Effects of cyclic absorption–desorption of model fuels by aerospace‐grade carbon/epoxy composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The aviation industry is in the process of using several alternative fuels sourced from renewable sources to decrease its impact on the environment. These alternative fuels are mostly comprised of aliphatic hydrocarbons and have low to no aromatic content. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has approved several drop‐in fuels, in which alternative fuels are typically blended with conventional Jet A fuel. Because of blending, the drop‐in fuels consist of both aliphatic and aromatic components. To achieve a fundamental understanding of how individual aliphatic and aromatic components interact with the aerospace‐grade composites, we have considered four model fuels, three aliphatic with varying chain lengths and one aromatic. The absorption of these model fuels by composites in three absorption/desorption cycles was captured and compared to the conventional Jet A fuel. The equilibrium weight gain by the composites due to absorption was low but was different for each model fuel, and the trend could be validated using Hansen solubility parameters. The absorption of model fuels decreased the glass transition temperature of composites. The change in glass transition temperature was not significantly different between the model fuels and the conventional fuel. These results can be translated to alternative fuels, making them a possible substitute for Jet A in the aviation industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Flame retardant materials and properties · Polymer Foaming and Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USA
Advanced Composites Institute Mississippi State University Starkville Mississippi USA
J. Mike Walker '66 Department of Mechanical Engineering Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA
Department of Chemistry Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USA
Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical Engineering Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USA
Funding
Federal Aviation Administration
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.47287/cen‐09932‐cover10.47287/cen‐09932‐cover ↗
2. CAAFI.Frequently asked questions. Accessed December 25.2022www.caafi.org/resources/faq.html
3. CAAFI.Fuel qualification. Accessed December 25.2022https://www.caafi.org/focus_areas/fuel_qualification.html
4. 10.1520/D4054‐2210.1520/D4054‐22 ↗
5. 10.1520/D7566‐2110.1520/D7566‐21 ↗
6. 10.1016/B978‐0‐444‐64192‐2.00015‐910.1016/B978‐0‐444‐64192‐2.00015‐9 ↗
7. Mazumdar SK · 2002
8. 10.3390/polym1110166710.3390/polym11101667 ↗
9. 10.18063/msacm.v1i1.50010.18063/msacm.v1i1.500 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.20110.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.201 ↗
11. 10.1177/073168440606024710.1177/0731684406060247 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.75013060610.1002/pc.750130606 ↗
13. 10.1002/(SICI)1097‐4628(19990131)71:5<787::AID‐APP12>3.0.CO;2‐A10.1002/(SICI)1097‐4628(19990131)71:5<787::AID‐APP12>3.0.CO;2‐A ↗
14. Curliss DB · 1991
15. Curliss DB · 1990
16. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(97)00017‐110.1016/S0266‐3538(97)00017‐1 ↗
17. 10.1016/0266‐3538(90)90021‐V10.1016/0266‐3538(90)90021‐V ↗
18. 10.1177/073168441558538110.1177/0731684415585381 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.2209510.1002/app.22095 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.016 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.016 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.02.02310.1016/j.compositesb.2006.02.023 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.45510.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.455 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11029‐021‐09982‐x10.1007/s11029‐021‐09982‐x ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359‐8368(00)00025‐110.1016/S1359‐8368(00)00025‐1 ↗
26. 10.1115/IMECE2002‐3922310.1115/IMECE2002‐39223 ↗
27. Weitsman Y · 1986
28. 10.1177/07316844910100060610.1177/073168449101000606 ↗
29. Ho T · 1981
30. 10.1177/00219983800140020610.1177/002199838001400206 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.015 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(97)00222‐410.1016/S0266‐3538(97)00222‐4 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2105410.1002/pc.21054 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2116010.1002/pc.21160 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2296710.1002/pc.22967 ↗
36. 10.1002/pc.2509410.1002/pc.25094 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2670510.1002/pc.26705 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.2653910.1002/pc.26539 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.2601510.1002/pc.26015 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2667310.1002/pc.26673 ↗
41. 10.1002/pc.2581810.1002/pc.25818 ↗
42. 10.1177/002199830606731110.1177/0021998306067311 ↗
43. 10.1007/s10853‐019‐03399‐710.1007/s10853‐019‐03399‐7 ↗
44. 10.3390/polym1109138310.3390/polym11091383 ↗
45. 10.1002/pc.1038310.1002/pc.10383 ↗
46. 10.1080/00218464.2021.192624210.1080/00218464.2021.1926242 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12281910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122819 ↗
48. Types of Aircraft Fuel Tanks. Accessed January 27 2023.2017https://www.aircraftsystemstech.com/2017/06/types-of-aircraft-fuel-tanks.html
49. 10.1016/0266‐3538(96)00065‐610.1016/0266‐3538(96)00065‐6 ↗
50. 10.1002/pc.75015030810.1002/pc.750150308 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10853‐005‐0760‐210.1007/s10853‐005‐0760‐2 ↗
52. 10.1177/00219983810150010310.1177/002199838101500103 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0032‐3861(97)89716‐910.1016/S0032‐3861(97)89716‐9 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.010 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11099310.1016/j.matdes.2022.110993 ↗
56. HarichN BassouR RighiH et al.Effects of new jet fuel exposure on aerospace composites – phase 1 final report. DOT/FAA/TC‐21/53.2022.
57. 10.1201/978042919030810.1201/9780429190308 ↗
58. 10.1088/1757‐899X/362/1/01200510.1088/1757‐899X/362/1/012005 ↗
59. 10.1002/pc.75014050810.1002/pc.750140508 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.002 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.05.07810.1016/j.proeng.2015.05.078 ↗
62. BassouR HarichN LacyTE PittmanCU PriddyMW KunduS.Effect of jet fuels exposure on aerospace composites—literature review. DOT/FAA/TC‐20/22.2021.
63. First A319neo flight with 100% sustainable aviation fuel | Airbus. Accessed December 25 2022.https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2021-10-first-a319neo-flight-with-100-sustainable-aviation-fuel2021.
64. Airbus.First in‐flight 100% sustainable‐fuels emissions study of passenger jet shows early promise|Airbus. Accessed December 25 2022.https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2021-11-first-in-flight-100-sustainable-fuels-emissions-study-of-passenger2021.
65. Airbus.First A380 powered by 100% sustainable aviation fuel takes to the skies. Accessed December 25.2022https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/press‐releases/2022‐03‐first‐a380‐powered‐by‐100‐sustainable‐aviation‐fuel‐takes‐to‐the
66. FAA.New alternative jet fuel approved. Accessed December 25 2022.2016https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=85425
67. Investigative study to determine effects of hydro‐treated renewable JP‐8 jet fuel blend in existing fuels infrastructure. Report AFCESA‐CO‐Ty‐TR‐2012‐0001.Pond & Company Inc.;2012.
68. 10.1080/09593330.2011.58673210.1080/09593330.2011.586732 ↗
69. 10.1021/ma00207a01010.1021/ma00207a010 ↗
70. Hexcel Corporation · 2020 · 1
71. Gary JH · 2020
72. Air BP.Handbook of products.2000.
73. 10.18434/T4D30310.18434/T4D303 ↗
74. 10.1520/D5229_D5229M‐2010.1520/D5229_D5229M‐20 ↗
75. 10.1520/D7028‐07R1510.1520/D7028‐07R15 ↗
76. 10.1016/B978‐0‐323‐26435‐8.00004‐610.1016/B978‐0‐323‐26435‐8.00004‐6 ↗
77. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b0065610.1021/acs.jcim.9b00656 ↗
78. Vandi L‐J · 2012 · 1984
79. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0010810.1021/acsomega.7b00108 ↗
80. 10.1201/978142000683410.1201/9781420006834 ↗