journal article·2019-03

Comparison on the properties of the wheat straw/rubber composites by adding graphite/carbon fiber

Yalan Li, Min Xu

Polymer Composites· Volume 40· Issue S2
Publisher page

Abstract

The conductive wheat straw/rubber composites (WSRCs) were prepared with wheat straw fiber (WSF), rubber compound and graphite powder (GP), or carbon fiber (CF). WSRCs with different loading of conductive fillers were prepared. The curing properties, mechanical properties, dynamic mechanical properties, morphology structure and conductive properties of the composites were investigated with reference to the conductive filler loading. Sodium hydroxide combined with bis‐[γ‐(triethoxysily)‐propyl] tetrasulfide (NaOH‐Si69‐treated WSF) had a better bonding with the rubber matrix. The incorporation of GP and CF could restrict the mobility of matrix macromolecular chains and increase the viscosity of GP/CF‐filled WSRCs, resulting in the increases in torque, stiffness and storage modulus and the slight reduction in scorch time and tensile strength as well as the damping behavior. Moreover, the conductivity of the WSRCs was increased significantly as the increase in filler loading. It was also found that the conductivity of GP‐filled WSRCs were higher than that of the CF‐filled ones. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:E983–E992, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Bio‐Based Material Science and Technology (Ministry of Education), College of Material Science and Engineering Northeast Forestry University Harbin 150040 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.03610.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.036 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11434-008-0145-410.1007/s11434-008-0145-4 ↗
3. 10.1038/srep3230710.1038/srep32307 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep0636010.1038/srep06360 ↗
5. Islam M.S. · Int. J. Polym. Sci. · 2007 · 44
6. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.01.00710.1016/j.indcrop.2008.01.007 ↗
7. 10.1002/adv.1007010.1002/adv.10070 ↗
8. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.2510.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.25 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
10. 10.1002/app.1356410.1002/app.13564 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.04710.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.047 ↗
12. 10.1002/masy.20069009610.1002/masy.200690096 ↗
13. Xu M. · Bioresour. Technol. · 2012 · 118
14. Xu M. · Wood. Fiber. Sci. · 2014 · 46 · 4
15. 10.3390/ma906046910.3390/ma9060469 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep0723210.1038/srep07232 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.1347210.1002/app.13472 ↗
18. Zou H. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2010 · 115 · 5
19. 10.1002/app.3379810.1002/app.33798 ↗
20. Zhang W. · J. Mater. Sci · 2007 · 42 · 10
21. 10.1002/pi.81110.1002/pi.811 ↗
22. Guo H. · Mater. Lett. · 2009 · 63 · 17
23. Jacob M. · Polym. Compos. · 2010 · 27 · 6
24. Mansour S.H. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2006 · 102 · 6
25. Ooi Z.X. · Polym. Test. · 2013 · 32 · 4
26. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.8310.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.83 ↗
27. 10.1002/app.1995.07055040510.1002/app.1995.070550405 ↗
28. Fu S.‐Y. · Compos. B Eng. · 2008 · 39 · 6
29. Ozbas B. · J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. · 2012 · 50 · 10
30. 10.1002/app.3313910.1002/app.33139 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.09.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.09.005 ↗
32. Ye L. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2007 · 105 · 6