% strength loss for this biocomposite just after 20 days of burial under soil. Highlights Multi‐ply architecture of woven fabric reinforcement in nettle/PLA biocomposites. Nearly isotropic biocomposite through angle‐ply orientation of reinforcement. Biocomposite with remarkable static and dynamic mechanical properties. Augmented kinetic parameters through model fitting of Arrhenius equation. Biocomposite with excellent thermo‐recyclability and biodegradability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile and Fiber Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Delhi New Delhi India
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. McGraw Hill · 2017
2. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10013810.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100138 ↗
3. 10.1002/jsfa.255810.1002/jsfa.2558 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.01610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.01210.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.012 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0141‐3910(02)00372‐510.1016/S0141‐3910(02)00372‐5 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.07310.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.073 ↗
8. Barth M · 2015
9. 10.56093/ijas.v88i8.8257910.56093/ijas.v88i8.82579 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biteb.2021.10086010.1016/j.biteb.2021.100860 ↗
11. 10.1177/002199831143567610.1177/0021998311435676 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.05910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.059 ↗
13. 10.3390/app1219983510.3390/app12199835 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.11186010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.111860 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11424710.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114247 ↗
16. 10.1080/15440478.2017.136420210.1080/15440478.2017.1364202 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.2539910.1002/pc.25399 ↗
18. Agarwal BD · 2016
19. 10.1080/09243046.2019.157344810.1080/09243046.2019.1573448 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1359‐8368(00)00028‐710.1016/S1359‐8368(00)00028‐7 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.12738110.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127381 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(99)00166‐910.1016/S0266‐3538(99)00166‐9 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10784410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107844 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10549310.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105493 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10973‐011‐1714‐310.1007/s10973‐011‐1714‐3 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.08910.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.089 ↗
27. 10.1007/s12221‐010‐0060‐610.1007/s12221‐010‐0060‐6 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2006310.1002/pc.20063 ↗
29. 10.1177/073168441667292510.1177/0731684416672925 ↗
30. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(96)00127‐310.1016/S1359‐835X(96)00127‐3 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.013 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.014 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.02910.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.029 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.01.017 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.10210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.102 ↗
36. 10.1007/s12221‐022‐4370‐210.1007/s12221‐022‐4370‐2 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.05910.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.059 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.11.01010.1016/j.biombioe.2003.11.010 ↗
39. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5672-710.1007/978-1-4020-5672-7 ↗
40. 10.3390/ma1406152310.3390/ma14061523 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.012 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12184310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121843 ↗
43. 10.3390/polym1421468710.3390/polym14214687 ↗
44. 10.3390/polym1303032510.3390/polym13030325 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12367910.1016/j.polymer.2021.123679 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.11.00710.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.11.007 ↗
47. 10.1007/BF0207069010.1007/BF02070690 ↗
48. 10.1007/s00253‐006‐0488‐110.1007/s00253‐006‐0488‐1 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.03.00510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.03.005 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.02510.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.025 ↗
51. 10.1021/ie051207+10.1021/ie051207+ ↗
52. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(98)00049‐910.1016/S1359‐835X(98)00049‐9 ↗