journal article·2019-09-09Open access

Thermoresponsive Injectable Microparticle–Gel Composites with Recombinant BMP-9 and VEGF Enhance Bone Formation in Rats

Bipin Gaihre, Janitha M. Unagolla, Jiayong Liu, Nabil A. Ebraheim, Ambalangodage C. Jayasuriya

Abstract

Bone morphogenetic protein-9 (BMP-9) has been shown to be the most osteogenic BMP. Most of these experiments, however, involve an adenovirus-transfection strategy. Here, we used the scaffold-based strategy to study the bone forming ability of recombinant BMP-9 combined with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). A robust, injectable, multicomponent-releasing scaffold in the form of a composite gel was developed by combining chitosan microparticles (MPs) with thermosensitive gel (MPs-gel). The MPs acted as the carriers for BMP-9 and the gel was loaded with VEGF. The developed gel consisted of hydrophobic chains of methyl cellulose (MC) and the cross-linked structures of alginate (Alg) and calcium. Gelation was achieved at physiological temperature and thus facilitated the injection and localization of MPs enabling an increased efficacy of incorporated growth factors at the target site. A release profile of incorporated growth factors over a two-week period showed higher release of VEGF at each time point compared to that of BMP-9. Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) encapsulated within the MPs-gel maintained their viability. BMP-9 enhanced the proliferation of hMSCs along the surface of MPs. Furthermore, BMP-9 potently induced the osteogenic differentiation of encapsulated hMSCs elucidated by the increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the higher expression of ALP, collagen 1, and osteocalcin genes. In addition, in vivo experiments demonstrated that MPs-gel with the combination of BMP-9-VEGF could significantly enhance both subcutaneous and cranial bone formation (p < 0.05). Taken together, the results here strongly suggest that BMP-9-VEGF incorporated MPs-gel holds promise as an injectable bone tissue engineering platform.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Bioengineering, The University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Toledo, Ohio 43606, United States

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, Ohio 43614, United States

Funding

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70014-610.1016/S1369-7021(10)70014-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.017 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20080200910.1002/adma.200802009 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.7b1702010.1021/acsami.7b17020 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.7b1584510.1021/acsami.7b15845 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.06.00310.1016/j.carbpol.2010.06.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.07010.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.070 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003 ↗
9. 10.1021/bm049813w10.1021/bm049813w ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.09.02710.1016/j.carbpol.2006.09.027 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.7b0421610.1021/acsami.7b04216 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.03110.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.031 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.031 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0160410.1021/acs.biomac.6b01604 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.04210.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.042 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.025 ↗
17. 10.1021/am503787h10.1021/am503787h ↗
18. 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00487-810.1016/S0378-5173(02)00487-8 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.04710.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.047 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.00310.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.003 ↗
21. 10.2106/00004623-200308000-0001710.2106/00004623-200308000-00017 ↗
22. 10.4236/abb.2013.410A400410.4236/abb.2013.410A4004 ↗
23. 10.3389/fphar.2013.0012510.3389/fphar.2013.00125 ↗
24. 10.1111/eos.1224910.1111/eos.12249 ↗
25. 10.1002/jor.2242710.1002/jor.22427 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598-017-06548-710.1038/s41598-017-06548-7 ↗
27. 10.1038/sj.gt.330229810.1038/sj.gt.3302298 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.7b0027210.1021/acsami.7b00272 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.03210.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.032 ↗
30. 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.000810.1089/ten.tea.2011.0008 ↗
31. 10.3389/fbioe.2017.0006810.3389/fbioe.2017.00068 ↗
32. 10.1002/jbm.a.3510010.1002/jbm.a.35100 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.02.03410.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.02.034 ↗
34. 10.3390/cells203046010.3390/cells2030460 ↗
35. 10.1177/088532821774152310.1177/0885328217741523 ↗
36. 10.1098/rsif.2010.022310.1098/rsif.2010.0223 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.01610.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016 ↗
38. 10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00053-X10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00053-X ↗
39. 10.1002/adhm.20160018710.1002/adhm.201600187 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.00110.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.001 ↗
41. 10.4238/2015.July.13.410.4238/2015.July.13.4 ↗
42. Lamplot J. D. · Am. J. Stem Cells · 2013 · 2 · 1
43. 10.1002/jbm.a.3500610.1002/jbm.a.35006 ↗
44. 10.1371/journal.pone.017232710.1371/journal.pone.0172327 ↗
45. 10.1089/scd.2011.051710.1089/scd.2011.0517 ↗
46. 10.1088/1748-6041/11/2/02502110.1088/1748-6041/11/2/025021 ↗
47. 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.040710.1089/ten.tea.2007.0407 ↗
48. 10.1089/ten.tec.2011.014010.1089/ten.tec.2011.0140 ↗